No copyrights on any content (NSFW)(github.com) |
No copyrights on any content (NSFW)(github.com) |
Saying "everyone is beautiful" is like say "everyone smells good". Is simply not true and the rest is just a language trick. It does not mean the same as "everyone smells good to someone". Which would still be a assumption without any proof that is only probably true because of the sheer number of people that exist.
We create 3D models of human genitals with the aim to:
break taboos
educate at a global level
improve body self-image for all users
We aim to enable educators to do the same by making the 3D models freely available for viewing online and for downloading and printing under the CC0 license.
Because, as it stands, I'm not sure the benefit of having a bunch of purple penises. They certainly don't look realistic.
If you like something that is not to “scary”, then get something more playful and make it rainbow-colored, thermochromic or better: glow in the dark. There is a reason why most sex toys (for women) are not flesh colored.
If you want to create an educational model for adults, textured would be nice.
Try the same colored model for sex ed in school and you will have very interesting conversations with concerned parents. In that case, you might also be better off with a color gradient or an unusual color (orange, green, blue, UV active).
And that way, you elegantly avoid traps that involve racial stereotypes.
Try it on wearebeautiful.info, the render engine allows you to change the color of any model you pick.
Is there something more to this question than it appear at first?
I'm also interested in simulation and movement. How SHOULD one capture the default shape and characteristics of a complicated soft structure in order to properly simulate it under gravity or other forces? Creating realistic stretching that takes into account the internal differences between ligaments and flesh for instance, could be an entire field of study.
I'm excited to see where this leads in the future.
But if you are interested in the shifting of the skin/genitals in different positions, then take a close look at the models and especially their “code” (the model names encode body alignment during the scan).
There is also a comparison of a flaccid and an erected penis. Or different stages of a pregnancy. And a vulva comparison that shows arousal and the “relaxed” state.
Our compound models are truly the most interesting ones:
- https://wearebeautiful.info/model/426060-VLNP-2 - https://wearebeautiful.info/model/426060-VLNP - https://wearebeautiful.info/model/746625-VLNP-2
Sadly, this project doesn't have a future. This HN post has gathered the most interest in the project yet. A clickbait headline got people to look, nothing else. :(
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28350174
Best of luck.
Also "If you're wondering why we have the collection of models we have, see our model diversity statement for more details. " https://wearebeautiful.info/docs/model-diversity
That's my guess.
/s
Those who don't need it, love it. Those who need it the most, won't look at it.
<lolsob>
Life gets easier if you don't take that fact personally and just see it as a logistical issue.
- Probably out of budget
- Even if it’s not, subject to bias
Why not use a skin tone that’s not likely to be identified with by anyone? If we taught kids to put condoms on a banana they can figure it out.
Making educational wieners racially diverse is a fool’s errand.
> Why not use a skin tone that’s not likely to be identified with by anyone? If we taught kids to put condoms on a banana they can figure it out.
> Making educational wieners racially diverse is a fool’s errand.
I mean maybe, but then why _not_ just use a banana? It just seems odd to go for extreme realism except for the color.