Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration(onlinelibrary.wiley.com) |
Pfizer's primary mRNA injections “temporarily” impair semen concentration(onlinelibrary.wiley.com) |
Scare quoting temporarily plats into a particular irrational belief that COVID vaccination (maybe all vaccination) renders American men sterile.
Could that have maybe been a reason for posting it?
Thus, the editorialized scare quotes seem to be misplaced.
The op did the same thing here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30306904
At least that's my read on the use of the "scare quotes".
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pfizer-vaccine-effects-on...
People also forget that Guillain-Barre syndrome is more common after ordinary infections than vaccinations.
However, this is a thing that none of the many people who previously got this shot would have been offically warned about beforehand, right?
This is presumably one of the reasons why a lot of people were skeptical that giving something to a billion people and then waiting a few months was perfectly sufficient to make claims about long term safety.
[1] > it _does_ say that the effect goes away
The issue is that when being advised (or browbeaten) to get this shot, you probably weren't informed beforehand that for the next 3 months your swimmers might not be in tip top shape. This might not matter to you or me, but maybe it would to couples that are trying to concieve, for instance.
Does that make sense?
This particular post is just to promote suspicion about science and COVID vaccine.
The title shown here is unfortunately editorialized, but the actual paper's title is "Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors".
I attempted to submit the link with its actual title, but unfortunately it just sent me to this thread. Aside from the title, this submission doesn't seem flagworthy to me.