As for the essay, "constructive criticism" means two things. One is feedback, which can be negative, designed to improve things. Peer review of scientific papers is sometimes a form of constructive criticism.

Another - the one the essay highlights - is when 'constructive criticism' is used as cover for punching down, in order to minimize the negative repercussions.

(It's also a way to enforce a "tall poppy syndrome" culture, but the essay didn't mention that type of 'constructive criticism.'

"Devil's advocate" is a similar term with two different meanings. In the best of cases, it's someone who gives negative criticism meant to highlight the flaws in a proposal, even if the speaker is not against the proposal. In practice it's more often used as a cover for someone who wants to make a negative comment without putting much thought into the topic, and who doesn't want the triteness of the comment to be interpreted as personal ignorance.