Coping with Flexbox(kgrz.io) |
Coping with Flexbox(kgrz.io) |
That suffering might be due to an unmet desire: that you should get fluency but not require training. As a programmer, you might feel that human repetition is a sign that something needs to be built to prevent that repetition. But, if you talk to a teacher, sports coach, martial artist, or anyone else who works in the domain of training meat-based deep neural nets to solve problems quickly and confidently, you'll find this is false. If you are seeking a feeling of speed and confidence, embrace repetition.
Perhaps, play https://flexboxfroggy.com/ 10 times.
Maybe a tool like this necessarily needs a bunch of practice. Or maybe it's badly designed, and the experience should be more like chopping a carrot.
Some people expect their brain to answer a question like "I want to make this particular box's children evenly vertically-spaced. What is the name of the css property to google?" with a confident sub-second response. Some people, upon observing that they can't, feel like a fool.
For those people, it is relevant.
--------
> Maybe a tool like this necessarily needs a bunch of practice. Or maybe it's badly designed, and the experience should be more like chopping a carrot.
I'd like to live in a world where every tool thats the best for a job is well-designed.
I'd also like to live in a world every message I try to communicate is one that people pay attention to and understand in the spirit I intended, even if I never edit it.
I'd also like to live in a world where my lumbar region is pain-free, even if I don't regularly do squats.
---------
The author's words about his pain points are still valuable. Systems should be improved. They can't be improved unless problems are made clear. There is much broken in the world and many of us have taken up the call to fix it and we should heed the words of others' frustration.
But there is much broken in the world that won't get fixed anytime soon.
I've been trying to improve my css lately and have found Kevin Powell's content on YouTube great[0].
Eventually I caved and purchased his course[1]. It was initially just to support him, as he has so much premium, free content out there that had benefitted me, but I'm actually going through it and (at least for me) learning faster than by just passively watching youtube videos.
I'm finding it pretty well structured and a good progression from flexbogfroggy.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/user/KepowOb [1] https://www.kevinpowell.co/courses/
Tools in development are written _by_ people _for_ people. They are crafted to be the way they are, and once you hit a certain level of abstraction above the performance layers I think its assumed that the tool should be easy to use.
When you're designing tools, this is relevant.
When you're using tools that have been agreed-upon by committee, it is not.
I can never keep align-items vs justify-content vs align-content vs justify-items straight and this helps (although it's missing the last one, maybe that only applies to grids).
I wish this existed when I tried flexbox the first few times…
I don't even bother with justify-content anymore, elements with flex-grow combined with min-width and max-width pretty much cover all my required "layout" use cases.
flex-grow:0;
flex-shrink:0;
flex-grow:1;
flex-shrink:1;
As someone who's done web development since the late 1990's, I offer my very highest praise and unreserved recommendation for an extraordinarily thorough, coherent and practical resource I only recently discovered: https://every-layout.dev
Its "Axiomatic CSS" is, finally, a standards-based solution that provides a solid foundation for truly responsive layout and design.
https://internetingishard.com/html-and-css/flexbox/
I think often it is about finding a guide by an author who happens to explain things in the way that clicks with you. For me, this one really helped.
For example, I was recently implementing a “small multiples” layout, showing many small charts of the same type, with the exact number depending on context. This seems like an ideal use case for flexbox: you can make good use of your available screen width, with everything lining up neatly, even spacing, but still wrapping to extra rows as needed.
Alas, it doesn’t always work quite like that. For example, suppose that we have a display that is wide enough to fit five items and we have 16 items to show. I don’t really want a layout with 5+5+5+1 items; using 4+4+4+4 would look much neater, without needing any more space. Unfortunately, while typographers have been wrangling with this sort of problem for a long time, flexbox doesn’t have any awareness of it at all.
OK, so I have to live with 5+5+5+1 for now if I want to use flexbox. In that case, it would be nice to control the justification of the final line, for example having additional items lining up under the left-most columns above them. Unfortunately, this also isn’t something that flexbox supports. With most settings for justify-content, my lonely last item is going in the centre of its row, whether I want it to or not. Even worse, if I add another item, the two on that final row will be correctly spaced according justify-content within their own row in isolation, but that isn’t necessarily going to align at all with the columns of items on the rows above.
These kinds of limitations do significantly reduce the usefulness of flexbox, IMHO. With CSS grids also now widely supported, I find there aren’t actually that many situations where flexbox is the best tool for the job.
My understanding of this description may be incorrect. If not, this is supported in flexbox.
This pen is editable so the HTML list can contain 16 items (5+5+5+1) and I think it works for what you're describing. [0] [1]
[0] https://www.w3schools.com/css/tryit.asp?filename=trycss3_fle...
Append n dummy items to your list, where n is the maximum number of items you expect on a single line. They should have a height of 0, and the same width / margin as your regular items.
The "2D justification" where items occupy space intelligently would be awesome, but I doubt CSS will ever allow that.
I don’t ever want to touch flexbox again after learning css grid
I think what is really needed here is an extra property specifying how to handle the last row (or column for vertical flex) of the layout that is separate to the normal justify-content property but takes the positions of items in the preceding rows (columns) into account, roughly analogous to the subgrid concept for CSS grids.
