The site claims the following as fact. I’d like to see the research proving this but the click-through link to the “full appeal” where I hope they’re listed didn’t work for me (timed out).

> ... numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.

>>The recourse to the EU's Precautionary Principle to stop the distribution of 5G products appears too drastic a measure. We first need to see how this new technology will be applied and how the scientific evidence will evolve.

This is so facetious. The Precautionary Principle is always going to appear a drastic measure - that is its purpose - to be used for large-scale changes like this that are difficult to reverse (another example being GMO).

Has this been answered in part by:

> Does 5G pose health risks? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48616174

Linked page archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20191021123733/http://www.5gappe...

Full appeal archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20191002000712/https://www.5gapp...

The website is down

https://web.archive.org/web/20191020205431/http://www.5gappe...

Yes, let's go to 6G (or was it 7G?) satellites directly.