IRS provides docs: https://www.irs.gov/e-file-providers/tax-year-2021-modernize...
but hides them from the public.
And they try to trick you at every step to "upgrade" to the paid version...
The outside was NOT DEDUCTIBLE.
The inner, smaller ring was DEDUCTIBLE.
The bullseye was DEDUCTIBLE UNTIL AUDIT.
So when will Intuit be returning all of the bait-and-switch money?
Ask HN: How does TurboTax get away with dark patterns? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30409523 - Feb 2022 (122 comments)
Filing Taxes Could Be Free and Simple. But H&R Block and Intuit Lobby Against It (2017) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30185484 - Feb 2022 (18 comments)
Killing TurboTax - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26330584 - March 2021 (662 comments)
Show HN: ustaxes.org – open-source tax filing webapp - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26138446 - Feb 2021 (219 comments)
TurboTax Tricked You into Paying to File Your Taxes (2019) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26102695 - Feb 2021 (306 comments)
TurboTax’s 20-Year Fight to Stop Americans from Filing Taxes for Free (2019) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26060414 - Feb 2021 (199 comments)
FTC Is Investigating Intuit over TurboTax Practices - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24409093 - Sept 2020 (194 comments)
IRS Reforms Free File Program, Drops Agreement Not to Compete with TurboTax - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21923220 - Dec 2019 (448 comments)
IRS Tried to Hide Emails That Show Tax Industry Influence over Free File Program - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21393758 - Oct 2019 (188 comments)
TurboTax’s 20-Year Fight to Stop Americans from Filing Taxes for Free - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21281411 - Oct 2019 (447 comments)
TurboTax to charge more lower-income customers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20461169 - July 2019 (81 comments)
Congress Scraps Provision to Restrict IRS from Competing with TurboTax - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20119916 - June 2019 (18 comments)
TurboTax Uses a “Military Discount” to Trick Troops into Paying to File Taxes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19994118 - May 2019 (42 comments)
Listen to TurboTax Lie to Get Out of Refunding Overcharged Customers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19870242 - May 2019 (44 comments)
TurboTax and H&R Block Saw Free Tax Filing as a Threat - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19810981 - May 2019 (143 comments)
TurboTax Hides Its Free File Page from Search Engines - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19758126 - April 2019 (262 comments)
TurboTax Uses Dark Patterns to Trick You into Paying to File Your Taxes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19718284 - April 2019 (274 comments)
Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19613725 - April 2019 (696 comments)
How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing (2013) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19392673 - March 2019 (253 comments)
H&R Block and Intuit Lobby Against Free and Simple Tax Filing (2017) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18956883 - Jan 2019 (190 comments)
Would You Let the I.R.S. Prepare Your Taxes? (2015) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17751383 - Aug 2018 (424 comments)
Why I'm boycotting TurboTax this year - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16844458 - April 2018 (23 comments)
H&R Block and Intuit Lobbying Against Simpler Tax Filing (2017) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16841449 - April 2018 (232 comments)
H&R Block and Intuit Are Lobbying Against Making Tax Filling Free and Easy - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13922482 - March 2017 (234 comments)
How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing (2013) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13853150 - March 2017 (439 comments)
TurboTax Takes Aim at Smaller Rival in Fight for Filers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11150694 - Feb 2016 (87 comments)
Would You Let the I.R.S. Prepare Your Taxes? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9381437 - April 2015 (150 comments)
Would You Let the I.R.S. Prepare Your Taxes? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9380232 - April 2015 (124 comments)
Filing taxes: It shouldn't be so hard - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5488084 - April 2013 (56 comments)
How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5443203 - March 2013 (330 comments)
I like paying taxes to the State because that money goes to military and entitlements, and keeping the lights on. I do not agree with every military action, or every entitlement, but it's not my place to decide what direction the country goes in, it is my place to push.
I wonder how many orphanages Intuit runs, how much welfare they pay, where the bases they operate are, how many men they've put on the moon, to have the gall to demand taxes. That is an literally an act of sedition, literally a racket.
It's nuts. Intuit isn't worth that much.
The fact that our government has made such a process for fulfilling a legal obligation speaks volumes about the mafia-like nature of our federal government.
I pay lots of property tax where I live. But its just a bill. I can and sometimes do dispute the amount owed. But imagine if each year instead of that process I had to hire an independent team to determine what I owe, make a case for that, then submit that to my local tax authority. That's basically what the IRS does with individuals.
If you're an eg. independent contractor, you have to fill out a full report (income, expenses, income tax already prepaid, benefits paid, etc.), but you also do it on a governments website and sign it using a digital certificate (that is free for citizens).
No 3rd party software, no paying anything (unless you have an accountant do that for you, but it's relatively simple to do it by yourself), and the most time-consuming task is calculating all the yearly earnings and expenses.
Not in a free society. An ineffective government is a conspicuous drain.
If they precalculated your taxes and sent you a bill (or refund) it would (a) be easier, (b) be more accurate and (c) encourage simplification of the entire system. I consider that both more effective and more fair.
That's why despite my bookkeepers protests, we moved to another accounting service and when they bought MailChimp I pulled my whole company out of that too.
I understand workplace is not always a place for activism, but I could switch with reasonable effort and it made me feel good not to fund this sort of behavior.
Biggest downside is no import from brokerage, so if you trade a lot it could be annoying to create your schedule D.
There is an institutional (mainly Republican) commitment to strangling the IRS here in the US. Filing taxes should be free and easy.
Or, ideally, not needed at all. In the UK having an average financial situation like a job (one that doesn’t pay megabucks, anyway), a pension, a tax-efficient savings account and a student doesn’t require any filing at all. Everything happens through payroll. If you do earn a lot or have other things that trigger the need to file it’s free and not overly onerous — certainly within the grasp of a mere mortal.
(And before someone chimes in with “how do you know the government gets the figures right?!”: because the tax code, or at least the parts that face most people, is straightforward and most people have a bog-standard default configuration that is easy to verify.)
What my local IRS did is sensible default. Employment income are submitted electronically to my IRS from most employers. Deductions and reliefs are automatically factored in if it relates to other government services (e.g. reliefs for child).
What I love most is for information that they don't have information on, such as deductible expenses for rental income, they suggest a default of 15% expenses where we don't have to provide any proof or documentation. It is a 15% deduction over the rental income that's just given to you. Of course, we can challenge it if we feel we should have higher deductions, providing them with the necessary documents.
Here in the UK, the tax year runs from April to April. Your employer reports exactly your taxable earnings to the government every month. You can log in online and see exactly what you're taxed on. You do not need to fill out a self-assessment at all - it's all done automatically, except for under certain circumstances which don't affect most of the population, but roughly:
* You have earnings over £1000 a year from outside of your normal employment (e.g. from interest on savings, selling things on eBay, whatever). * You are earning above £50,000 per year but want to continue claiming child benefit (which phases out between £50,000 and £60,000, so some needs to be repaid). * You earn over £100,000.
First Intuit lobbies to prevent free tax returns by claiming that can provide their own (very sketchy) free service for that. Then they have the gall to opt out that very program which they used to prevent free tax returns in the first place.
I wish they would just go away.
It's not hard to collect income data automatically. Here in Singapore (as in many other countries) I get a message reminding me to check my tax data before the filing date. I just login and click "Submit". If I forget to do this, I may miss some deductions, but it goes through anyway.
Tax filing can be made simple enough that a layperson can do it without employing an accountant.
Dang - it might be nice to include this in the "Related" comment pinned to the top, it's just the "level up in the filesystem" above the courtlistener link you already have in it.
In the way there is a revolving door with the SEC, is there a revolving door at the FTC?
> Public Citizen found that just over 75 percent of top FTC officials (31 out of 41) over the past two decades have either left the agency to serve corporate interests confronting FTC issues, joined the agency after serving corporate interests on these issues, or both.
https://www.citizen.org/article/ftc-big-tech-revolving-door-...
Are they reminding BigTech that hey, they have political power and some palms needs to be greased.
If there's something you can't figure out, is risky, or a one-off, hire someone to do your taxes.
Then use that as a template for subsequent years to do it yourself.
Also, use the federal free fillable forms to e-file. They might be available for your state, as well.
But as long as Intuit isn't making any money, I'm fine with whatever.
1 https://twitter.com/frantzfries/status/1505942638704345094?s...
Intuit: OK.
