Apple dumps Intel from laptop lines

Apple dumps Intel from laptop lines(semiaccurate.com)

16 points by kux 15 years ago | 13 comments

Sidnicious 15 years ago |

“Apple dumps Intel from laptop lines” is a bold headline for what at this point is a rumor, no?

Especially from a site named "Semiaccurate." ;)

Kidding aside, this doesn't make much business sense. A lot of people buy Macs and run Windows alongside OS X because their work requires Windows. Why would Apple remove that whole segment of the market from their purchasers just to save a few bucks on the chips? I don't think they will.

I also think this is slightly unlikely because it would probably require substantial investment in rewriting a lot of the plumbing for OS X (I don't know much about it).

And even further, why would they work on building their own chips like the A4/5 and then put in the effort to end up using someone else's? If anything, they'll either switch to something else just in the MBA's or you'll see A* chips in there or something.

kux 15 years ago | | |

Keep in mind Microsoft is also working on porting Windows to ARM. Ideally there would be some form of Windows 8 able to run on the new Mac's by the time the architecture transition occurs.

mieses 15 years ago | | |

i wouldn't knock semiaccurate if this is the first time you've heard of them (him?).

mthomas 15 years ago | |

Also, they would have to recompile and test all their existing applications on the ARM architecture. It was a big deal when they switched from PowerPC to Intel.

I guess that this would make sense if they started making laptops running iOS.

prodigal_erik 15 years ago | | |

I think laptops running iOS are very likely. They saved the company by discovering that appliances for consumers are more profitable than tools for human beings, and this way it doesn't much matter that they've never been able to compete on manufacturing efficiency with commodity computer hardware.

Mostly it bugs me that ARM is seeing more and more use yet I still can't drive up the street and buy one on a motherboard. Freezing out hobbyists is an alarming step backwards for the industry.

andrerobot 15 years ago |

Really?

Moving away from the X86 instruction set 5 years after the move PowerPC is NOT going to happen, period. ARM is fine for the iPad, but for high performance work it doesn't cut it.

ARM tech & Intel have proven that they can scale, but only Intel has the performance advantage for years to come.

And come on! Fragment the Mac market in laptops with ARM and workstations with Intel chips is a really bad move. The only laptop that would have an ARM chip would be an iPad with a keyboard.

kux 15 years ago | |

The transition would occur in 2014 or later. By that point in time we will have quad core 64-bit ARM A15's or better.

x86 will have have lasted 8+ years at Apple, which I think is reasonable when you consider how much Apple products have changed since x86 was adopted.

phamilton 15 years ago | |

I think ARM is developing fine for high performance work. Nvidia's Denver is probably going to be half GPU anyway, so parallel workloads will thrive on their ARM chip.

I also think a RISC instruction set is starting to look pretty nice, since (as I understand it) x86 chips break CISC instructions down to RISC-like micro-ops anyway. Why not move that process off the die (where space, power and thermal requirements are strict) into the compiler.

The transition away from PowerPC wasn't that tough in reality. If anything, it told Apple that such a change is very possible. With Windows 8 coming to ARM, it's not that big of a deal for Apple to follow suit.

greyfade 15 years ago | | |

Yes, most implementations of x86 translate opcodes into equivalent RISC-like micro-ops.

But this was necessary to achieve any kind of real performance with x86. It's a terribly-designed architecture where all of the instructions are scattered all over the map. There's no unifying design, and most operations that should be simple to implement require scads of silicon. Much of the power wasted on x86 chips is in that instruction decode hardware. It's terribly inefficient. (It's also a horrible instruction set to deal with.)

kux 15 years ago |

Apple has significant motivation to ditch x86 now that Intel has an effective monopoly in high end x86 chips. Intel's fab process is 2+ years ahead of the fabs used AMD and ARM competitors though, so Apple switching architectures will only make sense in the long run.

ARM competes because of a more power efficient architecture; however, this difference is less of an issue if Intel's fab process can get farther ahead of the competition.

In short term(next 4 years) Intel's lead fab lead will likely continue to grow, because Intel switched to Tri-Gate(FinFET) at the 22nm node while TSMC and others will not adopt similar technologies until 16nm node(2014 or later).

maxharris 15 years ago |

Well, that's fine if it's true. If it makes my next Mac even lighter, or have a longer battery life, that's a good reason to do it. Honestly, I don't care what ISA is used, and most people probably won't. Everything on the Mac app store will port over pretty easily, so doing this will be even easier than it was in 2005. All of the software I write nowadays is portable, so I don't care even from that perspective (Python, Ruby and Javascript, etc. run on anything). For me, this is about as much of a non-event as a switch to a different GPU or RAM supplier.

r00fus 15 years ago | |

As long as the XCode toolchain exists on such devices (ie, they are full dev devices), I would be more than thrilled to switch architectures with a new MacbookARM.