At present there is no law that criminalises mob killings. For that reason, the perpetrators are often not prosecuted by the police. A law that makes clear mob killings are unacceptable would go a long way in changing the cultural stance towards such acts.
Thankfully, the Manav Suraksha Kanoon (law to protect humans) could close this legal gap soon.
Recently the chief minister of the state of Tripura reacted to a reporter's questions on lynching by stating that there is a "wave of happiness" going on an that this is the government of the people and "people will act" and one should just embrace it. Of course later there was the usual run of the mill back tracking that he was misquoted and that he was quoted out of context -- the usual PR drill.
Its only after some repeated instances that go on for months there will be a token "we are against this" soundbyte, but just that -- a soundbyte wink wink.
India can bring in N number of laws, but without addressing enforcement, all it helps is to give a false sense of achievement to activists asking for such laws.
Also, saying "Google Engineer" and "India" really distorts what actually led to this lynching since Law and Order is the responsibility of the State Govt, and the location where this happened, is not really urban. (Police in rural areas are not equipped to handle situations like this).
I'd rather not discuss it on HN, since my knowledge of this incident is based on the front page headline on Times of India, but the gist of it is one of those 3 who was lynched, forcefully offered a chocolate/candy to a girl. Girl started crying. Now, any male stranger offering chocolates to kids forcefully, is suspicious anywhere in the world isn't it? So villagers took law into their own hands.
The OP news report on dw.com seems to be distorting the main issue here and trying to blame the central govt of India, for an issue that is purely under the jurisdiction of the state govt of Karnataka (which is in fact the opposition party in the center).
You also have to talk about the other side, in most of the cases the Police dont take any action if a local thug has the support of some big politician or bribes the police.
Lynching is the only solution people are left with.
That said, the Indian populace needs to grow up and not behave like insolent children throwing a tantrum. It should not be the job of the media companies to control what they read or don't. The more one acts towards them like protective parents shielding there eyes and ears, the more they will continue to act like tantrum throwing children -- they have nothing to lose that way, only to gain.
Catch a few, and make them public examples by throwing the book at them, they will fall in line -- but no the government will not do that because they have vested interests.
No law against murder?
Surely you're joking?
Makes me wonder the motives of persons involved - what do they gain by inciting this violence. These are not your vote banks. But considering its pan-India nature, this activity is somehow organized.
This is not a law and order problem. In the sense that it is beyond that. Those who say it do not understand the scale of mobs in India. You cannot police this, especially in places where this is occurring. The police have been helpless, even threatened.
The real problem is indeed the people of India. WhatsApp is just a medium - though it makes it very convenient. I would even say this outcome of whatsApp usage is inevitable in a country like India where you will find abundant people ready to go berserk and people who want to exploit it for no apparent reason.
Frequent reading about this really makes me loose faith in humanity. I don't know how to change a billion people.
[0] https://indianexpress.com/article/india/murderous-mob-lynchi...
The coming wave of technology and tools is only going to exacerbate these problems further.
One small thing that whatsapp could potentially do is to make it a little bit harder to forward messages to everyone. force people to wait a couple of seconds before adding another person.
Personally, I've only ever received jokes an memes that were forwarded...
"until deaths due to fake news have stopped completely" will/should never happen.
You are asking for censorship by state. Not sure how/why anyone would ask for such a measure, instead of asking the responsible state govts in India to improve the Law and Order situation.
When there's is a hint of crime or a need for medical attention, in the US, first thing a person thinks of is calling 911.
In India, first thing a person thinks of is, how he/she can address the situation, because <insert emergency service here> will never reach on time nor be of any help.
Most riots in India flame up due to false news. Whatsapp is just a medium that is super efficient in spreading such false news.
Dont shoot the Messenger/Whatsapp etc. Ask for better reforms!
One of these is not like the others.
If people feel criminals aren't prosecuted, they are more likely to take matters into their own hands.
