Tesla Q3 2021 Vehicle Production and Deliveries(ir.tesla.com) |
Tesla Q3 2021 Vehicle Production and Deliveries(ir.tesla.com) |
0: https://insideevs.com/news/460036/tesla-shut-down-model-s-x-...
1: https://tesla-cdn.thron.com/static/1LRLZK_2020_Q4_Quarterly_...
2: https://twitter.com/DirtyTesla/status/1443543167098359813
There is also the absurdity of spending $100k+ on an asset that depreciates so heavily. My spouse and I make enough money to afford this car without much thought, but there isn’t a chance in hell I’d light that much money on fire.
To be fairrrr, only people that have range anxiety are those that listen to the oil and gas industry.
I expect that around 900k Teslas will be produced and sold in 2021. The new factories easily bring that up to something around 1.8m-2m in 2022.
At present, Toyota produces something on the order of 10m gasoline vehicles per year, and roughly zero EVs.
Musk's approach for both Tesla and SpaceX seem to be a very effective to effectively push into a new domain if you have the money and the guts to try. It will be interesting to watch how they evolve over time.
And let's not get into the profit margins which is way better than ICE :)
https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/general-motors/2021/1...
Tesla had automotive revenues of 19 billion usd in the first two quarters of 2021.
[0] https://twitter.com/snazzyq/status/1434936396096028674?s=21
What's Uber's stock price and valuation after burning $30 billion dollars and still not turning a profit? (Uber picked in particular because I'm familiar with their financials)
1. How long has Tesla been manufacturing vs Rivian
2. How does Tesla compare to Toyota
I feel it's all apples and oranges both ways. They're all in different manufacturing maturity place
That's true, but the electric car race began with the Model 3 and is going to continue to outpace Rivian 50x next year if the volume expectation are correct [on both sides]. Rivian coming out with these cars is unlikely to capture much of the market anyways, given they're both over $65k. It's like Rivian's 10 years behind Tesla in maturity (besides their range figures), and their only saving grace might be the Amazon electric delivery vehicle contract.
Most "competitors" are just buying batteries\electronics from a vendor and shoving it in.
Tesla partnered with Panasonic and created their own custom modules(2170), now they plan to do everything with the newly announced 4680(from raw materials to products).
They are truly unmatched.
Not all automakers have done things that way though, and other automakers are able to complete with Ford. Vertical integration can sometimes be an asset, other times the "Not Invented Here" culture proves limiting. Tesla's had incredible success thus far, but we probably need a couple more decades to see if they maintain their first mover advantage or if other players end up being more agile and more successful.
0: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a23478147/ford-river-rouge...
At some point electric drivetrains and batteries will be available in large quantities from suppliers just like gasoline motors and gearboxes are available now.
As soon as that is the case, there will be many dozens of different car models that compete with Tesla.
Teslas vertical integration is an advantage now, because they don't have to wait for suppliers to develop what they need. But once suppliers have caught up, I'm not sure if Teslas edge holds.
Why is that?
I'd like a figure for the split of retail and organized money in Tesla.
I mean, all I'm saying is, that there's a reason Tesla is a meme stock.
The first two quarters are much slower for car sales; for example in 2020, Tesla shipped 178k units in Q1+Q2 and 319k units in Q3+Q4.
Tesla had sales of 31.5B in 2020, and have 73% growth between Q3 2020 and 2021, which indicates they could hit 50B in 2021, and could hit close to 90B in 2022 if they continue the same YoY growth. Nissan is stagnant. It's reasonable to assume that Tesla is on track to surpass Nissan next year (2022).
This accusation is false.
Uber will survive as long as there are investors willing to believe they might be profitable, eventually. Once the consensus or shared belief turns, I believe they’ll face significant challenges raising capital in the market.
The 408 ratio is justified by the assumption that earnings will be a lot higher in coming decades.
There's many people here who hate on Tesla, but when seeing YouTube videos of Tesla owners posting footage of self-driving I'm constantly amazed and perplexed how far they have come and how intelligent the car appears to be. There's obviously edge cases where it fails and will be hard to iron out, but it definitely doesn't seem impossible based on countless of videos I have seen. It's amazing and I don't understand how anyone can reject this as a major advance in technology and where humanity will eventually arrive.
