As Venezuela Collapses, Children Are Dying of Hunger(nytimes.com) |
As Venezuela Collapses, Children Are Dying of Hunger(nytimes.com) |
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/hungry-ven...
The NY Times cheered for the socialist regime, but won’t admit it.
Carefully avoids mentioning socialism. All the problems are passive voice ("as the economy collapsed," "as hyperinflation appeared") or exogenous ("oil prices collapsed").
Walter Duranty lives."
It does, however, directly badmouth the Socialists.
Socialistic Scandinavia countries that have sovereign wealth funds from their oil extraction prosper.
I suppose I should add that no, that's not because we're $ideological_flavor.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15947441 and marked it off-topic.
And again they also have no defense costs except toys to play with because the US pays for their defense.
So yeah.
Looks like the USA's determined to continue carrying out its coup after all:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Venezuelan_coup_d%27%C3%A...
No matter where you are on a continuum of socialist and capitalist policies, a fascist dictator will always lead to abuses of power. Strong democratic principles do their best to mitigate and limit that, with varying degrees of success.
Venezuela did not have a strong democratic system. Military force was used to coerce elections, the democratic process to remove Maduro was initiated, completed successfully, and ignored entirely.
The lesson here is that this can happen to any country when our democratic systems are weakened. I'd argue that the United States has been on a glacial path to this for quite some time.
IIRC Norway is, Denmark is, Sweden and Finland are not.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_in_Venezuela_(2012%E2...
[1] https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/11478
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/17/world/americas/17venezuela...
Even if it were "facts", which it isn't ("The snowflakes chant"?), factness is only one concern. Others include how relevant the "facts" are, how often they've been repeated, and what sort of discussion forms around them. There are infinitely many facts people might discuss, and very different intentions go into picking them. The intention we have here is for thoughtful discussion.