> Disclosure: The writer owns Microsoft stock and holds no shares in Amazon.

On the one hand, this would be a reasonable investment strategy if one sincerely believed in the stuff she's saying. On the other hand, the things she's saying would be strategically correct given her holdings.

A bit of a credibility chicken-and-egg.

This article goes completely off the rails fairly fast. It is meant to be an article about a DoD contract but brings up global cloud coverage (for the DoD in the US?), HoloLens (???), and hybrid cloud without a real justification for why any of that would be relevant to the topic at hand.

This is a low quality article with a clickbait title. There's no substance here. It almost feels like an article written by a bot splicing different generic company information together.

That is asinine to say AWS doesn't do hybrid cloud, or that hybrid cloud means AWS Outposts. AWS has a whole suite of services for building hybrid clouds and bringing cloud ops to data centers. Hybrid cloud for Azure has mostly been a sales strategy for MS to sell cloud services to their existing customer base. AWS has 50% marketshare of cloud services compared to Azure's 15%.

The writer is a typical stock speculator not a real technical analyist. This is just another mesh of buzzwords to get stocks going for momentum trading

Fairly and squarely. Pentagon contact. FFS.

I'm not sure I'd trust something standing the test of time based on Donald Trumps decisions ;-)