As to your dismissive "galaxy brains at Tesla": unlike Ford or GM or Toyota, Tesla does a lot of R&D in battery cells.
I know that because they are hiring tons of people for cell research and production: https://www.tesla.com/careers/search/?country=US&query=cell
I did similar searches in the past so I know that they've been hiring for cell research for years.
For contrast, despite GM claiming they make Ultium batteries, few months back I didn't find a single job post for cell engineering.
I also know that because Tesla has been sponsoring Canadian cell research lab led by Jeff Dahn.
This resulted in multiple patents awarded to Tesla.
Tesla also bought Grohman Engineering (which makes, among other things, robots that assemble battery packs), Maxwell (for their dry electrode technology) and a Canadian manufacturer of equipment for making battery cells.
Musk also talked how they work with every company that claims they have an improved cell technology and how they evaluate their cells.
There is no evidence that Ford or GM or Toyota made similar investments in batter cell and battery pack R&D and production.
Panasonic was crucial at the begining with their own designed\made 18650. their role is shrinking fast
Tesla's expertise when it comes to batteries is unmatched in the auto-motive industry, no doubt about that.
Tesla is not using Panasonic at all for their new batteries.
"""Under our arrangement with Panasonic, we plan to purchase the full output from their production equipment at negotiated prices … Currently, we rely on suppliers such as Panasonic for these cells."""
Seriously, there is no shame in it. They are good batteries! They are made by Panasonic using Panasonic chemistry on Panasonic equipment, though.
Tesla do have their own custom chemistry and doping, it is written all over the internet you're willing to read that.
TEsla has several patents and their own research group: https://www.scribd.com/document/440951044/Tesla-battery-pate...
https://www.scribd.com/document/424878572/J-Electrochem-Soc-...
just to name a few. to me you seem like a Tesla skeptic, unwilling to acknowledge their success
Do people remember how much shit Tesla went through?
0: https://insideevs.com/news/536753/rivian-r1t-gvwr-heavy-duty...
[0]https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1133704_review-rivian-r...
200Kwh * 40K = 8Gwh?!
that's unrealistic, battery production is the single most limiting factor for all EV's.
big batteries = low volumes
It is extremely hard to predict 15 years from now but the next five years?
There are no competitors(perhaps besides Chinese battery makers) everyone is still in early R&D\prototype phases.
Looks like some of this has been studied by Harvard Business School: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=45289
Anyhow, you tout Tesla's deep work in batteries, motors and electronics (and let's not forget glass, doors, seats and other areas where Tesla has decided not to out-source). I can see where another company might be the GM to Tesla's Ford - finding success buying some of the right bits and pieces rather than spending an insane amount of money (re-)inventing them for themselves.
We need to advance the technology which is still not good enough for our global needs, but knowing where these two are.... I'm skeptical
0: https://insideevs.com/news/508674/battery-capacity-ford-f150...
1: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.0341813jes/pdf
Undoubtedly good chemistry research but doesn't have anything to do with the batteries that are actually in cars you can actually buy.
Claiming Tesla is the same as VW which basically buys batteries and shoves them into existing chassis\frames, is a joke.
Tesla produces most of the worlds batteries:
https://www.mining.com/muskmobiles-running-rivals-off-the-ro...
In their own factories, which automaker has this level of integration?
Tesla has the best battery longevity metrics according to thousands of tested cars: https://electrek.co/2018/04/14/tesla-battery-degradation-dat...
Tesla is the only company with vast\robust charging network: https://hbr.org/2021/01/how-teslas-charging-stations-left-ot...
Tesla is the only company seriously investing in their own battery facilities. boots on the ground, working facilities.
Now tell me how Tesla is just like any other player in the EV space again?
Moving 2 cars together takes almost double the power. The aerodynamic drag can decrease slightly — work on semi trucks in close convoy formation suggests maybe 10-20%.
It’s common knowledge that you can do this.
This doesn't work out. The extra drain on the towing car more than makes up for the regen that the towed car gets.
Charge it... from where? There isn't a free energy source here...