Intuits exec to its employees: Make this free system, but hide it from the public. Provide links that are broken, make sure it doesn't show up on search indexes.
Scott Cook and all those involved should have all of their assets seized. About as slimy as you can get as a person. Made billions off of scamming United States citizens.
Lobbyists have way too much power.
Here’s Milton Friedman on the reason the tax code is intentionally complicated: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TruCIPy79w8
I wrote to both of the representatives in my state, let's see what I hear back.
Turbotax is the dominant player in an industry created by the government. Tax prep fees are just another tax.
They get my income, loans for future capital gain deductions, have calculated in the basic deductions and so on.
I wanted some extra deductions this year, so I simply went and inserted those on their own web site with simple boxes to fill. Even before the tax season. No problems...
It is great when the tax agency isn't actually adversarial, but instead ready to help and even work with you if you are having troubles.
https://www.cnbc.com/select/what-to-do-with-late-tax-return-...
> A long-standing law requires the IRS to pay interest to those who received their tax refunds late — notably 45 days after the typical filing date of April 15. Just as taxpayers must pay interest on any outstanding obligations they owe to the IRS, the rule works both ways if the IRS is late on the money they owe back.
They pay 3% interest currently, which is pretty nice.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.39...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/03/turbotax-maker-s... (via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30846884, but we've merged the threads)
Ok, so if they can do all that automatically for an "electronic audit" why am I filing a return, just run that thing and send it to me and I can file an exception if there is something on it I disagree with.
I think the answer has already been identified in several other comments here, a heavy lobby effort on the part of Intuit, H&R and whoever else to keep it tricky and complex so you have to buy their B.S> software or services.
Me: How much do I owe?
Gov’t: You have to figure that out.
Me: I just pay what I want?
Gov’t: Oh, no we know exactly how much you owe. But you have to guess that number too.
Me: What if I get it wrong?
Gov’t: You go to prison
Source: https://twitter.com/jordan_stratton/status/11181414550616719...
I dig this one up every April.
What they don't know is your income from sources like rental income or crypto. They also don't know deductions you are going to claim. In this case you will have to provide the details. Still free to lodge your returns online.
It’d be nice if my 1099s were electronically filed with the cost basis. But they’re not. So the IRS, every year, thinks I’m going to owe way more than I do.
The IRS also has zero idea about the $4000+ of sales tax deductions I’m filing for this year.
And finally, if you do get it wrong, you don’t go to jail. They send you a CP2000 letter. (Remember those 1099s? I forgot one one year.) You fix the problem or show them their error. They’ll even waive the penalties the first time. It’s a somewhat easy process.
it's also super easy to setup a payment plan online now if you really mess things up
Just send me a statement, you made this, you get this much deduction for the other crap or whatever.
No stupid W2, W4 1040, bunch of mumbo jumbo from the 1950's that a few companies are ripping us off over IMO.
Gov’t: You owe us money. We took the amount we want directly from your income.
Me: But shouldn't the amount be lower because of X and Y and Z ?
Gov’t: Send us all the right paperwork and we might give you back some of what we took if we agree with your claim.
I actually like this version better (and it's also what I am used to), but I'd see people being uncomfortable with that arrangement.
> Almost all participants said that they would opt to use the service the following year.
And yes, as you have said, the answer is lobbying.
> Tax preparation services strongly opposed ReadyReturn and have lobbied against its expansion.
[1] https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-was-exper....
EDIT: I can't find the podcast I heard this in, but pretty sure the tax professor that spearheaded this pilot got followed by people hired by Intuit.
Priceonomics wrote an accompanying article: https://priceonomics.com/the-stanford-professor-who-fought-t...
This feels somehow like it should be illegal to willfully and knowingly make the common good worse in favor of your company. Perhaps via antitrust.
The only thing I need to manually add is the EUR value of crypto assets on Jan 1st of the preceding year (good luck figuring that one out, the exchanges are kinda shit), and any charity donations I may have done. (my dad will pettily write down any speeding ticket cost as charity donations)
But don't worry, the project started in 2009 to replace their COBOL mainframe systems is kinda, sorta on track for completion...in 2030.
- they fill out their taxes with rough estimates,
- the IRS helpfully corrects their errors, and sends the form back
- they sign the corrected form, send it back
- the IRS accepts the second round.
This is basically the same "pre-filled" workflow as every other developed country. The difference is that we have a first round where you put in a semi-plausible effort to placate the tax preparation lobby.
Has anyone with a normal job (not self-employed, regular paycheck from a company registered with the IRS) ever been fined etc for this?
Even if they can't tell me what numbers they expect when I file, it seems like they could at least let me know within a few weeks if they're pretty sure I missed a 1099. Heck, I typically file at least a month early. They could let me know before April 15 and I could have just fixed it! Ugh.
They could send me a monthly statement like my city government does. Instead, they wait a year to let me know I slipped up and then charge me interest. Guys, if you know I slipped up now you could have told me a year ago.
There was an interesting Planet Money episode about this [0].
Why? They think I sold a house and kept all of the gains. Like I didn't have a mortgage, and like it wasn't my primary residence.
It's ridiculous. I can't explain how stressed out getting a $165k bill when that's practically my yearly income made me. I wonder how many wealthy people get these completely incorrect $165k bills and how often they come after the person with $10k in the bank.
State governments are not necessarily believing the same set of facts that the federal government does. I got caught in a multi-year cycle one time where the state government kept coming after me every year for the same thing, even though I had the federal return and the evidence that it was correct.
Each year I'd send that thing in, in response, and I'd never hear from them...until the next year, when they'd do it again.
Felt to me like each year somebody would receive my response, decide it was too much work to deal with, and then file it away in the "hit them again next year" pile.
I assumed they did that automatically for everyone -- does that mean that if I "forget" to attach a 1099 then they IRS won't know unless they do this special "electronic audit"?
Every year I get a reminder, log into an app with my government ID, click "next" a few times while checking the numbers and submit. It literally takes 2 minutes if you don't have anything to adjust.
does the US have a thing like DigiD?
Gods no, can you imagine the US having a national, universal, secure digital ID?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/dreading-taxes-countries-s...
Be sure you have a copy, either scanned or electronic, of all documents on your computer. Ditto all tax return filled in forms. Use the fill-in pdf’s the IRS provides.
Do not miss a filing date. File a tax return missing important documentation if necessary, but file. Similarly, pay the tax you owe, or estimate you owe on time. The penalties for late filing and owed taxes are severe. You will not make a serious error if you work from the income transcript.
And I've filed taxes in countries with simple tax codes where the government pre-fills out the forms. Guess what? You still need to go and double check everything because the information comes from your employer. I've found mistakes before. So I pretty much "do my taxes" myself to make sure what the govt sends isn't wrong.
The gain is that we can make "doing your taxes" a non-issue for most Americans. Sure some people will still need accountants for complicated situations but in one swoop we can eliminate hundreds of millions of hours of useless work every year for basically no downside -- it's pure gravy.
That's how it worked for me in France when I was an employee. As a freelancer there is a bit more work, but nothing like the puzzle that tax declaration seems to be in the US.
This is how it works in Australia. Taxes are filed online with the government authority (ATO), and everything is pre-filled. You just need verify it's correct and make any claims you want.
The feds have no idea how your deductions (and to a lesser extent, your income) have changed from the previous year. They don't have a full picture of your finances, but you do. In the abstract, with those constraints, the system of "tell us everything we need to know, pay us, and you get in trouble if you lie so egregiously that you get caught" works pretty well.
Note that there's a whole lot of countries that send you a prepared tax return that you adjust if necessary, and most people don't need to. There's no fundamental reason we couldn't do this here.
Indeed, California even did it for a couple years: https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-was-exper...
Yeah, it doesn't work for everyone. So they could offer it to you, and you have the choice to click "ok", or to click "add additional income and deduction". If your situation is so crazy that neither of those options work, you can then do it the classic/hard mode way with an accountant.
It's how it works in plenty of countries. The US is a bit unique with one of the more complex tax code in the world, but it would still work fine for a large portion of the population.
Currently, many Federal tax forms are supported, as well as tax filing for the state of Illinois. Filing for Oregon and California is under development!
Fuck these companies.
It might be different in the US, but in Canada I file my taxes using the CRA's data directly. TurboTax even fetches it directly from their website. What's the point? They have my T4, my T2202 (studies) and everything else. Just send me a letter telling me how much money I owe/I am owed and that's it.
