Great SaaS Demos Enabled by DevOps Tools

Great SaaS Demos Enabled by DevOps Tools(releasehub.com)

55 points by regiswilson 5 years ago | 14 comments

chatmasta 5 years ago |

I enjoyed the post, and the startup looks cool as well. I can clearly see the pain point. I think it will be a challenge positioning this product, because in order for a customer to be able to use it, presumably they already need relatively mature DevOps pipelines, in order to give Release(Hub?) something they can deploy/manage. And if I already have automated builds and a CI pipeline, is it really that much more work to automate sandbox deploys as well? Why wouldn't I deploy to my own infra, or some hosted k8s service, or GitLab Auto-DevOps?

I'm sure you've thought about this challenge, so I'm curious what your plans are in terms of adding value outside of "deploy to sandbox" workflows that can be replicated by CI tools and cloud providers (keep in mind that VC-funded startups, presumably your ideal customer, often have $100k+ in cloud credits to burn through). I see data snapshots, so that's a start maybe. But are you working on anything that will be hard to replicate?

(Also, unrelated, but I love the design!)

ksm1717 5 years ago |

Does anyone get any use out of chat bot corner pop ups other than feeling patronized? You could create one that calls your users names or responds with middle finger emojis and nobody would notice.

tommy_mcclung 5 years ago | |

On our blog it has been pretty good to get newsletter signups. We tried just having a 'subscribe to our newsletter' section but no one filled that out. I moved it over to Intercom as an experiment and it actually worked. For our main site it's barely worth it... we get a few questions here and there.

k__ 5 years ago |

A good DevOps pipeline is generally a good investment.

It might seem like the cherry on top, but being able to move fast and safely break things makes development more fun, not just for the developers.

grumblestumble 5 years ago |

This is an advertisement for a service disguised as an informative article. The info it provides is pretty basic and it's just farming clicks for signups from HN.

ianpurton 5 years ago |

I only do video demonstrations now, even internally.

They go a lot quicker as I can edit out unnecessary typing etc. Then there's no need to be on site and do a demo just send a link.

tommy_mcclung 5 years ago | |

That works for some use cases, but what I've found makes the best demo is to ask the potential customer what pain points they are experiencing and then I cater my demo exactly to their pain points. Making the demo interactive helps get the prospect to engage. When I get the customer talking it's amazing what they will tell you and the demo can take better shape.

chrisweekly 5 years ago |

FTR, this is not about great demos that happen to have been enabled by devops tools -- it's about "ReleaseHub" which can (among other things) help in the creation of great demos. I almost skipped the article bc of this ambiguity. HTH

andrewfromx 5 years ago | |

Oh c’mon I thought it was well written and NOT just a sales pitch for the product. The author clearly had experiences to share and this product demonstrated a solution.

chrisweekly 5 years ago | | |

I agree! It's too late to edit my comment for clarity, but I'm glad I read the OP. It's not "just" a sales pitch.

ProAm 5 years ago |

Do people really need a tool to do this? This is tech sales 101. Everyone does this.

sokoloff 5 years ago | |

Everyone most certainly does not do this.

Source: I’ve seen a lot of demos that would have benefited from this and am responsible for a group who is not yet doing this, but needs to begin doing so. (I agree it’s elementary tech sales, but it might 201 level as a lot of places succeed without it; we’ve been selling to semi-captive internal customers so long that we didn’t prioritize this. Other companies clearly get by without this as well, even to fully arms-length customers.)

k__ 5 years ago | | |

I worked with a bunch of startups and none of them did this.