All desktop calculators are wrong, so I had to build my own(chachatelier.fr) |
All desktop calculators are wrong, so I had to build my own(chachatelier.fr) |
Otherwise it’s wolfram alpha[2], but that needs internet.
I never type calculations in any search engines, but that’s way too slow compared to speedcrunch.
Maybe I feel similarly to chalk using a web view compared to how electron apps are seen by some.
Displaying inaccuracies is neat! As well as the graphing parts!
[1]: https://speedcrunch.org/ [2]: https://www.wolframalpha.com/
> I hate CSS...In good old days, I would have used a table
In case you didn't know and if it's of any help, CSS has gotten a lot better compared to e.g. 6 years ago. Today, CSS grids[1][2] and flexbox[3][4] make layouts a lot simpler and are pretty well supported[5][6]. I think you might find using a CSS grid easier than a table for layout.
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Grid_La...
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/CSS_layou...
[3] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Flexibl...
[4] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/CSS_layou...
Considering the topic of the article, large number of digits and overflow were not supposed to be a problem with Chalk :-D