…but man, this was a particularly egregious example I came across this year.
You can pay for TurboTax using your refund…with an additional $39 processing fee. That is just wild.
(I might be a bit off on the price, but not enough to change the result. TurboTax's loss if the debtor here "defaults" somehow is … what, even?)
I mean, ideally the buttons would be immediately below the corresponding content.
But if both buttons are going to be at the bottom, I can see arguments for either order.
I know this is where we’re supposed to decry the system of which this is symptomatic, and talk about campaign finance and such. And all that stuff is true, sure. But Intuit has been such a consistently abusive actor that they’re normalizing regulatory capture, with enormous financial, time, stress, and legal repercussions for the entire population.
Seriously, fuck them.
Our household has just the basic salaries / expenses / 401k / IRAs. THe year I received some temporary additional benefits, Intuit decided that I had to pay premium in order to enter that single additional 1099.
I left, found a much simpler, straightforward service with which I filed legitimately free, and have never looked back.
Plus, I've read about Intuit's history with the whole market, and I will never willingly give them a damn cent.
They have your previous filings so switching to another provider can be a pain since you need to know last year income when submitting your filing. I always make sure to at least download the PDF's.
As a consumer we're always free to vote with our wallet and I've been happy with freetaxusa so far but I'm also waiting for the "rate hike" to come...
"File your taxes free! Oh, you have to file an HSA contribution? Sorry, you'll have to buy H&R Block DELUXE ($79.99) to do that!"
Kinda feels like blackmail, really. If I don't file my HSA contribution I'm technically committing fraud, right?
But the companies know exactly how much to charge you so you avoid the hassle; though I won't shell out for state e-filing when I can print and mail.
The IRS will send you a corrected tax return, you sign it and mail them a check and you'll hear nothing from them again. Maybe you didn't get the form, or didn't understand the software, etc, etc. There are lots of honest ways to screw up your taxes. The IRS isn't going to assume fraud unless you refuse to pay them when they point it out.
I've screwed up my taxes a lot of times. Not maliciously, but not having all of my forms, I've had clients report paying me a different amount than they told the IRS, forgot stock trades I made, etc. Every time, they've sent a letter asking to pay a balance, plus maybe a small fee, and all is good.
As long as the job of Congress is to kiss the ass of every powerful industry lobby, we won’t have good things.
It isn't perfect since its a young project, but I've attempted to simplify and modularize the process of creating/maintaining forms to allow for that part to be crowd-sourced as much as possible (and I'd love your help!).
More discussion over here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30846884
Every piece of news in which Intuit gets slapped is good news to me. I just hope legislators start doing their jobs at some point and spare the taxpayer of this bullshit.
Most of my income is from W2 and some 1099 here and there. As others mentioned, America is backwards and the politicians and 1% keep fleecing it towards Romes fate.
I love seeing those on the top get fleeced for a change, unfortunately this will just be a slap on the wrist.
[0] https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/04/03/709656642/epis...
Really? There are some TurboTax ads where every word spoken is the word 'free.' ;)
1. https://www.tvcommercialad.com/watch/XosLKPV
So there wouldn’t be this problem with Intuit if the government got their shit together. Why not spend efforts to improve the system rather than litigation? The answer? Lobbying.
This is all in stark contrast to the system which exists in Denmark, where I live, where taxes are all filed online and the government automatically fetches most information so that you mostly only need to review it and add deductions.
[1] https://medium.com/@syastrov/us-tax-system-a-fractal-of-bad-...
Someday our descendants will have sane and automatic filing like the rest of the developed world; I can only hope to live long enough to see the death of this stupid industry.
Edit: I looks like they don't :(
Items Not Supported
Foreign employment income (Form 2555)
https://www.freetaxusa.com/supported_forms.jspbasically how it works in Sweden
People should definitively understand how much taxes they are paying so that they demand some accountability for their money.
How do you accomplish that?
How does the project plan to keep up with that? Will it require volunteers?
Right now, we're focusing on tooling to make onboarding new tax forms simpler and require a lower threshold of project understanding to allow a larger, less technical group of people to contribute
Last year I used http://opentaxsolver.sourceforge.net/
It did the job, mostly, but had some quirks and didn't quite get everything right with the rounding when I set it to use whole dollar amounts, so I had to correct a few totals that ended up being $1 off, which was annoying. Probably won't use that one again.
But the freefilefillableforms supported by IRS rounds all input and then does addition based on that. For now we just maintain all cents and do math with the precise numbers, then round at the end when the numbers need to go into the forms. We have some work in the pipeline now to make that user-configurable too.
I'd like to contribute, but don't feel like building someone's business for free.
Can any free app do all of this?
Better yet is there a free app that can log into my Turbotax account, fetch all the data and then generate the forms and file them?
Not only is it cheaper, more importantly, you’re not giving money that’s going towards maintaining the tax code that prevents the government from “competing” with TurboTax.
Obviously the Government already has what it needs to pretty much do all of your taxes, and they already must do this anyway. They could ask you like 5 short questions and your taxes would be done…they already have all your info.
Stop paying the lobbyists to continue lobbying against your interests. Start getting in the habit of calling or emailing your reps around tax time.
I'm not mad about owing the money, but what annoys me is if they have enough information to know that I underreported, then why am I part of this equation to begin with? Clearly they have enough of my tax data to know I screwed up, so why don't they just send me a bill once a year? I don't see why Intuit (or HR Block or TaxAct or Jackson Hewitt etc) need to be part of this transaction at all.
[1] It was an honest mistake on my end, I forgot to report a sizeable stock sale I did in 2020.
I stopped using them last year because it was just too much. I can easily see how someone could end up with a multi-hundred dollar bill from them. Many of the popups are tailored to look like you need to say yes.
I personally use it because my taxes are too complicated to do it myself on paper.
I hope they are correct, I honestly do a good faith job but it's too complicated.... the pdf download for 2020 was 426 pages... that includes state. and it will be even more next this year about to file my 21.
way too complicated I only own a small s-corp (technically 2) and do some really small level investing with active trading.
The sad part: she didn't think anything of it, and thought that's how it was. The reason for the screenshot is because last year, her daughter's dad basically stole her child tax credit. So she was celebrating getting her return accepted before he could pull the same thing.
For reference, her return was also five figures. I'm guessing these companies aim for a % of the total return. So perhaps a "$149" upgrade was $249 because of her return size. Like how online retailers bump up the price for goods based on zip code. I'm speculating though.
Keep in mind that every service worker is terrified of an audit. The cost is much higher when you don’t have resources.
EDIT: I think I didn't phrase this very well. My point was that the average service worker is trained to be terrified of the IRS. These people are already usually paying hefty fines because they missed their returns in prior years. That's why they take the path of least resistance, and just pay someone else as a shield against this.
So it's not particularly surprising that TurboTax has swindled this person out of $600 with their upsells. Nor should she be condemned as a fool. If you were in her shoes, you might do the same thing.
Being audited isn't much of a concern if your only source of income is a typical W2 job. The average service worker isn't throwing money around in stocks, crypto, blackjack, and corporate entities.
The vast majority of the people who qualify for free tax filing have nothing to audit. The government makes enough money off their deductions, not to mention what they generate having to spend >50% of their income to stay afloat, to overlook a few unreported tips or sneaker sales.
Like with your health system, a lot of us are slightly baffled by how broken things are in the US.
https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-turbotax-20-year-f...
Citizen's United was a group that made a political-advocacy movie and the FEC wanted to treat it as regulated political activity.
Is it really necessary to "encourage" me to dislike taxes? Is not the money leaving my pocket sufficient?
I've also heard Republicans claiming that IRS-provided tax bills/refunds is equivalent to a tax. I guess the implication is that the government is going to intentionally charge you more.
Having to use TurboTax or someting like it is equivalent to a tax, but it's paid to a corporation instead of the government. If I had to choose between my money going to the government and Intuit, I'd choose the government.
Pretty sure it's just run-of-the-mill lobbying and corruption unfortunately. A typical "think of the jobs!" type of thing.
What annoys me now is that if you want a paper booklet you have to request one in advance if you did not use one previously but otherwise there is no free to everyone option to do it. You either request a paper booklet or use 3rd party software.
If you have some amounts you want to regain from losses, etc., you can still do your taxes manually.
That means logging into the free MEX IRS platform, which shows all your tax info preffilled. Most likely the stuff you want to input is already there (all invoices in mexico are signed by private/public keys through the IRS system).
