Not a criticism of reality or the question, but an unrelated observation:
I find it super interesting that were at a point in time where we would find it faster to ask a computer to randomly generate a short sequence of notes rather than just, like, writing them out.
This is a good example of a class of problem where it would be so much easier for me to describe any of several workflows:
punch it into Dorico directly,
write it on some staff paper,
put it in logic and have it output notes,
or just stick with Arban/Rabath/Rubank/Dotzaur/et al because, functionally, most useful possible permutations of exercises have been written out somewhere by some one (with the added benefit that they were probably written out by people thinking about speicfic issues like string crossings or the break on a clarinet)
Any of those seems infinitely faster it would be to figure out how to get a LLM to randomly stumble on the exercise based on its training data.
Even if I am a just a musician and not a tech bro, I'm happy that we live in a world where that seems like an easier route to randomly generate that material than to just write it out.