Marak adds infinite loop test to popular colors.js

Marak adds infinite loop test to popular colors.js(github.com)

20 points by alexcroox 4 years ago | 7 comments

mofle 4 years ago |

If anyone is looking for a well-maintained coloring package, check out Chalk (https://github.com/chalk/chalk)

I'm one of the maintainers (https://github.com/sindresorhus).

jwalton 4 years ago |

I guess it’s time to remove all of Marak’s packages from my dependency trees. I’m worried his next one will be a post install script that does ‘rm -rf /‘ or something.

kapv89 4 years ago |

I think he might be having some mental health issues ... probably a breakdown of sorts

alexcroox 4 years ago |

This comes days after he nukes the faker.js library https://github.com/Marak/faker.js

borplk 4 years ago |

More context?

bellyfullofbac 4 years ago | |

Looks like a developer having an epic temper tantrum: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29839786

If I can throw my second impression, what a little shit. But maybe I'm too much of corporate conformist...

jka 4 years ago | | |

I hope most engineers would be able to empathise with Marak. He's built some very useful and now very popular software, and has made it open source, which perhaps we can debate the merits of, but that I would strongly suggest is a public good (and can have personal career benefits).

What he's running up against is an all-too-apparent piece-does-not-fit-problem between the business model and goals of revenue-focused tech companies and the individual motivations of (some?) open source engineers to improve the world in ways that they feel are effective.

It's understandable that if you're building something and see a for-profit company building exactly the same thing -- but with perceived worse negative externalities than your own -- that you'd be a bit frustrated.

If that competitor really wants to capture the market (ignoring externalities) it's plausible that they'd compete with him and try to pull the market across to their own services. Competition can be stressful, especially depending on how well the players behave towards each other.

I have little doubt that it's legal advice (or a sense of legal advice) that is the reason why he didn't receive a response to his offer to collaborate (perhaps a hope that they would take some of the weight off his shoulders; not totally unreasonable for someone who is maintaining important software that many people rely on).

He's been involved in some peculiar stories in the past but for the sake of debate here I'd suggest trying to ignore that. I don't think this will be a unique story; it's the open source sustainability problem[1] and I'm not sure we have consensus on clear, effective solutions yet (perhaps there will need to be a mix of options available depending on individual personalities).

[1] - https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/10/untangling_open_sourc...