So you just enter your bank account to get your money back. Or get your reference to pay your taxes.
The system is really beautiful.
I'm not a fan of Trump, but the Trump tax changes made it so it doesn't make sense for me to do itemized deductions, because I won't beat the standard deduction unless I have a lot more things to deduct than I normally do, which greatly simplifies my tax filing and record keeping. Since I know I won't be deducting donations, I don't need a receipt when donating them, and that saves paperwork.
Wouldn't it be the opposite? Having a complicated tax system makes it harder to find out how much you're paying. If things were simpler it would be much more apparent.
I never have to think about calculating or filing tax, but I always see it and know exactly how much it is.
The argument I've heard is that so righteous indignation over the "staggeringly high" taxes "stolen from the hardworking American people" or whatever. This is one of the same arguments as to why sales taxes shouldn't be included in the shelf price of an item or service.
Except it doesn't work. People can be mad about taxes regardless of whether they're easy or hard to file. (Paying taxes is straightforward; the vast majority of us have it done for us from our paychecks every interval.) And where I live, public votes to raise the sales tax for various projects, often public transit, rarely if ever fail.
It seems to me just to be an excuse to not actually deal with our busted as hell tax collection system because that system benefits people who themselves have an excuse to rile people up about taxes.
> Except it doesn't work. People can be mad about taxes regardless of whether they're easy or hard to file.
"that can't possibly be a fair representation of that ideologue's position, there's huge gaps in the logic!"
look, positions way out on the fringes don't have to make coherent sense to the rest of us. PETA runs kill-shelters that euthanize millions of animals every year, sometimes multiples of other kill shelters. It makes sense to them, they have their own logic why that's good.
Making Americans hate every aspect of taxes - the amount, having to spend a couple quality hours with a tax program every year, getting sales tax rolled on top of advertised prices, everything - is the goal here. Just make taxes suck so that people hate them. Because then people will oppose taxation.
I think this would provide the transparency that conservatives want, along with the simplicity that liberals want. My only concern is that the data would be fudged, like the social security “statements” are.
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-maker-of-turbotax...
I'm ready to go back to doing my taxes by hand and mailing them in. (I'm old enough to remember doing that - it is faster than doing it on the computer except for the one year I forgot to copy line 13 of form 1234A to line 56b of form 9876B) So many dark patters where the software is pretending to take time doing a complex calculation that takes a computer a couple nanoseconds, not to mention all the time to skip over things that don't apply to me.
TurboTax tried to double count my Benevity sales anyways and I had to catch it when it messed up the 1040. Why am I paying for software? If I get to the point I can't handle it myself anymore I'll just start paying an accountant.
Just to back this up with facts - here are the braille and spanish language offerings which took all of two seconds of googling:
https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/irs-tax-forms-in-braille-and-...
https://apps.irs.gov/app/picklist/list/formsPublications.htm...
Here's a page describing forms and situations it does not handle [1].
One thing that might annoy some people is that to login to the Cash App Taxes website you must use their mobile app. The website shows a QR code which you scan from the mobile app.
It uses the approach of asking you various questions in order to figure out what forms it thinks you need to file, which is an approach that some people do not like.
If there is a form you know you have to do that it missed or you have a 1099-something that it has not asked you to enter it took me a little while to figure out how to deal with that. What you do is type the name of the form into the help search box. One of the results will be a link to take you directly to the page that deals with that form.
[1] https://taxeshelp.cash.app/s/article/Forms-and-situations-Ca...
So this year, I prepared my taxes with FreeTaxUSA instead. So far I love it. It required me to manually input a lot of information that was auto-imported on TT and CK, which isn't as terrible as I thought. Overall I'm finding the UX to be very clean and clear. I haven't had to Google answers to vague questions or unique situations like I had to with the others. It even caught an error that I'm having to fix with my bank, and told me exactly how to fix it. I'm very impressed with FreeTaxUSA so far. Hopefully they never sell out.
I'd double check by filing with another software just to make sure (i.e https://www.freetaxusa.com/)
You say this like it's just a thing that people can do. But the people you're telling to "Just do this" have already been trained to be terrified of the IRS. Many of them are currently paying huge fines due to missing their returns in prior years. Any small mistake can hang you when you're impoverished, precisely because you don't have any room for error.
"Most Americans" is an umbrella that contains mostly service workers. The people that serve you food, bag your groceries, drive your amazon purchases, and so on. If you've spent a lot of time with people like this, I encourage you to ask them "Hey, do you pay someone to do your taxes, or do you do it yourself? Why?"
I'm pretty sure the conversation will go "I pay. I just don't want to worry about it." And that "worry" is because they've been hit hard in the wallet, because the (American) government is not friendly when it comes to messing up your taxes.
If I am mistaken about this, I would like to know. But this is true of my extended family, and I'm pretty sure it's true for most of their friends.
The irony is that -- as you said -- the IRS hits people of modest income harder, because the IRS doesn't have the resources to take on many battles with wealthy people who can afford lawyers. This means the IRS mostly goes after easy targets who won't fight back. Yet another tax on being poor.
Why do you say that? I've never encountered people who were terrified nor have I read about it. How many people are paying "huge fines"? AFAIK, the IRS's audit capacity is greatly underfunded.
So it's not totally arbitrary, but I certainly agree that the US tax system is messed up.
Follow the lobby money.
I'm not sure if anyone knows the true amount, but estimates put the number spent on lobbying around a few million dollars. Opensecrets.org estimated ~$3.2m lobbying in 2021.
https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary...
For a company that makes $2 BILLION dollars a year, the amount they actually spend lobbying and otherwise influencing governments is shockingly small.
Here's an old article from 2013 on it, for example, and a letter from Grover Norquist (sponsor of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge) and others.
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-maker-of-turbotax...
https://www.atr.org/taxpayer-advocates-issue-joint-free-file...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Taxpa...
However, those options aren't advertised and these companies like to do "Free" but then upgrade you as you fill out options.
The problem truly is advertising, like you said. The government just cannot out-advertise companies that are doing $9 billion in revenue.
They just don't want to because someone bribed them to not do so.
But few people actually do because it is a painful experience. The IRS' documentation isn't actually bad, it is just that the tax system itself is incredibly (and needlessly) complicated.
For example, you'd need to hand-enter every stock trade (even automated re-investments) even though your broker likely already electronically sent this information to the IRS. Using a digital solution they can often log into your broker and auto-import everything.
For how under-budget the IRS is and how bad the tax system is, they do ok, but the whole thing needs a massive overhaul but there is money in politics keeping it bad in order to profit private companies (plus there's a certain demographic that "hating taxes" is a political position that needs to be kept up with, essentially self-reinforcing-itself).
The answer is "because Congress passed a law saying they can't".
This is not true for most folks, who can use one of two exceptions that allow summarizing. Exception 1 allows you to simply report totals on Schedule D. Exception 2 has you file Form 8949 with summarized rows, as long as you attach a statement with the detailed transaction info (the brokerage 1099-B generally suffices).
https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8949#en_US_2021_publink100...
These are the very same exceptions that tax software uses.
The end result is that I hand-enter anyway, even when paying $120 to Intuit for the privilege.
If you have deductions, stock sales, a nanny, a business, etc then you need the regular 1040 and various schedules, and those are all complex enough that you'd probably benefit from software. It's not absolutely required, but there are enough ways to do it wrong (like adding up the wrong lines) that the peace of mind alone is probably worth it to you.
Credit Karma has an option to do taxes that is completely free, but I tried it once a few years ago and didn't care for it.
I use FreeTaxUSA which offers free federal and $7 state taxes. Cheaper than a meal at Taco Bell.
Do them yourself. The IRS has guidance and resources for those who are interested [1].
[1] https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-f...
So yeah, we're in a place where the IRS says taxpayers "should file electronically with direct deposit if at all possible" [2] but also informs taxpayers that not everyone can use the IRS's forms to file electronically.
0: https://www.irs.gov/e-file-providers/free-file-fillable-form...
1: https://www.irs.gov/e-file-providers/free-file-fillable-form...
2: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-begins-2022-tax-season-urge...
Currently, many Federal tax forms are supported, as well as tax filing for the state of Illinois. Filing for Oregon and California is under development!
Sure, it's a bit tedious. But short of a privacy-preserving libre solution or just doing them manually with fillable PDFs, you'd have to do most of that isolation prepwork anyway. So fuck 'em.
