The first thing I thought of was 'oooh, maybe put a pic on the landing page of this website I help out with' but I can't search for e.g. 'chess' or whatever theme I want.
The whole point of the site is to annotate the photos, but then to not make them searchable by annotation? Shame!
Until then, though, just change the word in the tag (with hyphens for multiple words), e.g.:
https://taken.photos/tags/chess/ https://taken.photos/tags/tabletop-game/
A tree with a mountain in the background.... completely ignoring the house which is the central focus of the photo.
https://taken.photos/photos/tree-with-mountain-in-background...
or the aforementioned "A cat sitting on top of each other"
I'm thinking this is a great _starting point_ a way to bulk ingest lots of photos, but as a resource i'm going to loose faith in it every time i see an obvious AI screw up. Technically yes, they're still useful titles that help (well, they would help if you had a search which I can only assume you're planning because otherwise what's the point) but _emotionally_ i'm going to be "yeah but they're always wrong" (even if it's not true)
This is the state of modern AI. Mostly it's still utter garbage.
A zebra standing on top of a building https://taken.photos/photos/zebra-standing-on-top-of-buildin...
some of these are comedy gold :)
Surprisingly MS does much better than Google and their https://cloud.google.com/vision/
I tried both and got frustrated with almost random results from Google.
The 'curated collection' statement means 'there is no adult or NSFW' content. AI does great job with detecting nudity, and as a pragmatic person I decided to keep all scraped adult content and have it served at https://nudes.best/