Not really sure about the details, but the lack of transparency around issues of this nature is what bothers me the most. At some point Elon claimed he would be more transparent about accounts receiving limited reach and other such deboosting, but so far it appears to remain pretty opaque.
That meeting was extremely suspicious to say the least, and no doubt what we're seeing is a result of it.
And this is just the surface we can see, I wonder how far the rabbit hole goes, hes probably in the top 5 most famous people in the world, whatever he says online will reverberate far, hence the israeli top priority being to change his mind carrot or stick. In addition, he admitted to having a mild form of Aspergers, so I guess social pressure and persuasion definitely impacts him differently than neurotypical folks.
Or like being blamed for not supplying but also supplying starlink to Russian territory
Specifically this one:
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620
This is racist, first because it's close to justifying violence against Jews, because of their religion, because of something a country did. Again, nobody would doubt "muslims deserve to be attacked because of what is happening in Sudan" is extremely racist. This is close to that.
And let's please make one thing clear: physically attacking zionists, or justifying that, because of Gaza is also extremely racist.
Secondly it's accusing "those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country" (ie. muslim immigrants) of being violent racists.
What DOESN'T matter is whether either of these are true behaviors seen in those groups. You're a racist if you say that either attacking Jews because of Israel is valid (obviously) and you're a racist if you say that muslim immigrants (even veiled) are antisemitic as a group.
Saying SPECIFIC Jews are going too far, or SPECIFIC muslim immigrants are a serious piece of racist asshole is not racist.
Gosh, I wonder if there was some other difference that people were concerned about /s
Miguel de Icaza is a random person to censor. I'm sure it's just a crude, automated policy that goes off the content of the tweet and his account having a large follower count.
Not so long ago all the accusation was the he was anti-Semitic.
The cognitive dissonance is loud.
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2023-10-03/ty-article-opinio...
Seriously, there are all sorts of political and economic reasons to follow along with Israel against Arabs even if you hate Jews.
https://free.messianicbible.com/feature/end-time-prophecy-wh...
If you think the current speaker for the House of Representatives doesn't believe this, I'd suggest further reading.
Zionism is not Judaism.
Search probably just ranks in part by a sentiment analysis (positivity) score and there's probably a minimum cutoff.
It was definitely a piece of obnoxious drivel, the post. But that's not what it said.