P.S. The directions for modifying .NET assemblies to crack TurboTax are simple and easily followed by anyone with basic programming skill. So if you're fine trusting Intuit you could obtain the installation files from them directly, crack it yourself, and even have e-filing capability from what I understand.
I'm sure this will be a nightmare for the next few years. As if selling that house wasn't a bad enough experience.
I shouldn't have to spend $5k or whatever else on a lawyer to deal with this. Insane. I walked away with $13k after paying everyone/mortgage off.
This is pretty much the only reason I own stamps.
If they are charging some absurd (say 20%) interest and you're off by 10k, you might pay them a few hundred in interest if the process is prolonged a month, which is on par with a tax prep service.
Them: It says here you spent $X on healthcare expenses.
Me: I've got 4 kids. I always hit my deductible.
Them, literally laughing: Yeah, kids are expensive. OK, moving on...
What they can't do for you is know about deductions sometimes.
What I would really like is to somehow extract out a representation of the tax logic into something separate from the business of collecting the data from the user, or even calculating the results. I'm not entirely sure what that would look like, maybe it would have to be some domain-specific language (eww) in order to be able to fully express the relationships and dependencies between different fields/forms.
But I think that tax logic portion is the difficult-to-maintain part, and also the portion different projects would benefit the most from sharing.
Which service is that? I haven't filed my taxes this year and am willing to spend some time switching to an app that's less scummy than Intuit's offerings.
Well, corporations are people, people have the right to bear arms, and the country was founded on the idea that if you really really don't like your government, violence is an appropriate response to change it. Of course the Constitution pulled the ladder up behind the founding fathers on that bit of political philosophy, but in recent years I've heard some rhetoric citing the Declaration as inspiration for the path they should take now. Corporate personhood adds an interesting twist to things, especially considering that Alphabet or Apple could secede and have a larger GDP than many countries. Alphabet might quickly get labelled a hostile foreign power for all their spying. Apple might start a trade war with their extortionate tariffs but we'd still probably have reasonable diplomatic relations with them.
Maybe 200+ years with only one major civil war is a good record under these conditions, and maybe the next one will have official corporate sponsors.
See e.g. http://reason.org/files/ba148cd5babdda39f9ebb43b336b01d4.pdf
Abolishing income tax because it is hard to file is quite absurd. You can have a flat percentage income tax and then you wouldn't have to file. Then you could implement an automatic deduction via tax credits ala Milton's negative income tax. For me that would be an acceptable compromise if my goal was simplifying taxes.
a) that you have an outstanding tax bill, or other garnishment, and while you overpaid, you will not be receiving a refund, and they'll need to find you to make payment some other way.
b) the return is fraudulent and they're going to have to pick up the pieces when the IRS figures it out and reverses the deposit. Plus, they didn't get paid.
Is that $40 of risk? Eh, probably not, but it's something.
There is a formula in the law that specifies how much if your salary gets deducted every month based on specific criteria such as your marital status, your religion (yeah church taxes), whether it is your primary or secondary job etc.
That amount is calculated to be enough (a little bit to much in fact) to cover taxes for most people employed with a single job.
Unless you have extra income or deductions beyond a certain amount you don't have to file any tax return.
If you want to file one (pre filled with what they know) the government calculates what you need to pay/are owed and you have the right to dispute that.
You can use the free digitalised version of the former paper form or you can use a number of (often inexpensive) commercial programs
I like it, my city government sends me a statement once a month, says you owe this amount for police, that amount for fire, some other amount for sewer and water, some amount for schools. Maybe I disagree with some of the amounts, fair to discuss, that's democracy. But they don't play that idiotic game the feds do, you owe a certain amount, if you guess it correctly, or if you on purpose short it but we don't catch you at it, then nothing happens. But if we randomly catch you getting it wrong then we fuck with you. I hate that.
https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-f...
This is the system I am looking for. I think it would make the lives of the IRS employees better and would save me time and money.
IME everything else stays the same (e.g. the 8000s forms), but there are so many of them that it's a lot of work to just see which ones have changed and if you have to care about them. The forms also become less formulaic. E.g. If you file 6251, you need to keep your own records about Alternative basis, so you can't just fill them out based on w2s and 1099s.
Sounds like yet another thing the e-filing lobby worked to ensure their monopoly...
Out of curiosity, was the tax preparer actually a licensed CPA, or just someone with no professional credentials? If they were a CPA, did they prepare individual tax returns regularly or only as a side job?
Worse, virtually all of the 1098-T guidance exists for undergrads. The problems with the form are entirely different for graduate students and basically nobody can help.
> Out of curiosity, was the tax preparer actually a licensed CPA, or just someone with no professional credentials? If they were a CPA, did they prepare individual tax returns regularly or only as a side job?
It's been a bunch of years so I don't know for certain, but they weren't just a desk worker at H&R Block. Tax preparation was their primary job.
CPA can also be useful beyond just tax filing. My CPA does a half year evaluation to see if I'd owe any additional tax and plan accordingly. They also makes sure I get all the deductions I can.
I did these taxes in the height of the pandemic in March after being laid off and living out of airbnbs for 3 months so it very well may have just been missed unfortunately. I'm not even sure what they need or who to talk to, I'm just going to mail them everything I have including the Statute stating I don't need to pay capital gains on a primary residence house sale under $500k.
They probably don't need a copy of the Statute, but eh. :)
What a weight off my back..
It's entirely possible for the rights holders to say "we're going private now" and pivot the project into a for-profit business.
In terms of future proofing against the project "going commercial" (i.e. changing the license going forward), it doesn't get much better than this, because pretty much all the copyright holders would need to agree on a license change.
Ideally, the bulk of the copyright does not reside with a small number of authors - the more authors, and the more evenly the copyright is spread among them, the better.
It's interesting because having a group of disparate humans come together and say "yea, we hate the current thing, let's build something better and not commercialize it" doesn't typically happen. Kudos to you folks!
If you have questions and the README and CONTRIBUTING documents do not specify a way to communicate, then open Issues on GitHub with your questions. Try to avoid asking questions unless you’ve read everything and cannot figure out how to proceed: remember that everyone working on the project is volunteering their limited time, just like you, and try to be respectful of their time and energy.
I am unaffiliated with this project, this is just the general procedure for contributing to open source projects.
Is it okay with you if a corporation donates money to Roger Moore to support the production of a documentary that said corporation agrees with?
Does it depend on whether said documentary advocates for/against a candidate?
How do we define "advocate"? (Is saying "Fred took money from Mexican drug lords" advocacy?)
If it sounds unbelievable, I don't blame you at all. I wouldn't have believed it myself until seeing just how Kafkaesque "dealing with the government" can be. Especially when penalties are involved.
For the rest of my family, it's a little awkward to find out. It's mostly on my wife's side; my father was always very fastidious about taxes, as most families of most HN readers probably are. I only wanted to point out that there's a large number of people where this isn't true.
I'll try to dig up direct answers for you. Thankfully most of this pain has been not-mine for many years now.
I think in reality, a way to get the “civilized country” (as referred to by another poster) tax experience is just file an incomplete return, the IRS will bill you the correct amount along with a negligible “fee” (interest) a few weeks or months later.
Maybe doing this repeatedly would upset the IRS, I don’t know. But it definitely works a few times without issue.
That said, I wouldn’t do this on purpose :)
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/fin/supp_info/revenue/...
When taxes are used as a means of control, that’s totalitarian. Tax policy should always be neutral.
1. give everyone who does X US$300
2. give everyone who does X a US$300 tax credit
Both rely on the collection and disbursement of government revenue, which is typically accomplished via taxation.However, 1. does not introduce any new clauses to the tax code. 2., by contrast does, and it generally functions as a slow steady drip, drip, drip of new clauses.
We therefore end up with an extremely complex tax code, instead of a simple tax code, and legislative acts to pay people for doing things we choose (via political process) that we want done.
It's too easy to make a company go bankrupt with LLC, so taxes are the only way. Unless you have a better idea? (I once had a libertarian explain to me the owners/investors should be liable for externalities, and in this case, taxes shouldn't control for it. I couldn't really disagree, but even staunch communists understand the issue with that).
- George Washington, probably
(I agree with the rest of your comment. While I disagree with the parent's perspective, I think the FTC's here is that Intuit's advertising leads people towards their not-free products, instead of the actually free stuff that does exist. I don't think most people have the self-confidence to do the 1040 by hand.)