I’m afraid democracy and the idea of universal vote will start to be influenced more and more by these people, no matter how much some other people will try to “regulate” some communication channels.
I strongly disagree. I am responsible for my actions. If I kill someone, I can’t say “well, I thought this man ate beef”.
This is a law and order problem and not something we can fix from outside India.
These lynchings are not solely a law and order problems. Indian law enforcement definitely has issues with maintaining peace and harmony but WhatsApp has considerably added to the problem. A lot of these lynchings have taken place within minutes. Before WhatsApp, it usually took a good amount of time to collect a group and target someone but these mobs assemble with 10-15 minutes, do the deed and disperse mere minutes before the police arrives.
India needs legal and administrative reforms to deal with these issues but WhatsApp can definitely put the brakes on such small mobs by merely rate limiting the group texts. At the very least, it will give the police some more time to respond.
https://in.news.yahoo.com/google-engineer-beaten-death-over-...
From this story it looks like Whatsapp was only used as a communication medium and not really the rumor mongering one. While I can understand some of the examples given the linked dw.com article, I don't see what could Whatsapp do in such cases? Should they block every offensive message?
So, for me this story sounds more like a low quality effort on part of the media. Once upon a time there used to be similar stories about how SMSes were being used for rumor mongering and spreading propaganda. And the major issue has always been ignored - education.
http://www.freepressjournal.in/india/karnataka-google-techie...
Simple would be to crowdsource reporting a post as "incendiary or fake" in a group and it wont be visible to the rest of the users in the group. or hide the message and show only after informing the reader that the message may be fake, as reported by others in the group.
Twitter does a better job than facebook in this matter. And I thought FB was way ahead with all the buzzwords like AI, ML, Neural Networks. If FB cannot add this simple feature to Whatsapp, or something similar to this, not sure it'll manage to help the lynching situation in India and world over.
Many Hindutva Organisations affiliated to RSS raise large amount of money from US tech sector each year. I request everybody to put pressure on their companies and colleagues not to donate money to racist and supremacist organisations.
So whoever is blaming Modi for this crime, has no idea how the Indian political system is structured, nor do they know how the Law and Order is the responsibility of the state, or despite knowing all that they are either feigning ignorance or spreading false propaganda.
Such lynchings have happened in India across states ruled by different political parties.
If you really want to find a solution to this problem, tone down your politics based hatred (at least on HN), and hold the respective state govts responsible for such law and order issues.
Here is an up to date chronology of lynchings under Modi https://www.thequint.com/quintlab/lynching-in-india/
Let us stand firm against hatred in the name of religion and race. Stand for democracy - stand against authoritarianism.
Casteism = Racism + Slavery
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-wo...
What is WhatsApp’s monetisation strategy in India? Is it susceptible to regulation or is the government powerless in these situations?
Although, I don't doubt the article, I would suggest you take the article with a pinch of salt. Yes, there are problems in some parts in India, but the foreign media portray it like people are running around killing and raping people, which is definitely not the case.
But maybe DW should emphasize the local aspect of these reports, like the foreign office does: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/laender/ind... Germans aren't used to a single country being that vast and diverse.
> 25 people have been killed since May
So 150 people per year, or 0.000015% of India’s population. Sure, it’s a problem, but I’m pretty sure there are bigger problems that are easier to solve (rape and acid attacks come to mind).
But that's still a tiny fraction of India's population.
India's population is so big any problem short of a rampaging plague epidemic can be dismissed with that logic.
Also it looks like a lot of these lynching's are sectarian which is a threat to the good order of the state.
This is an enormous and completely baseless leap. Why would you ever assume that the rate of killings is constant? What makes you think these killings aren't part of a rapidly growing phenomenon of social-media driven violence?
either way, this thread is not going anywhere. I'm out of this conversation, since IMO HN is not the right place.
WhatsApp isn't the problem, we Indians are and that needs fixing, not WhatsApp.
