I’ll be interested how they will implement the interactions framework with hands and eye gaze at that price point. Meta’s hand / eye interaction stack is not great after several years. Apple’s one looks ok, to be tested. Better market it as a dumb screen and focus on visual clarity. A large 2D surface would go a long way in the market if done properly.

Is anyone aware of a "spatial computing" approach that is more original than floating rectangles?

I wonder how they can manage all this tech for that price. 4K displays, flat design, eye tracking, excellent passthrough for 750$?

It's too pricey for me to preorder, yet it seems a lot price for all that expensive tech. I wonder how they'll manage that.

The product was actually announced some weeks ago - the pre-orders are now available to book.

For $500 you get a resolution of 2.5K per eye. People who've used HMDs to mirror their desktop GUIs, is that enough for all-day "professional" work?

This seems just like Vision Pro but reasonably priced!

> You'd need to order the magnetic lens inserts for your prescription. To achieve a sleek fit, glasses cannot fit under Visor.

:/

holy hell I hate that website so much I might not give them my money sheerly from that; what user hatred they have for me. It's not just the "scroll to have things swoosh in" that I guess makes me not a cool kid, but the idea that I'm going to click on a thousand plus signs to read a goddamn faq is just ... who is the audience for that shit? someone with only one question? damn

my trickery of `document.querySelectorAll('.c-faq-icon').forEach(it => it.click())` didn't work because it collapses the other elements when it expands one but thankfully `document.querySelectorAll('.c-faq-a').forEach(it => it.setAttribute('style', ''))` does