I, personally, have no idea what the government's "communications" have been regarding taxes outside of news articles.
Either way, though, this is no competition for a year's worth of massive advertising campaigns.
However, they do have an estimate and the vast majority of people would accept this estimate. So I think it's reasonable to suggest it ought to be provided.
I think the strongest counter-argument against this approach is in regards to bad actors and who discloses first. If you're thinking about hiding income and the first step is the government telling you what it thinks then you're very likely to continue to conceal and/or have a defense against a charge of concealment down the road ("I just used the IRS figures!")
It's a much more difficult situation for a bad actor if they have to disclose first without knowing for sure what the IRS knows.
They know some of your income, but not all of it. Your 1099 income for the year is getting filed by your clients at the same time you're filing it, so all they know is what your AGI was last year. They know your expenses from last year in terms of the numbers, but they haven't been checked (last I saw, they were 3-5 years behind on cross-checking and validation depending on type of return). So they could plug the number in, sort of.
So they have your reported info from previous years, and a best guess at some of what this year's information might be.
I agree, this won't work for a big class of people. It won't work for me. But it will work for the majority of tax filers who don't have a 1099 and who don't file a schedule A, B, C, D ...
My tax return last year was a half inch thick, printed out. I had to file on paper. I very much understand that this doesn't work for everyone. But it works for most people.
That last bit? That's important - you get to check them. You can adjust if you should need to. Guess what most folks don't have to do? Check them. This works because most folks have simple returns. They work, might or might not own a house, might have a bank account, might have a retirement account - and that's about it. The government already has what it needs for most people. But you can check them and adjust if they are wrong. Of course, you can just not bother, too.
Is the system perfect? No, but it doesn't need to be. It merely needs to have better overall tax compliance than another system. When taxes are easy for the vast majority of your population, the governement has a better collection rate and can spend manpower auditing those that need audited (perhaps audit more complicated returns from the well-to-do instead of Ordinary Married Citizen that makes 50k jointly) and they can generally spend less money doing things like printing forms and manning question lines that don't give answers that constitute legal advice.
And seriously, in these systems, hiding income is still a crime. So those folks that just "used the IRS figures!" still have the chance of going to jail. Even if they never get caught, the automated system still wins because of the other benefits.
And the vast majority of people would then overpay. The IRS knows income, but they don’t know expenses.
Almost everyone would be best served by IRS calculated taxes. It's the wealthy and those with non-wage income who need the alphabet schedules.
Just quickly looking at CashApp Tax, it appears it is an Android app that likely will want network access to function. If that meets your requirements, good for you. But it doesn't meet mine. I'd also rather use the same software year to year so that information is carried forward, rather than being subject to whichever way the startup winds blow.
Furthermore — it’s your tax records. As soon as the government receives them they enter the permanent records of surveillance valley.
> As soon as the government receives them they enter the permanent records of surveillance valley.
Uh no, US tax records are not public data, nor available for the surveillance industry to buy AFAIK. It's unavoidable that the government gets them, but the fewer parties that get mine the better.
And thanks to Citizens United and similar decisions that have driven up the cost of US elections, US pols are very expensive compared to their counterparts in other countries.
It does make me wonder about the efficacy of standing up a lobbying fund to lobby to Do The Right Thing about something. This would be a prime example - I would happily pay $100 to compete with Intuit's lobbying here. I'm also certain there are 31,999 other people in the US who feel the same way.
I just don't have the energy to do the work of learning how to set up the corporate structure around that to make it legal.
It's through season tickets to the network of friends that know the politician, it's through donations to the university that gets their child into college, it's through pacs and issue groups, it's through lining up and bundling donors to max out their individual donations to a politician's preferred presidential candidate, it's through flying them out to special events, it's through hiring their best friend, it's through investing in their brother in law's new business, it's through buying things at their husband or wife's charity auction, it's through arranging a job for them after they retire from politics, it's through finding them a buyer for their investment property, it's through an entire network of investments one or two degrees removed from the politician.
The only sliver of that that people typically cite is the amount directly spent on campaign contributions which (1) mistakenly makes it seem like politicians are cheap and (2) is underwhelming, to people who cite those numbers sincerely believing that that's the only economic dimension to political influence.
Congratulations, you just independently invented the concept of a Political Action Committee.
Obnoxiously, this year TurboTax's integration with Binance is broken. I haven't checked in a few weeks but it won't accept Binance CSV's either. This needs to be fixed soon.
The only real fix is actual accountability for lawmakers. It means massive amounts of oversight to catch those who accept bribes in any forms (including "campaign contributions") and it means making it simple for the people to vote out anyone who refuses to represent their interests.
Right now, bribery is effectively legal, there is zero accountability and between the two party system, gerrymandering, and voter suppression even if you manage to get someone out of office you're probably not going to like the person you're forced to vote in to replace them. We're a very long way from fixing the problem and all of the people in power have zero incentive to start getting us there because they profit off the system being broken.
Honestly though, actually reaching out to your representatives and talking to them is far more effective than most people assume.
[0] https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/09/18/too-much-dark-money-in...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast
For this plan to work, people have to really hate paying taxes. So, despite the fact that Norquist and his allies often talk about things like "reducing the burden on the taypayer", they have in fact acted to make paying taxes as unpleasant an experience as possible. This means deliberately underfunding the IRS and ensuring filing taxes is slow, complicated, and expensive.
He is also the architect of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, which is endorsed by the vast majority of Republican politicians currently in office. The pledge prohibits them from supporting any legislation that would increase taxes on people or corporations. The idea of "starving the beast" has been endorsed in as many words by a number of politicians, including George W. Bush.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Taxpa...
Any time a Republican politician starts talking about reducing the deficit, know that they are lying. Over 95% of them have publicly signed a pledge meant to deliberately increase the deficit. This isn't a conspiracy theory. The plans are public.
Sources would be nice.
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-maker-of-turbotax...
His stated reasons are so fantastically stupid that I can't imagine them being legitimate. Return-free filing is the best tool we have to achieve his claimed goals of reducing the complexity and confusion of tax season. Can you think of an innocent explanation for his opposition?
Reminds me of Grafton where the population didn't care about cutting government services and only cared about lower taxes. Liberals all over the country moved there and it ended with bear attacks because everyone was disposing their trash incorrectly and the only policeman in town had a broken down car.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21534416/free-state-...
The problem with this approach is all it does is it legitimises pollution/destruction/captation if you just pay a tax on it.
Not even a penalty for wrongdoing. Pay a tax and you’re fine.
My CPA is great, and I save money through using his services.
It's possible that I'm just reacting to a biased sample of people. But my impression was that this is a common mindset for a nontrivial subset of the population. Being afraid of doing something wrong on your government forms isn't really an irrational fear. Anyone who's owned a car in Chicago will tell you that the city's goal is to extract as many thousands of dollars from you as possible – it was still one of my worst financial decisions of all time. And that wasn't even taxes.
The broader point is that "dealing with the government" is a big messy bucket that people usually want to pay a janitorial service to dispose of. Even things like "being reminded to file your taxes right now" is valuable in that situation. Most people don't have a clue what day they need to file by. They don't learn it in school, and their parents either don't know or didn't bother to teach them.
That does not at all match my experience, it's widely discussed every year, and I wonder how many returns are late.
But you left out income. The idea here is that HN users tend to be a biased sample. Most of us aren't impoverished.
I would bet that your family's discussions are due to the fact that you have a stable, fully functional family. Most people outside of tech aren't as fortunate.
If I'm mistaken about this, and your family isn't middle class or higher, then that's an important data point though.
Every single wall or desk calendar I've ever seen has "Tax Day" labeled on it.
Of course most people have no idea how much VAT they pay for Amazon purchases in a year, but that's mostly a product of them not knowing how much they spend on Amazon in a year. If they know the latter, the former is trivial to figure out.
Due to complexity, all larger stores with multiple geographic locations would never have separate pricing signage for every single store, so they don't. Other stores do the same. It's all calculated at the register as things are scanned in the computer.
Which is a long way of saying that even if you knew the total you spent at Amazon, you wouldn't be able to derive the total amount of sales tax paid.
FWIW, usually in the US it's just a line item on the receipt or checkout screen.
That is wild. I remember using it for my first job, and yep, it took me all of a few hours to fill it out by hand and mail it in.
It may be weird for you when you visit, but, as we all grew up with it, it's just normal here.
