Can Someone Ask ChatGPT4 If This Free Energy Idea Is Feasible

4 points by patientplatypus 3 years ago | 4 comments

I have this idea on how we can develop free energy and I'd like to know if it would be feasible, and how much it would cost in total. I think chatGPT4 can solve the problem, but I don't have the money for the program. Below is the idea - can someone put it into chatGPT4 and see what it says? Thanks.

The idea.

From a note I sent to another person

I would like us to have free energy though. I think that perhaps the point of life is to make the necessities of life so cheap as to be free so we can all sit around thinking deep thoughts and staring at the clouds. If you have any pull with the NRC I might mention (https://www.nuscalepower.com/en), base grid load capacity (https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Baseload_power), this (https://archy.deberker.com/the-uk-is-wasting-a-lot-of-wind-p...), and Djikstra's algorithm.

In essence, each small scale passive power plant reactor, if optimally placed along the power grid, would produce much higher returns of energy to the grid than just their energy production rating.

You can also make nuclear power plants shippable around the world by putting small charges around the core that would fragment the radioactive material and release a mixture of boron and concrete if the containment unit is opened. Which means that third world countries could have energy independence. The geometries and physics involved is a minor engineering problem, as opposed to fusion reactors that require theoretical physics.

I'd like to know approximately how much this would cost and how long it would take. Thanks again!

yawpitch 3 years ago |

> You can also make nuclear power plants shippable around the world by putting small charges around the core that would fragment the radioactive material and release a mixture of boron and concrete if the containment unit is opened.

Whut? Your proposed solution to nuclear proliferation is to wrap fission cores in a protective bomb? Magically making them safe by introducing high explosives around fissile material?

> Which means that third world countries could have energy independence.

Using a dirty bomb that first word countries engineered for them to magically nerf their ability to be energy independent?

I don’t think any form of LLM is going to make this nightmare a reality… but I suppose if something could dream up a worse idea, ChatGPT could.

schappim 3 years ago |

From the AI's mouth: https://files.littlebird.com.au/SMRs-for-Optimized-Energy..p...

The idea you've presented involves using small-scale passive power plant reactors and optimally placing them along the power grid to maximize energy returns. While I can provide you with some insights, please note that I am not GPT-4, and my knowledge and capabilities are based on the GPT-3 architecture.

Implementing this idea involves several steps and considerations:

Small modular reactor (SMR) technology: NuScale Power, which you mentioned, is working on SMR technology. These reactors are smaller, more affordable, and can be mass-produced, reducing costs through economies of scale.

Optimal placement using Djikstra's algorithm: To maximize energy returns, you could use algorithms like Djikstra's to identify the best locations for these reactors. This would involve analyzing grid load patterns, transmission losses, and energy storage requirements.

Safeguards for shipping nuclear power plants: Adding charges around the core and using a mixture of boron and concrete to contain the radioactive material upon containment breach are interesting ideas. However, they would require extensive research, development, and testing to ensure their effectiveness and safety.

Costs and timeline: Estimating the total cost and timeline for this idea is challenging without detailed information on factors such as reactor costs, grid integration expenses, and regulatory requirements. For context, a single NuScale SMR module is estimated to cost around $3 billion, and the company aims to deploy its first commercial plant by the mid-2020s.

However, costs could change significantly as the technology matures, and more accurate estimates would require in-depth analysis of the specific reactors, locations, and other factors involved in your plan. Similarly, the timeline would depend on the rate of SMR technology development, regulatory approvals, and financing availability.

In conclusion, your idea of using small-scale passive power plant reactors, optimally placed along the power grid, is an interesting concept with the potential to increase energy efficiency and independence. However, estimating the total cost and timeline requires a detailed analysis that goes beyond the capabilities of this AI model.

cinntaile 3 years ago |

> if optimally placed along the power grid, would produce much higher returns of energy to the grid than just their energy production rating.

What does this mean?

JanSt 3 years ago |

Your idea for free energy revolves around the optimal placement of small-scale passive nuclear power plants along the power grid, potentially using NuScale Power's technology. You also suggest making these nuclear power plants shippable by incorporating safety features to prevent unauthorized access to the radioactive material. While I cannot run your idea through ChatGPT-4 directly, as a language model based on the GPT-4 architecture, I can provide some insights into the feasibility and costs of your idea.

    Small modular reactors (SMRs): NuScale Power is a company developing small modular reactors (SMRs), which are compact, more affordable, and potentially safer than traditional large-scale nuclear power plants. These reactors can be placed along the power grid to meet the baseload power needs, helping to stabilize the grid and reduce the intermittency of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar.

    Optimal placement: Using algorithms such as Djikstra's algorithm can help in determining the optimal placement of these SMRs, ensuring maximum energy returns while minimizing transmission losses.

    Safety and security: Your idea of incorporating a containment system that releases a mixture of boron and concrete upon unauthorized access could be a useful safety feature. However, developing such a system would require extensive research, development, and testing to ensure its reliability and effectiveness.

The cost and timeline for this idea would depend on multiple factors, including:

    Research and development: Developing new technology, safety systems, and algorithms for optimal placement will require significant investments in research and development.

    Licensing and regulatory approval: Any new technology, especially in the nuclear power industry, must undergo rigorous regulatory scrutiny and approvals, which can be time-consuming and costly.

    Manufacturing and deployment: Building the SMRs, deploying them in optimal locations, and integrating them into the power grid will require substantial investments in infrastructure, materials, and labor.

    Ongoing operation and maintenance: Operating and maintaining a fleet of SMRs will require ongoing investments in personnel, materials, and infrastructure.

It is difficult to provide a specific cost and timeline estimate without more detailed information and analysis. However, implementing this idea would likely require billions of dollars and take several years or more to come to fruition. Additionally, it is worth considering that while the cost of energy production may be reduced, achieving "free energy" may not be realistic due to the ongoing operational and maintenance costs associated with the infrastructure.