I don't know the answer but I wonder the same thing.

One intriguing view of it is: "... most popular pharmaceuticals, NSAIDs, statins, anti-depressants, anti-diabetics, etc., also have substantial antibiotic activity. Most of these pharmaceuticals started out as phytoalexins and then were found to also have pharmaceutical activity. Pharmaceuticals are just repurposed natural antibiotics. When you take an aspirin or Metformin or a statin, you are taking an antibiotic. When you take a pharmaceutical, you are selecting for multiple antibiotic resistance plasmids in your gut flora and you may be making the next superbug."

From http://coolinginflammation.blogspot.com/2014/06/antibiotic-r...

They can't force you, but if you tell someone their coworker has an amoeba they will want to know if they have it too

There is a lot of work done right now on formulation of defined faeces microbe sets, partly because most people expect that ultimately these treatments will have to be approved by the authorities. This is probably a good idea, as the microbiome consists of both bacteria, virus and eukaryote organisms, and the survey people use for 95% of all microbiome work can only capture the bacterial fraction, so a faeces transplant that look good from the bacterial perspective could potentially include nasty virus or parasites. How long this work will take is difficult to say, but years at the very least.

The second part is that right now it is somewhat unclear what is actually microbiome related problems. Clearly, associations to all kinds of diseases and conditions have been made, but the casuality and dynamics of the interaction with the immune system and host factors is not well-defined for now. It seems obvious that diseases in which we can intervene with a fecal transplant and improve an outcome are microbiome-related, but there isn't actually that many solid cases for this. C.diff infection is well-established. A recent RCT looks really promising for insulin resistance (i saw the senior author talk about it at a conference and i was certainly convinced), but naggingly insulin resistance wasn't actually the registrered primary outcome of the trial

http://www.stephanguyenet.com/microbiota-and-obesity-is-it-a...

It is actually a real thing.

Not to mention I find dog slobber to be extremely off-putting for reasons other than germs. Just like I would find it extremely off-putting if someone went up to me with a clean wet washcloth and started rubbing it on me.

This is an indicator of your conditioning.

Are mortality rates significantly lower in the modern developed world (I am assuming this is true) because people in general wash their hands more? Is that what you're trying to imply?

I don't buy it. I'd attribute the difference more to technologies like vaccines and antibiotics.