The Historical Falsification of Columbus’ ‘Crimes’(spectator.org) |
The Historical Falsification of Columbus’ ‘Crimes’(spectator.org) |
> There is not one single historical source in existence that substantiates any of the “crimes.” Not one. None!
Hm, others disagree:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartolom%C3%A9_de_las_Casas
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/aug/07/books.spain
This might be a _politicised_ piece.
* John Durham and the Amazing Disappearing DNC Hack (subtitle: Evidence grows that the alleged Russian hacking of the DNC server in 2016 was an inside job.)
* They Hate You So Much (subtitle: There’s just no hiding the fact that the Democrats loathe America. They proved it Monday.)
* Language Victim (subtitle: If English gets the job done, why knock yourself out?)
* The Taiwan Enigma (subtitle: The Chinese Politburo sees Taiwan as a renegade province.)
Wikipedia cautiously describes it as "conservative"[0].
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Spectator
EDIT: Fixed the Wikipedia link, The American Spectator is not the US Spectator, which is also conservative.
EDIT2: I find it funny that multiple people would take time out of their day to downvote this comment that's just pointing out the clear and obvious political bias of the paper that's confirmed by Wikipedia and reflected in their headlines and focus of reporting. It's an American paper that's comfortable running a lead article literally stating that the Democratic party "loathes America". This is almost caricature level politics.
Ah right! I was wondering how the Spectator (UK) had fallen so low. That explains it.