I repeated the authors question with just a slightly modified prompt. Way better results achieved. It seems the author is just being fantastical and contrarian, because how can you be so oblivious to simple prompting? Maybe I'm mistaken. I definitely get the hallucination problem but the constant focus on the negative side effects without mentioning the positive benefits is a common refrain it seems.

> I am going to interview one of the most outspoken critics of AI, Meridith Whittaker. What should I ask Meredith Whittaker about AI.

ChatGPT 3.5:

As an outspoken critic of AI, Meridith Whittaker has expertise in various aspects of AI, including ethics, biases, social implications, and accountability. Here are some questions you could consider asking her:

1) What motivated you to become an AI critic, and what are your main concerns about the impact of AI on society?

2) What do you see as the most significant ethical issues related to AI, and how do you think society should address them?

3) How can we ensure that AI systems are designed and developed with transparency and accountability in mind, especially when it comes to making decisions that affect people's lives?

4) Some people argue that AI can help mitigate human biases. What is your view on this, and how can we ensure that AI systems are not perpetuating or even amplifying existing biases?

5) How do you see AI affecting the job market and the future of work, and what can be done to address potential job displacement and income inequality?

6) What is your opinion on the use of facial recognition technology and other surveillance technologies by governments and corporations, and how should we regulate their use?

7) Some people argue that AI can bring about significant benefits, such as improving healthcare and reducing energy consumption. How do you balance these potential benefits with the risks of AI?

8) Finally, what advice would you give to policymakers, technology companies, and society as a whole to ensure that AI is developed and deployed responsibly and ethically?