After that, its just whether or not the incumbent can defend against the opposition party in the general election. Primaries are generally where the biggest changes are made, and are also where its the hardest to oust the incumbent.
Its not cynical, nor an excuse.
Collectively, people have a lot more money than corporations do - the trouble is organization. But basically flooding the system with so much money that corporate bribery becomes insignificant is the other option to banning it
(Tangentially, Feingold was one of the smartest people in the Senate. Wisconsin voted him out in favor of Johnson, one of the stupidest people in the Senate — the only thing that keeps him from the top spot is just the fuckload of really dumb other Republican senators.)
This is a lot of people now, thanks to the gig economy. Similarly, farmers plus people who work for tips (at employers that do not centralize tips).
Because why would anyone do that. But legally speaking, yes, you have to.
Maybe there should be a tax rebate for smokers, so they can buy more cigarettes?
And “sin taxes”, i.e. tobbaco taxes and carbon taxes are a logical fallacy.
Tobacco tax won’t offset the additional healthcare costs for smokers on average, so it ends up just being a penalty for having a bad habit, and carbon tax will simply put a price tag on high carbon emissions.
For what it's worth -- and it's possible I'm living in a bubble, but -- the only family member I know that watches the news is my dad. Everyone else quietly switched to netflix long ago. The news mostly comes from the drama of the day; things that show up on facebook. (The recent Chris Rock drama, and other nonsense like that.)
I recently followed CBS on TikTok though, to my surprise. They had some of the best coverage of the Ukraine war I've seen. I even joked to my wife that the circle of life was complete: not only have I never watched the news in years, and not only does my dad have no clue what tiktok is, but now I'm watching the news on tiktok.
Thanks for pointing out that the news is sometimes a valuable thing to keep on one's radar.
I grew up impoverished. Impoverished people talk about tax filing time way, way more than well off people because they need the money (refund) much more. A very pleasant memory of my early childhood was at my aunt's house celebrating her tax refund with her by making strombolis.
The U.S is unique in forcing its citizens to waste countless hours and pay hundreds/thousands of dollars every year doing the useless unnecessary work of "filing taxes". Why is the system still this backwards? Either plain ignorance of there being a superior alternative, or a broken political system that can't get anything done. My guess is it's a combination of both.
I’m a South African citizen, I get an SMS that a pre-filled-in tax return is available online.
I can then log in to their online portal and accept it or amend it and submit it electronically.
Currently I can usually just accept and submit it.
Some years I might need to add or tweak income and expenses, but broadly speaking they are pretty correct.
They have all the income and benefit details from standard corporate employers, expense and contribution info from medical aids (something like medical insurance, but a bit more sane as far as I can tell), investment and banking contributions from financial service providers, etc.
You can opt for extra deductions which require extra paperwork from your side. And they don’t always have income info from side hustles or correct expense info from “unusual” arrangements between you and your spouse. Sometimes your $BIGCORP’s finance department can declare your benefits incorrectly which needs fixing.
But for most middle-class income earners I suspect they can just log in and click accept.
You can pay money and use a tax consultant to see if they can navigate the current rules for a better result, but unless you have a complicated setup you don’t need to.
Intuit lobbying hard to keep tax rules complex.
(copy and pasted from another comment)
If you are not getting a VAT refund then you are paying VAT and it is in your interest that everyone does, so most consumers would select the box. The transfer is recorded, consumers would be complicit in the fraud if they didn't tick the box and that's enough excuse for both sides to want to play ball.
cries in German
If you do end up filing your taxes, you can access the prefilled tax statements. Software to do that is free and easy. If you want software advising you on how to get a bigger refund, you'll have to pay maybe $10-20, though the $5 software from Aldi works fine for me.
It may be unusual, but it's certainly not unique; I have to fill in a tax-return every year, because I receive rental income. Anyone in the UK that receives income that isn't taxed at source by their employer has to complete one.
The last one I completed was 21 pages long, with notes for each page; a lot of the time I spent was scrabbling through my filing cabinet searching for my evidence.
That rental income plus my state pension and bank interest are the only taxable income I receive.
At one time I was a company director, and had to fill in personal tax returns. I folded the company, and returned to salaried employment, taxed at source; it took me a decade to get the tax authorities to stop sending me tax return forms that I was required by law to complete.
The first £1,000 is tax free (presumably the cost of admin makes it easier to let that go).
And up to £2,500 you just have to phone / email HMRC.
Of course, TurboTax/Intuit also lobbies to keep taxes more difficult to protect their profits.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/0...
Until or unless everything is centralized and cash ceases to exist, I don't know how they'd really do it. In South Korea do waiters live on tips? Because in the US, almost all money made in the restaurant service industry comes from unrecorded cash tips; the actual wages are extremely low. The restaurant will attempt to estimate their workers tips and cover the taxes out of the fixed wages, but... this doesn't even get into all the other cash industries like stripping or moonlighting as a dominatrix. The US's tax attitude seems to be: You're on your honor, and most of the time we won't catch you, but not even Jesus can help if we do.
I should be a pretty typical middle-class example. Two salaries (me + spouse), a mortgage, limited other deductions. Yet every year I have to wait for various forms that the government already has, enter the values on paper or pay for tax software, hope I don’t fat finger a value, and wait 7-10 years for an audit. Heck, since Trump increased the standard deduction, I’ll probably be taking that soon (mortgage interest is near that threshold now), but still can’t just click a button at irs.gov that says “yup, that’s right, here’s my bank info for refund/payment”
Neither. There is awareness of the alternatives, and the political system can get things done for it's real constituents. The problem is a malevolent political system that primarily serves a class whose interests are opposed to the mass of the citizenry, to wit, a narrow capitalist elite.
(People will point to the tax prep industry, it's lobbying, etc., and that is part of the problem; an bigger part, however, is the political faction favoring lower taxes in general for the elites that likes to maximize the perceived pain of taxes for the masses to generate support for elite-favoring tax cuts; they are adamantly opposed to procedural simplification that minimizes the pain they leverage.)
At the beginning of the year, you get a bill for that year based on what they think you will owe. This bill is due on October 31, i.e. you need to pay your estimated income tax before you have earned all that income. This is especially strange because most people will get a 13th month salary at the end of October (your annual salary is split into 13 months, the extra comes in time for Christms presents?). You are expected to save adequately to be able by the end of October.
Banking secrecy is not dead in Switzerland. There are no longer anonymous accounts, and banks share information with foreign governments. However, there is banking secrecy between the banks and the government. On the other hand, we pay a wealth tax each year (it's small), so you need to declare each account and how much you had in it on December 31.
To create an equal playing field between house owners and renters, house owners pay an imputed rent cost for how much they would have paid in rent for their house. This is added to their income before taxes are calculated. In my case, this means my assessed income is around 25k higher than it otherwise would be.
There is no automatic form filling in my state, but there is free tax software (Java app which runs everywhere), and it is pretty easy to use. If you have questions, the local tax office will nicely respond via "secure email" in 1-2 days.
Taxes are very progressive and family friendly. With 4 kids and one income we pay 6.5% combined local/state/federal on income of around 120k (plus imputed rent).
There are no property taxes. For the wealth tax, most people who own houses never pay off their mortgages. They will typically have a mortgage for 50% of the house value (which can be quite high, a typical house where I live is between 800k and 1000k, and more in bigger cities). The interest can be deducted, and the mortgage amount from the wealth tax.
wait, I thought this only applied to US citizens, not Green Card holders
That's ~20 years before Sweden got everything prefilled for some of the population. As an example.
German taxes are really horrible, in general. They expect you to pay in advance for expected untaxed income (based on the previous year's return). Working out the taxes on the income from some ETF is a nightmare, unless your platform does it for you. Unless you really understand the system and can file your own taxes, then low-wage freelance work just doesn't make sense as the cost of doing the taxes can be higher than your income. This means people are trapped into not working.
You can negotiate to have your advances reduced but the government really doesn't like it when businesses (including freelancers and solo entrepreneurs) have a high difference between their advances and the actual taxes. This also goes for declaring your VAT (which depending on how much you make you'll have to do monthly or quarterly as an advance and then alongside your income tax) and while in that case you basically set the advance yourself you'll get in trouble if it doesn't match your actual VAT (difference between charged and paid).
You can file your own taxes and if you're a regular employee there are tons of non-commercial orgs you can go to that will assist you in doing that but if you're a "business" (even if it's just you and you haven't incorporated) they'll often not help you.
