RIM CEOs to Give Up Top Posts in Shuffle (online.wsj.com) |
RIM CEOs to Give Up Top Posts in Shuffle (online.wsj.com) |
"...new chief executive officer says the company is doing
everything right and does not need a change in
strategy..."
oh boy![1] http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/at-researc...
http://press.rim.com/release.jsp?id=5358
and more info:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/jim-balsillie...
a) hire from the outside for a fresh perspective
or
b) get acquired
Their phones are a lost cause. Even if they had an amazing phone in the pipeline, I don't think they could stop their slide if it was released tomorrow.
At this point, BES and their patents are the things with any value.
Rumors are that they're shopping the company around but asking too much.
HP would be the other company in my "management-impaired former titans" portfolio which might benefit from a change (they'll probably want to wait a bit, and Meg Whitman is definitely an improvement over some of their other CEOs.)
Lazaridis is becoming Vice Chair (whatever that means) and Balsillie is retaining his seat but will be stripped of all titles.
This company makes a lot of money, they still have a lot of marketshare, but there's no question they are in a serious downdraft. It would be completely normal for any company in this situation to put itself up for sale. I'm a little surprised Google choose to buy Motorola Mobility rather than RIM, given that RIM has a lower market value and has more attractive assets.
Regardless of what it says in the press I imagine finding a potential acquirer of the company will be the first task of the new CEO.
Speaking of living in a bubble...
So you would sell a profitable company with a large market share?
I agree that several years ago, when phone having an IP address was unheard of, BES made all the sense in the world. It's kind of pointless now.
RIM is very profitable and growing
Actually the opposite is true: RIM profit drops 27 percent; shipments seen down[1], The Waterloo, Ontario, company said fiscal third-quarter earnings tumbled 71% on a charge related to a disastrous launch of a tablet competitor to Apple's iPad. And it forecast weak smartphone shipments in the current quarter. [2], etc, etc
[1] http://news.yahoo.com/instant-view-rim-profit-drops-27-perce...
[2] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020402680457710...
Gruber referenced something about this not so long ago - someone had written an article showing that historically companies that do this appear good in the short term, but in the long term it is a huge danger sign.
Hence the person to whom you were replying may have been aware of the "profits are up" song RIM has been singing for a while now, but not aware of the most recent results which indicate a rude awakening is imminent.
We'll have to wait until tomorrow [1] to find out whether Android as a platform has a bigger marketshare than iOS does.
[1] http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/01/20FY-12-First-Quarte...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2011/11/04/apple-t...
In any case, I find this type of pedantry kind of annoying. I made a point about RIM losing marketshare, my point was not about what percentage of a certain market Apple owns.