CDC Unpublished Data Comparing Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Obtained via FOIA [pdf]

CDC Unpublished Data Comparing Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Obtained via FOIA [pdf](childrenshealthdefense.org)

4 points by mindfulgeek 6 years ago | 4 comments

loons2 6 years ago |

The title is essentially clickbait... which doesn't negate the content.

I didn't go through and look at all of them, but here are 4 of the source studies which certainly didn't require any FOIA. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240701806501 https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2010.519317 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1778/455098 https://www.ebiomedicine.com/article/S2352-3964(17)30046-4/a...

gus_massa 6 years ago |

Most of the slides are cherrypicked articles in PubMed. Is there some new information?

mindfulgeek 6 years ago | |

The slides that state they were unpublished and obtained via FOIA. The first slide is one example and there are more as you scroll.

gus_massa 6 years ago | | |

The first one is the abstract of:

> Verstraeten, T., Davis, R. L., Gu, D., & DeStefano, F. (2000). Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine in first month of life. In Proceedings of the Epidemic Intelligence Service Annual Conference (Vol. 49). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

If you want a better link to read it: http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/00mmdd_EISAbstractSubmissi...

I thinks it's not necessary to get if by a FOIA. Asking nicely for the 2000 year proceeding should be enough.

It's not unpublished data of the CDC. Someone send a poster or small presentation for a conference. The peer review before the conference varies a lot, in some conferences it is very strict, in other it is almost inexistent. Is the full data analysis published somewhere?

They found ~4000 kids with problems. How many unvaccinated kids with problems can you find in Canada in the '90 to compare?