I want to open a discussion on the quality of content served by YCombinator in recent past.

I fell some of the articles submitted were a useless ramblings by a low paid content churner and didn't deserve the time I devoted clicking on it, glancing and then rejecting it.

I usually use the rss feed to get the links rather than visiting the website and going through top marked contents, but in general i feel content included in hacker news should go through a more rigorous process than being followed currently.

- A