'Reconstruction' begins of stone age lands lost to North Sea(theguardian.com) |
'Reconstruction' begins of stone age lands lost to North Sea(theguardian.com) |
Presumably the sea level rose slowly, so nobody lost their lives. Yes, technically “catastrophic”, in the sense of comprehensively wiping everything out, but not rapid onset.
I was told by a geologist that the SF Bay Area coastline used to be a few hundred meters further west than it is now, and was also inhabited. However that region sank beneath the waves in an earthquake so likely that was a rapid catastrophe
(In which case, the flooding might have been relatively fast.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storegga_Slide
It's also a big patch of territory. It's not obvious how it worked politically, and how open surrounding areas would have been to exiles/refugees.
The TL:DR is that eight thousand years ago the UK and continental Europe were connected by land (now under the North Sea) that was probably inhabited by humans for thousands of years.
A lot of the ancient history of Europe could be under there. It's exciting to see it getting more attention.
The Roman description of "The Saxon Shore" may simply because it was already inhabited by Angles and Saxons - the seas being the ancient world's highways.