1. Why does the article describe the technique as persisting through password changes, and then ends by recommending a password change?

(answer: "Changing the password alone may not be sufficient. The exploit allows the regeneration of authentication cookies even after a password reset, but only once. To fully secure the account, users should log out of all sessions and revoke any suspicious connections.")

2. Was this a flub on Google's end? How does this even happen? Was the multilogin API not checking revocation like all other Google APIs or what?

3. Is it conspiratorial to say maybe this was intentional, or intentionally not fixed here?

I'd seen speculation that this was used as part of some sort of account recovery flow, where those invalid sessions/tokens might be a useful signal. But I can't imagine why such a feature would re-validate those tokens.

What is “Booming”? Is the capitalisation intended?