The article was interesting in that it use the word "could". In context, the only ice that will contribute to sea level rises is land based. We could lose all the sea based ice and the overall effect most likely will be a drop in sea level.

To get a 1 metre sea level rise, requires the melting of land based ice of a volume equivalent to the entire surface area of Australia covered to a depth of 45 metres or so. The energy requirements for phase conversion is at least 1 million 25 MegaTonne nuclear bombs going off,

Based on every relevant paper on the subject that I have been able to find, and it appears that it would take anywhere between 1000 and 3500 years before we would get this 1 metre rise.

The last set of figures that I saw from the IPCC is that it would be about 1000 years to see this kind of rise, if their measurements were correct.

The thing I find interesting is that we (as humans) have a very short term memory of what has happened in the past. Especially, when things are driven by authoritative groups such as governments (and attendant bureaucracies) and science committees and panels.

Doing something about global warming (a-hem climate change) always boils down to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, people at the bottom who are struggling for housing, food, safety, etc are not concerned with coal power station emissions (as an example.) So we get short term goals from politicians that are just scary in how short sighted they are.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs

Serious question, if sea level increases are so damaging and feared is it possible to build a water pipeline (like an oil pipeline) from higher coastland to a lower area and then create an artificial river to use in an artificial dam. I think estimates put sea levels rising at around 3 mm a year. I did the rough math and 3mm cubed is a lot but I think it can be doable for $15B and the potential artificial dam might be useful too. I have absolutely no knowledge of any of this though and apologize if the idea seems stupid

Mods, can you decapitalize the title please? The original article doesn't capitalize it (although see below for details).

If I understand you correctly you're suggesting treating the ocean like an elevated lake, and putting a pipe to a lower place so the water pressure could generate electricity.

The two things that come to mind for me are:

1. It's hard to find land lower than the ocean (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_on_land_with_el...)

2. Piping salty ocean water inland will make a lot of people unhappy. It would totally change the environment that was already there.

But interesting idea. Death Valley might be a valid place for it, since it's already a salty waste land.

There isn't a significant amount of land below sea level, because most of the planet's surface is already ocean and the saddle point being below sea level will flood it. Effectively, the most significant amounts of land below sea-level are nascent rift zones that haven't connected to the ocean yet.

The sum total of significant depressions:

* Salton Sea (~21700 km², sea surface ~70 m below sea-level)

* Death Valley (~13000 km², deepest ~80m below sea-level)

* Afar Depression (~200,000 km², average ~75m)

* Qattara Depression (~20,000 km², average ~60m)

* Lake Eyre (~9500 km², lake surface ~15m)

* Dead Sea/Jordan Rift Valley (total catchment area apparently ~40000km², below sea level probably more like 10000km², Dead Sea surface ~430m)

* Turpan Depression (~50,000 km², deepest ~150m) (note: quite far from the sea)

* Caspian Sea (371,000 km², surface ~20m)

There might be one or two basins the size of Lake Eyre I'm missing in the regions of Africa, but we're getting pretty shallow and small at that point.

By comparison, the total surface area of the oceans is around 360,000,000 km² (although I think that number includes the Caspian Sea, which is basically an ocean that's been cut off from the world's oceans).

Someone with access to GIS software could probably give you a good guess for the total storage of below-sea-level places on Earth. I couldn't find any calculations in my quick searching though, but the short answer is there really isn't much storage.

It has been proposed before, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qattara_Depression_Project, but would have a minuscule effect on sea level rise. Might be worth a look as a local climate engineering method, though, should sea level rise push populations inland to less-than-ideal areas.

Sure, we could flood the Death Valley and Salton Sea in California, the Dead Sea and most of the Jordan Valley, the Afar Depression, the Caspian Sea, and large parts of the Netherlands.

The problem of course is that most of these lands are inhabited. You're just trading one parcel of land for another, one group of displaced people with another, one group of endangered species with another.

There's also the question of what you're going to do with all the salt water. You can't use it for agriculture or industry, you can't drink it, and desalination is extremely energy-intensive.

It's not a stupid idea, but you need a rather large height difference to make such a project viable.

The Dead Sea, which at 1,200 feet below sea level is the lowest spot on the planet, had a proposed project taking water from the Mediterranean in the 80's [1], and has a current project taking water from the Red Sea [2].

The current project is slated to break ground in 2018. There is no way that several hundred million cubic meters of water per year will put so much as a measurable dent in global sea levels (there is some minor concern that there will be some environment impact on the Red Sea, but in- and out-flows between the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea dwarf the volume expected to be extracted for the project by several orders-of-magnitude.

So: Good idea, has potential for hydroelectric power in various locations around the globe, but no matter what won't affect sea levels at all, unfortunately.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea%E2%80%93Dead_Sea_Water...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean%E2%80%93Dead_Sea...

A large portion of Netherlands is this way

As usual, XKCD is ahead of us: https://what-if.xkcd.com/152/