Eradicating Earth’s Mosquitoes to Fight Disease Is Probably a Bad Idea(motherboard.vice.com) |
Eradicating Earth’s Mosquitoes to Fight Disease Is Probably a Bad Idea(motherboard.vice.com) |
On the flip side, we do know what will happen if the Aedes aegypti, Anopheles, etc... is allowed to continue to exist - 100s of thousands of people a year will die.
I wonder how the author would feel about keeping mosquitoes around "just in case", if hundreds of thousands of her neighbors were dying every year.
And guess what, if, for some very, very bizarre reason it turns out that Aedes aegypti/Anopheles was a super important species, there is zero difficulty in breeding and releasing billions of them back into the wild in very short order.
On the pro-science side there's singularities and AI fantasy and the anti-science side the planet is "being destroyed".
It's just one giant argument from ignorance, "we don't know, therefore you don't know, therefore we can say anything we like".
On the other hand, we should probably do some due diligence before deciding to embark on a mosquitocide, just to try and swing the odds in our favour.
I.e. please be completely certain that the GM offspring mating with female individuals will not result in some other side effect...
Because, here's the thing - we do know the implications of letting these mosquitoes live. 100s of thousands of people a year die. Every Year.
The potential of unforeseen mutations occurring is 100%, GM or no. How do you think species evolve?
That's why I love the idea of being able to genetically modify them to produce only male offspring. It provides a nice, asymptotic curve way of culling the population without dramatically changing their ecosystem overnight
If it works exactly as described, the 'only male offspring' modification should be nice and side-effect-free. But then, evolution is a big-numbers statistical game. Who knows what interesting variations we'll see..
So eradicating human-threat mosquitoes may not have such a large effect on the global mosquito ecosystem.
It's disappointing to see an ostensibly researched article not even approach our remedial level. I wonder why anyone would upvote it.
mosquitos inhabit a niche which could be filled by another organism were they to be eradicated and then we're back to square-one in a new way
but yeh let's eradicate them
Admitting it is maybe not so popular.
Sorry, Nature, but I can name several species that could not live without mosquitoes, and you should be able to do the same also. This would be like banning the milk for babies because humans don't depend solely on milk and can eat many other things.
If you believe the Monsanto GM corn documentaries, releasing GM into the wild may have bad effects (intended or otherwise) outside the designated population. Plants are obviously not the same as insects, but I would prefer to err on the safe(r) side.
Edit: Also, a known bad is often better than an unknown.
You know what would turn around everyone's attitude in about 7 days flat (probably fewer) - have those hundreds of thousands of people dying a year be white, rich, Americans. Every conceivable solution to wipe out the mosquitos would be developed, and rolled out with zero debate (and I mean zero - there wouldn't be a single naysayer of any merit)
People shooting any GM advance on the same basket as if every change was the same irks me. It's similar to talk about how computer malware is harmful, thus you must never install anything on your PC.
"Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."