[1] https://www.zopyx.com/andreas-jung/contents/dont-use-docker-...
This website is a kind of demo screen, but not fake. Actually running Docker remotely and run containers in it.
Goid luck to the dev behind it!
Eg: https://zeyxnt8hs40zr2.docker-run.com/ https://qazf5k4ow7gpz2vq.docker-run.com/
sub-domains would works, but the container will be destroyed after 120 seconds for this demo. Of course it persist in production environment (soon).
The system is down when you tried because of disk space. I fixed it so could you try again? Sorry for the inconvenience.
Without an ecosystem of services to integrate (Identity/Storage/DB/Queue/DNS/LB/Network/etc), containers aren't awfully useful.
What is the differentiator?
EDIT: grammar
Pricing is not decided. However, current ui is sucks so will show a message soon.
Also, nginx:latest doesnt work with error WebSocket connection to 'wss://api.docker-run.com/' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 502
Sorry, in that time server is down due to disk space. I fixed it, so please try again.
This service will try to implement simple container management in production. Mainly for small start-ups, like Heroku.
The same as Heroku, provide docker-based PaaS and users would pay for their containers.
Our Marks consist of the following registered, unregistered and/or pending trademarks, service marks and logos which are subject to change without notice: Docker, Docker “Moby Dock” whale logo and the stylist representations of a container, octopus, and other entities in our original works of authorship, DOCKER HUB, RUNHUB, LIBCONTAINER, LIBTRUST, LIBCHAN, LIBSWARM, LIBPACK, DOCKER SWARM, DOCKERIZE IT, CLAY
In this case, "Docker" is the trademark we're looking at, and specifically registered with a capital D it appears
Any permitted use must not falsely imply or suggest a sponsorship or endorsement by, or a partnership or affiliation with Docker.
I don't think the author is being malicious in any way of course but from a quick glance, I couldn't say for sure that it's not a Docker product (design guidelines aside)
The Docker mark is used only in a referential context or for naming Docker or to indicate compatibility, and not in a title of a program, domain name, website, product or service
This is essentially the key distinguisher between the parent comment and the OP's site
---
Anyway, it's not so much that I'm pro-Docker or anything, it's more that they don't really have a choice legally. If companies don't protect the use of their copyrights/trademarks etc, they are diluted and risk the chance of becoming "generic". Having said that, it can definitely go overboard and lead to frivolous DMCAs, lawsuits etc etc
All this aside, while I'm not sure I have a use for the site (most things I dockerise use a compose file w/ multiple containers), it seems like a neat project so keep it up :)