It's about time, but it does raise the question of why so many of the largest organizations in the world were so eager to hitch their reputation to a shady outfit like BLM.

If it's just a matter of virtue signaling, or even better - actually doing something, it seems like the only organization that got it right was the NHL with their Hockey Diversity Alliance. They didn't fold to the pressure of aligning themselves with BLM who has been known to be a grift for many years. So how did everyone else get it so wrong?

And so what is the political bias of The Washington Examiner?

Do we have any less biased sources on this subject?