There are failures in every walk of life, yet no one in the art world can accept that a work of art can be a failure. I think this mentality is partly responsible for the general decline in the public perception of modern art.

I've seen enough, I don't need to see anymore to tell you it's bad.

No, not exactly, it’s an opinion. If the art is in essence a critique on “what is a city”, critiques of the installation itself as “what is art” is equally fair game.

> Would you know how to judge such a piece of art in general?

How is this a fair question? Would Heizer know how to judge a city?