Even if you have evidence/knowledge of explicitly expressed intention to do you retaliatory or other maliciously-motivated harm, the only procedure provided for redress, rebuttal, review request submission requires you to pre-acknowledge your purported belief that "it was all a big mistake no doubt."

Am I misreading?

_____

Counter-Notice. If you believe that your User Content that was removed (or to which access was disabled) is not infringing, or that you have the authorization from the copyright owner, the copyright owner’s agent, or pursuant to the law, to upload and use the content in your User Content, you may send a written counter-notice containing the following information to the Copyright Agent:

your physical or electronic signature; identification of the content that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and the location at which the content appeared before it was removed or disabled; a statement that *you have a good faith belief that the content was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or a misidentification* of the content; and your name, address, telephone number, and email address, a statement that you consent to