The Node.js community is “completely feral”

The Node.js community is “completely feral”(computing.co.uk)

16 points by MalcolmDiggs 9 years ago | 8 comments

noir_lord 9 years ago |

I use node (or more correctly I use a small part of it via browserify) and while I like what it brings to the table (mostly the ability to sanely and somewhat cleanly import things in a way that works for me) I find stuff like this http://i.imgur.com/n92uG9J.jpg makes my head hurt.

I come from a desktop background originally and I still miss having large (mostly) complete and (mostly) stable standard libraries something I miss.

That and I'm never going to like JavaScript, it just doesn't fit my mental model well at all.

digitalarborist 9 years ago | |

It's interesting to me that everyone uses that isArrayish module example as though it represented the downfall of civilization when to me, yes maybe it represents the downfall of civilization a little bit, but it also represents the strength of npm. Absolutely anyone can create code, put it online and then have others use it fast. Of course this means you do end up with a lot of nonsense, but a lot of brilliance too.

Nobody does this with maven because maven and the Java community in general makes this hard. It's doable, but generally takes more work, which is a strength and a weakness for the Java community. You could argue this is "worse is better"[0], making sacrifices, in this case in redundancy for simplicity of use. People should really just write the code for isArrayish if it is this simple, or perhaps the language or babel or whatever should provide such a function.

However no one forces anyone to use these, if you want a standard library, use Lodash, here is its isArray: https://lodash.com/docs#isArray, it even has differentiations of this like: https://lodash.com/docs#isArrayLikeObject. Complaints about something like the isArrayish module make my head hurt. It filled a void fast where one existed so people could use it and get on with their projects and subsequently their lives. I just don't see anything wrong with that.

0) https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html

visarga 9 years ago | | |

> Absolutely anyone can create code, put it online and then have others use it fast.

And after 2 years remove or change it in a malicious way and break thousands of other packages and projects. Because it's absolutely anyone.

mixedCase 9 years ago | | |

>It's interesting to me that everyone uses that isArrayish module example as though it represented the downfall of civilization when to me, yes maybe it represents the downfall of civilization a little bit, but it also represents the strength of npm. Absolutely anyone can create code, put it online and then have others use it fast. Of course this means you do end up with a lot of nonsense, but a lot of brilliance too.

How is JS/NPM in that sense better than Go, a language with a strong standard library, with a solid developer community around it and where packages are as easy as pushing to a git server?

Or how does it improve over similar, more traditional package management stories like Python/pip?

noir_lord 9 years ago | | |

I do use lodash and I very carefully consider my dependencies, the problem is when I pull in something and it then pulls in 250 packages, now I'm dependent on them as well, it does it's job but sometimes I wonder how any of it works but maybe in just old.

oluwie 9 years ago |

Awful article. This gives no concrete information about the Node.js community apart from the opinion that "they don't know what they're doing".

This is not a defense of Node.js in general but in defense of good journalism; not writing an entire click-bait article off the random thought of an CEO I've never heard of.

bricss 9 years ago |

Such hype, such article