India has its problems but asking a company to do something to remedy the problem a little is too much? Lynchings happened before and they will probably continue to happen but now they are happening much more frequently and the common messaging medium is WhatsApp but somehow your argument is that the culture and government should get its shit together? In other news, water is wet.
It hasn't gotten its shit together for the past 70 years but please don't save the lives of a couple dozen or hundred people because instantaneous group chats are super precious. Let's not build a bicycle because we are busy getting to the moon! Let's pursue the utopia and not pluck the low hanging fruit!
Patriotism is much more than vapid flag waving and silencing criticism. I know your heart is in a good place but I ask a little more good faith from you.
A close analogue asking WhatsApp to self censor is that of the Govt asking women to cover up more to avoid sexual assault. Going by your comment history I am sure that's not a solution you would like.
Its the years and years of band-aid that has gotten us here. Temporary fixes will continue to perpetuate the problem just as it has in the past. Things will get a little better and then we will forget about fixing the problem.
Regarding trigger happy lynch mobs -- The more we yield to problem children throwing tantrums worse they become.
WhatsApp has done noting wrong here, I don't think the burden of the fix should be on them. Detecting fake news would be a burden. Rate limiting as you suggested would be less of a burden, unless that is what gives them competitive advantage
Well that is the second order bit, the first order bit is that Indian populace needs have faith in its Police and Govt but as you said that is not going to happen.
Truth be told, in the Akku Yadav case, I don't know how I would have reacted if I was there.
Totally agree, I really thought Modi might do something but I was wrong.
I am not asking WhatsApp to censor itself nor will I back a government which makes such demands but there are certain situations where immediate pressing needs requires drastic interventions and asking WhatsApp to assist in this is not unreasonable. I get where you are coming from and this is no doubt a band-aid but in certain situations you can't really help it. Temporary fixes are necessary to abate the violence and the Indian police has demonstrated the value of these fixes in riot hit areas by cutting off the internet access and the situation is brought rapidly under control. In an ideal world, none of this would be necessary but neither would there be poverty nor social strife.
> WhatsApp has done noting wrong here, I don't think the burden of the fix should be on them.
WhatsApp has done nothing wrong but at the very least it has exacerbated the problem. WhatsApp is a victim of its own success in India. If not WhatsApp, there would be someone else. But whoever is in such a unique and powerful position can and should shoulder some of this responsibility. You can't be oblivious to a society's needs and continue to reap all profits.
>Detecting fake news would be a burden.
Facebook already does this for the news feed so it is not something they have to set up from scratch. Plenty of organisations in India would assist in dealing with the data. Of course the end-to-end encryption would be an issue.
>Rate limiting as you suggested would be less of a burden, unless that is what gives them competitive advantage.
WhatsApp is pretty much a monopoly in India. All other apps are pretty much non-existent for a vast chunk of the population. Even if people move to other platforms, there would only be a short period of time before those platforms are forced to make the same decisions as WhatsApp.
WhatsApp could do so much more to help out but the only thing they did was to mark the "forwarded" messages. And even that was a half-hearted attempt. Small grey text on a white background which is very easy to miss. Pffftt...
And are they not aware about the "Forwarded as received" trope?
See now that we see concrete demands now we can say whether we can agree. I can absolutely get behind UI hints to help navigate users. I am not an expert on this topic. I can see how things I think of being logical or even "obvious" are anything but. I've been wrong more times
> Temporary fixes are necessary to abate the violence and the Indian police has demonstrated the value of these fixes in riot hit areas by cutting off the internet access and the situation is brought rapidly under control.
Sorry, this is a hard no for me. BART did it. You don't want to go down this road.
> Of course the end-to-end encryption would be an issue.
You don't want to go down this road either. Once again, this "solves" the wrong problem. Be very wary of anyone who claims that weakening encryption is essential to security, short-term or long-term.