Public web unravels in AI-driven storm(axios.com) |
Public web unravels in AI-driven storm(axios.com) |
The "AI clone wars" arriving soon.
"Anything you create can be created without investment cost while also being unique in design as well as delivering the same function or experience"
From - https://dakara.substack.com/p/ai-and-the-end-to-all-things
Some individuals serving in the public sector might want to "control your thoughts" with this new scary technology, but I think that's FUD and you're much more likely to encounter the private sector trying to control your thoughts.
The author mentions how large corporations will be very slow to adopt because of "endless processes and approvals," but fails to mention government bureaucracy. Yet "government" is mentioned in the story twice as much.
They are not mutually exclusive. However, there is significant precedent for government interest in controlling population narratives. We have agencies that exist for that purpose alone.
Additionally, Twitter Files just recently got another personal interpretation from the court which has now just blocked the government from such previous actions.
IMO "following the money" indicates their disruptive wholesale access-restrictions are driven by much blander profit-seeking reasons.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-66093324#:~:text=On%20Sa....
Scary government is disproportionately represented in the story you linked, that’s all I’m observing here.
Instead they announced punishing fees on everyone and everything with barely any warning. That looks a lot more like a general push for blanket monetization. Their "nasty AI learning made us do it" statement looks more like a convenient excuse to deflect user-anger while simultaneously getting their company name in the news right next to hot buzzwords.