This is a classic great listen with an interesting perspective. Having had listened multiple times to fill an otherwise silent void, his arguments feel geared towards those who have 100% without a doubt committed a crime, which is fine, but such advice during a routine pull over may be counterproductive.

Of course, using his example of not admitting you were going 'x' over the speed limit is obvious (not to most, though), it may be beneficial to have -some- transparency and personable traits that most often eases the situation.

At this point, you may be asking yourself how this could possibly ease a scenario as such... Well, here's the thing - if someone were pulled over (no matter what cause)and acted as many 'Sovereign Citizens' do, it can be expected without a doubt that escalation will occur due to insubordination. It's a very fine line, and honestly may be a gamble depending on the encounter premise, who the official is, and where you are located.

In short: Think before you speak :)

Previous discussions:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15886628

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6001859

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=219758

Edit: Fix URL

Keep in mind there are exceptions to this rule like:

* If you kill someone in self defense. (You need an affirmative defense. Hence why training like Massad Ayoob is important)

* Giving your license when asked.

* Implied consent for DUI tests (If you are sober it's best to submit to these otherwise you lose your license)