Gulf stream collapse – What's the plan?(theguardian.com) |
Gulf stream collapse – What's the plan?(theguardian.com) |
So 30 years later, it's been 1.5 deg Celsius. And it's getting much closer to collapse - like... real close. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/05/climate-...
They have been obviously a bitt too optimistic in their estimate.
Now let's play a game of conspiration theory...
Maybe 30 years ago, some lobby decided they'd make some more money by scewing the report ... ( because they can - and also - because those who could lobby - couldn't care less about their children's future... 30 years was at that time enough time to enjoy life on their own agenda ).
Reducing population is their goal - so when shit hits the fan - and the gulf stream dies - which would trigger an immediate ice age - there would be enough food for all survivors - so it doesn't become Zombie Land - where we all run around with an axe - for food ... and to keep warm.
After MRNA engineered to slowly decrease population over a decade - just in case it is 2035 instead of 2025.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA
Or just making plan for a Nuclear (who got the longest p3ni5) competition to raise the global temperature by a few degree...
What's the maddest conspiration theory you guys can think off?
MRNA - for example - could be an effective plan to reduce the population quite effectively, by making sure that every year, there is 10% of 20-30 years old excess death... (real numbers so far across 2022 and 2023)
Also, apply Hanlon's Razor(1) to this. Is it more likely that people made a stupid choice and gambled that everything would be fine? Or is it more likely that they completely understood what they were choosing and decided to implement a grand conspiracy which continued after they were no longer in power?
I would gladly attribute it to stupidity if I logically could.
However - it takes quite some skills to get at the top of the food chain - I wouldn't classify physical attributes - like being a dumb athlete, good at running marathons while wearing corporate outfits - as a requirement - to fill- up those leadership roles.
Actuality quite the opposite - I would guess that someone - to get to that positions - has to demonstrate a tremendous tenacity and cunning capabilities - so they can convince they are better, stronger and more capable to take decisions - while not holding a basic degree (or even experience) in the area they are designated to lead.
Mostly exception - where you would see a minister of transport - having any experience on how to change a Tyre, a minister of health - being in good health - with at least 3 doctorates in medicine, psychology and philosophy.... Those exception are so little - that it is fair to say that it is pure con skills that get those people in position of power.
I have myself - worked for several short term governmental contract - observed that the person at the top of the food chain in those department - don't get elected - and are often totally incompetent technically speaking. But are great at talking and doing politics. Anyone making them some shadow - or going against the established narrative quickly gets dismissed. They choose to promote ass suckers - because it makes their internal political life easier.
Once they get the seat - it is for life, they won't get fired - unless they get caught doing something really offensive, such as sexual abuse - or money laundering. But they won't get fired for making obvious mistakes...
And of course, they often have to promote the most incompetent individual - when promotion is due...
Maybe I didn't got lucky, and got to always land on that ** contract - but of what I have talked around - and observed in human nature + logic deduction, I believe this is pretty much everywhere the same.