How did they perform this research when having been exposed to polygraph evasion techniques can basically make you ineligible for a clearance?

I forgot to ask that in the set of interviews where the woman who no longer works for RAND and didn't immediately transfer to Switzerland told me autistic people can't work for RAND.

I felt like telling her "Weren't you at Defcon? I already talked to CERT, if you're gonna drop all pretense, the last time I got this offended I went down to Atterbgery and rented a glock .40, and opened a safe deposit box to keep my hard drives in.", but yet again I let someone being WAY ruder than I would have let a guy be in the spirit of feminism or whatever.

Be mindful that this is untested, and unusuable in a court of law. I worry some people invent ever elaborate ways of detecting deception, but break down when you speak simply.

(Ex: "I don't want a security clearance, stop selectively connecting me with roles based on my passport, or I'll get a different one.")

Putting all that aside, cool work -- there's a lot of junk psychometrics reesearch.

I should know -- I used to read it all to make my trolls more effective. Artisinal, locally sourced shitposts, written on the fly.

(I got flagged the other day, if this kind of thing isn't allowed you can remove the post, the best discourse happens on your way out when you don't give a damn if they ban you.)

- Greg