BTW the reason you can just forego filing your own taxes as an employee if you just want to be taxed on your wages (and don't have anything else to declare, e.g. interest on savings) is that your employer already had to do the taxes on your wages and benefits for you. So it's not like the government just does them themselves, it's just done by payroll instead of you.
Now, with the 300 Euros of fuel relief, every employee will have to file taxes on said 300 Euros.
Hearing about how taxes work in other countries makes me grateful for the system we have here.
Most people never have to file a return. The people that do have a more complicated arrangement and probably need to summarise expenses, etc.
The allowances are more so ordinary people taking in a lodger don't get caught up in tax requirements.
You could probably choose to pay yourself a PAYE salary from a limited company and not need to complete a personal tax return.
If you are legally able to claim deductions, pre-filled tax forms that do not contain those deductions are by definition wrong, even though you may agree with individual form items. While this can be related to innocent mistakes and the sheer inability of the state to know the necessary information, sometimes it appears to be deliberate: The classic example is the Pendlerpauschale, which does not appear in Elster pre-filled tax forms even though the state does have all necessary information (address of your flat / address of your employer) to fill it.
If you accept these faulty forms, you will almost always pay more taxes than you have to.
For example: RSUs and NQSOs (employee stock grants) are in my experience handled extremely poorly by default. If I have RSUs vest when the stock is worth $10 a share, then I pay income tax that year based on income of ($10 x share-count). If I sell those shares later on, my brokerage reports to the IRS either: unknown basis value or $0 basis value. The correct basis value is $10 per share. There's a spot in the tax forms where you can tell the IRS that you have the corrected basis, but if you don't do this, you will pay extra tax, and it's an easy one to miss, especially if you're just importing the 1099-B.
At tax time my brokerage does send me additional forms beyond the 1099-B that include the corrected basis values, so its not that they don't know the right value, they just don't give it to the IRS directly. I assume this is due to IRS/congress rules and not my brokerage being obnoxious.
Sure, and I'd be ok with giving people the option to deny the default return and file their own using Intuit or something. For people like me, who don't have the ambition to try and do anything clever with taxes, I'd be ok with the default return that they generate from all the information sent via my employer and banks.
Then people in that situation can do it from scratch like they're already required to do now. This is really not an issue anywhere else - this change wouldn't make the process harder for anyone.
The overwhelming majority of people do not have complicated taxes. That is the exception and as others have pointed out, they could hire an accountant just like they do today.
Having the IRS mail out your bill would eliminate the need for most people to purchase accounting software each year, which is exactly what Intuit doesn't want.
> A broker or barter exchange must file Form 1099-B for each person: > For whom the broker has sold (including short sales) stocks, ... etc., for cash
https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1099b
To elaborate on the GP comment, the issue is not whether the brokerage reports, but how they do it. You generally compute capital gain income as (sale price) - (acquisition price). If you buy a stock on the market and sell it, brokers generally report both sale price and acquisition price to you and the IRS.
But for employee stock compensation, the broker can report sale price without acquisition price to the IRS. If you don't report the acquisition price yourself, the IRS will think that it's 0, and assume your income is much higher than the real value.
General penalty relief: https://www.irs.gov/payments/penalty-relief
I just went through this for an honest mistake as well, though I didn't qualify for a first time abatement. It took months to get a response as well.
I believe your best chance is dialing in right when they open, before the call queues build up. Also the folks answering the calls are in a better mood then, and you're more likely to get the outcome you're looking for.
By comparison, the needless busywork that the IRS puts the tax payers through is nothing short of ridiculous really. It only serves to waste time and effort, and there is plain and simple no reason whatsoever why the IRS could not do it like Norwegian tax authorities does. Our system here in Norway is not perfect either, but the citizens of the United States, and the US government, would benefit hugely from a tax filing system built to help you file taxes the way that ours does for us.
The busywork comes mostly from the arcane and convoluted nature of US tax code, notably the parts that describe deductions and credits. US governments use such things as a way to implement policy, and the crap just piles up over time. Can you deduct X? How much of X can you deduct? Are you eligible for a credit? Or just part of a credit? Or none of it? etc. etc.
There's some chance that they didn't have enough information to know that until you filed. Maybe.
Because Capitalism, in essence, is the optimization of one particular group’s ability to alter how people live their lives in a way that transfers the most wealth from the working class.
America’s economy is a house of cards built around financial middlemen.
I have looked, and I am still waiting.
Americans would probably still decry it as socialism or communism even though it is very far away from those.
But the US is unique in the developed world as making filing taxes hell even if you don’t try to minmax them, and that is primarily due to tax filing companies lobbying against the IRS doing what everybody else does (and secondarily due to the GOP very much wanting filing taxes to be as painful and error prone as possible, and for it to be as expensive as possible for the IRS).
But the US tax code is an order of magnitude larger than the Swedish one. Which probably means that it is several orders of magnitude more complex (however that might be defined).
If you want a narrow target, you can blame the GOP activists on the US Supreme Court, or if you want to go beyond that, blame the GOP senators/presidents who appointed them, the Federalist Society, the GOP donor base, GOP-aligned media organizations, etc.
Gutting campaign finance restrictions was a vast judicial overreach, performed for partisan advantage and the benefit of corrupt wealthy patrons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Oppos...
It’s undoubtedly true that some US politicians have gotten bribes, defrauded partners or constituents, embezzled money from their campaigns or the government, used inside information to trade stocks, etc. But even if all of those were impossible, the nature of the US campaign finance system would create plenty of perverse incentives.
Sure, but it's not like they don't have a choice. Regardless of any incentives, they're the only ones actually empowered to make these decisions. Lobbying, offers of bribes, campaign financing promises, etc. do not in any sense detract from their ability and responsibility to make the right choices.
You can’t un-screw a system by just telling the people inside who were selected for their mendacity and corruption to “make the right choices”.
The IRS could generate online forms (or snail mail) with what they know and let us add deductions and other income. They should know salary/wages, they could know investment income (not sure if broker report to the IRS, or just send forms to filers).
Even if the filer has to manually enter deductions, credits, etc, doing it on an IRS site has several benefits... no $50+ fee for H&R/TaxCut/etc, no $500+ for a CPA (for fairly typical tax situations), no worrying about whether online submission processed correctly (because you'd be submitting directly to the IRS instead of relying on a 3rd party to submit for you). Multiply that time/money/stress savings across the population and it's a MASSIVE benefit to society.
Fuel and food, no tax.
School supplies, shoes, clothing, any item under $100, no tax. Over $100, ramp it up.
Diamond rings, 100% tax.
Alcohol and cigarettes, 20-30%.
Used cars, no tax.
New cars, 10% up to 100%. Credits if they're electric or extremely fuel-efficient.
Playstations, high end sneakers, Smart TVs, iPhones, rims, jewelry, expensive furnishings, rugs, anything better than your basic washer/drier: 100% tax.
Books: Free and subsidized by the government, as many as you want, any book ever written.
Healthcare: Free.
College: Free.
Basically under my plan, as long as you get stuff you need for your family, you pay no tax. If you get stuff you want for your pleasure, you pay tax on it.
How's that regressive?
The only real downside I see is the potential for a massive black market in luxury goods, tobacco and alcohol. But legalizing and taxing pot and prostitution should take some of the sting out of that.
Of course not, but it's still the politicians (on both sides of the aisle) who are ultimately at fault for abusing their position and failing in their duty to their constituents, not the lobbyists for merely making suggestions or offering deals in their own self-interest. Restricting lobbying or campaign contributions wouldn't do anything to improve existing politicians' "mendacity and corruption". They'll just find other, less public, ways to serve themselves rather than their constituents.
In a democracy, it is the voters who are ultimately at fault.
But perhaps more to the point, it is the system that is at fault, and the system is very complex: institutions, physical infrastructure, social mores, common beliefs, canonical media and stories, traditions, language, ....
You can’t just point fingers at individual people in a large imperfect system and pretend that swapping them would fix it. Troubleshooting and improving large complex systems is really hard and improvements are usually incremental, except sometimes in extraordinary crises.
I consider myself pretty high income. If I was just taxed on consumption, I would bet I'd pay probably half as much tax as I do now.
Low earners drive some shit cars, while you and me can (probably) afford a brand new Audi. How is that fair? /s
>>Which you and I could easily afford.
That's the key part here. You tax those who can afford it the most.