Exercise 'can prevent a cold', a study shows(bbc.co.uk) |
Exercise 'can prevent a cold', a study shows(bbc.co.uk) |
I climb rocks, and a few times I've had days where, for no reason I could explain, I have performed far above my normal abilities (1). Big days, where I've sent routes that were way above my head. Routes that I couldn't pull individual moves on when I came back to them a week later.
Then the next day I would be clobbered by a cold so violent that I'd be bedridden for an entire day.
I chalk it up to the body knowing that a cold is on the way and storing up all the immunities, defences, and reserve energy that it will need to fight it. If you time it right, you can steal all that stuff and channel it into one day of hard climbing. Of course then when the cold does come, the body has nothing to fight it with so you get crushed.
Considering how good it feels to be that on form, even just for a single session, I think it's actually worth it.
(1) If you climb, you'll know that it's a very measurable sport. If you can boulder a certain grade, you can get on a given problem and have a reasonable expectation of being able to work it out. Or alternatively, you can know for a fact that you could train on this one particular problem for an entire year and never top out. So when you're having a day like the one I describe above, it's the equivalent of showing up at the gym one day and finding you can suddenly bench press 50 pounds more than yesterday.
So it's not so far out of the ordinary to be unexpected?
In my experience, those sorts of variances are pretty common with lifting and endurance running. Especially for non-professional level athletes.
In Climbing, I know that when I'm on form I can generally get a route graded 7b+ after a couple hours of working it and a few redpoint attempts. The few 7c routes I've done each took about a dozen days of work spread out over the course of a month.
The route I did on one of my pre-cold days was rated 8a+ (though it was likely a bit overgraded), and I got it second go. Like I said, I came back a week later, and I couldn't even do the single hardest move in isolation.
So, that far out of the ordinary.
But I suspect it wasn't the cold coming on that did for me, on the one hand, more likely exposure to somebody with a new and improved bug a day or so before. And on the other hand, I'm not sure that co-workers who got to listen to me cough would have considered the run worth it.
Did they people who made the study correlate for that?
This makes an interesting contrast with other recent reporting on colds and the immune system, such as http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/05/opinion/05ackerman.html?_r... which says (correctly, AIUI) that the immediate cause of cold symptoms isn't the infection itself but the body's immune response to it.
Resolution: http://blogs.plos.org/bodypolitic/2010/10/06/how-not-to-figh... -- a more active immune system at the moment of possible infection may help you not get infected, but a more active immune system while you've got the infection may make things worse. (And: "the immune system" is a complicated thing, and the bits of it that make a cold worse may not be the same as the bits that make you less likely to get one.)
But it does seem reasonable that someone living the broadly healthy lifestyle of a person who gets a good amount of exercise would also find themselves less susceptible to colds etc...
The news article contains what (the media think) the public would want to know of the results.
The actual study (I'm not sure I can find it, but it appears to be a follow on from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497802 ) will use scientific methods to work out why this is true, not just that it is true.
I seem to recall a big discussion on this somewhere on the internet a few years ago. From what I recall, there was very little science at all to back up the theory that you catch the common cold from getting a chill. At least to me, there doesn't seem to be a logical connection between the two.
The best reason I can think of is, when it is cold, everyone tends to spend more time indoors with the doors closed, giving a virus much more opportunity to spread amongst people. Another theory had something to do with nasal linings drying up (?) in the winter, making one more susceptible to infection.
If the chill --> catching cold theory was correct, wouldn't it seem likely that when you get really cold, as in shivering your ass off uncontrollably, wouldn't you be extremely likely to catch a cold? And I know anecdotally that that simply isn't true.
Is there even a reasonably logical physiological theory to backup the chill --> catch a cold theory, or is it simply an old wives tale?