I don’t think the “2D justification” problem would be that difficult to solve either. Again, it just needs a single extra property, in this case to specify whether and how to balance item counts across all rows (or columns, depending on flex direction). A simple approach would just repeatedly shorten all of the preceding rows by one item and add the same total number of items to the final row until doing so again would make the last row longer than the rest. Then redistribute the horizontal space throughout according to the normal justification, which at least minimises the difference between the number of items in the final row and the rest without needing any extra space for the overall layout.
A slightly more sophisticated treatment might offer a third option that can shorten more than just the final row, distributing any difference in item counts over multiple rows instead. For example, 5+5+5+2 would become 5+4+4+4. In this way, you would at worst have a set of earlier rows and a set of later rows where the item counts differed by no more than 1. Presumably you would also then apply the final row justification property imagined above to all rows in the later set, if you don’t have the same number of items in all rows.
Maybe in the future we’ll see a Flexbox Level 2 spec that addresses issues like these, just as subgrid is coming with level 2 of the grid layout spec.
The items are governed by flexbox and adding, for example
> align-items: flex-end;
My point is that flex readily handles the use case you describe. Elsewhere in this subthread (5+4+4+4 distribution), you also deem flexbox incapable but I can think of how a frontend developer could make it work.
Perhaps you are unintentionally looking for instances where flexbox cannot do something and then imposing constraints where flexbox is not an appropriate tool. However, if you think in terms of flexbox, some of these scenarios actually have handy and elegant solutions.
YMMV
Yes, but since you aren’t using any of the flex-related properties other than flex itself and wrapping, the layout you’re building isn’t substantially different from normal block-based layout and wrapping.
My point is that flex readily handles the use case you describe.
If we took your example and added some flex-specific behaviour, say justify-content:space-around, how could we readily left-align the final items with flexbox here?
Elsewhere in this subthread (5+4+4+4 distribution), you also deem flexbox incapable but I can think of how a frontend developer could make it work.
It’s difficult to discuss that when haven’t shown us what you have in mind. Would you like to elaborate?
Perhaps you are unintentionally looking for instances where flexbox cannot do something and then imposing constraints where flexbox is not an appropriate tool.
I would prefer to say that flexbox would be a more useful tool if it could also handle these finer details. There are numerous blog posts and SO questions about limitations in the current version of flexbox and how to work around them, so I think it’s fair to say that the challenges I’ve described here are not unusual.
I'm trying to think of an example where one would "justify-content:space-around" and want the last line to align left. Curious.
I agree flexbox has limitations but I don't see them in the examples you've provided thus far.
This is not much of an elaboration but the 5+4+4+4 I'm thinking along the lines of changing margin of nth children, or even specifically adjusting the CSS for the fifth child.
When developing front-end, I'm sure you would use the most appropriate tool for the design at hand. Flexbox even with its limitations is sometimes the best choice. I also agree it could use use refinements, but whatever refinements it needs aren't apparent to me in the examples you've described.
This may be a failure of my imagination.
My original example would suffice. Given a large number of small charts to be displayed, typically all of the same size, it seems quite reasonable to want them to be evenly distributed and to adapt automatically to use the available horizontal space, but for an incomplete final line to fill from the left under the items in rows above. (Please remember that this is what was meant by aligning to the left in this context; we’re not talking about literally aligning on the left margin without reference to the extra space added by flexbox here.) The alternatives available with the current flexbox behaviour tend to be things like putting a single chart in the centre or putting two charts on the far left and far right with a possibly huge space between them, which inevitably leave the items in the last line looking arbitrarily placed and disconnected from the rows above.
This is not much of an elaboration but the 5+4+4+4 I'm thinking along the lines of changing margin of nth children, or even specifically adjusting the CSS for the fifth child.
But how do you know in advance which n you need? The primary advantage of flexbox in this sort of situation is that your many items will use up the available display width while also being neatly spaced. If you know your exact horizontal sizes in advance, you don’t really need flexbox at all for this kind of layout, since again you can just choose suitable margins and/or padding on your items and then rely on simpler layout tools like inline blocks.
Something like n rows have m items and the total number of items is (n * m) + 1. And you want the first (m+1)th item to be in row 1.
Yes, you’d be wasting your time with flexbox. You’d also be wasting your time complaining flexbox doesn’t support this.
To be clear, I don’t see a spec in any of the exceptions you’re carving, and you’re not providing one, just saying “flexbox can’t do this”.
You’re right. it can’t.
I’m not sure whether you’ve read my comments elsewhere in this discussion, but the short version is that this is about balancing the number of items in each row while not requiring any extra space compared to the naïve layout. Formally, the goal might be to minimise the maximum pairwise difference between the number of items in the rows, subject to not using more rows than the existing flexbox behaviour and keeping any longer rows earlier in the order. My earlier example assumed all items had the same size, but this isn’t a requirement for flex items and the balancing concept could be generalised by taking into account item sizes and flex settings instead of just looking at the counts.
Good typesetting can vary spacing and possibly hyphenation to give a balanced look to a paragraph, and somewhat complicated algorithms exist to do this well. It doesn’t seem an exotic requirement to have similar attention to detail in laying out flexed content in 2D, and it would certainly allow results that look better than what often happens today.
I've not looked at your comments elsewhere in this discussion, but this makes sense as a specification.