Meritocracies have built amazing systems that benefit many of us. These ideals that are expressed in the negative of something that is successful don't really have a life if they kill the thing they criticize.

It's a shame that instead of creating their own projects to test out their claimed superiority, they are focused on taking over existing projects built by meritocracy.

Strange how people react to the manifesto (see GH issue tracker) to things that are not even in the text, but implied to them (somehow).

    The idea of merit is in fact never clearly defined;
    rather, it seems to be a form of recognition, an
    acknowledgement that “this person is valuable insofar
    as they are like me.”