Sacramento Bee Leaks 19.5M California Voter Records(gizmodo.com) |
Sacramento Bee Leaks 19.5M California Voter Records(gizmodo.com) |
Second question - what is this spokesperson smoking?
"The spokesperson added: “We know that in databases apparently targeted, no personally identifiable information, as defined by the State of California, was involved.”"
According to California Civil Code4 §1798.80 81 "Personal information" means any information that identifies, relates to, describes or is capable of being associated with a particular individual, including, but not limited to:
● name
● telephone number
● address
● signature
● passport number
● medical information
● social security number
● insurance policy number
● bank account number
● physical characteristics or description
● driver's license or state identification card number
● credit card number, debit card number, or any other financial information
● employment or employment history
● education
● health insurance information
So exactly what information was leaked?
"It contains the voter’s name, phone number, address, gender, date of birth, political affiliation, among other election-related details."
If that's not PII, I'm a butterfly.
As to why it’s considered a public record — I imagine it’s a question about transparency. Hard for non-government entities to independently investigate election fraud if voter rolls are completely hidden.
> Under state law, access to voter data is restricted; however, journalists, political campaigns, and academic researchers can acquire the data for certain purposes.
I guess the question is, what are the "certain purposes"?
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert...
> The Bee had obtained the voter registration database from the state for reporting purposes, and it’s not the first time this information has been exposed on the public internet. The state has provided the same database to other organizations, and some of them have also been subject to attack – including a 2017 incident in which a hacker made a similarly worded demand for a Bitcoin ransom.
Campaigns of course use it to know which people to call up during voter drives. In other states, the databases are downloadable from the Secretary of States' websites.
"Shall be provided with respect to any voter, subject to the provisions of Sections 2166, 2166.5, 2166.7, and 2188, to any candidate for federal, state, or local office, to any committee for or against any initiative or referendum measure for which legal publication is made, and to any person for election, scholarly, journalistic, or political purposes, or for governmental purposes, as determined by the Secretary of State."
Looks like ultimately it's whatever the Secretary of State allows.
Posting on the web, apparently.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/22/fact-check-t...
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/24/politics/andrew-mccabe-vote/i...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/report-despite-campaign-v...