Ask HN: Is this plagiarism? https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2015/papers/Hofmanninger_Mapping_Visual_Features_2015_CVPR_paper.pdf vs. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3276/436e8ceffa3f2ed1e4b648fbef7c85b59616.pdf |
Ask HN: Is this plagiarism? https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2015/papers/Hofmanninger_Mapping_Visual_Features_2015_CVPR_paper.pdf vs. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3276/436e8ceffa3f2ed1e4b648fbef7c85b59616.pdf |
Why?
The two papers share (part of) a picture that may or may not have been original in either paper.
I haven’t checked which paper was published earlier, but that likely is the second (it cites a 2017 paper, while the first is from a 2015 conference)