MSFT's WizardLM2 models have been taken down

DreamGen 2 years ago |

They were released under Apache 2.0 and there are backups in case they decide to not release them, or to only release them after further alignment:

https://huggingface.co/dreamgen/WizardLM-2-7B

https://huggingface.co/dreamgen/WizardLM-2-8x22B

Workaccount2 2 years ago |

It was released under apache 2 and plenty of people already downloaded it so, sorry MS, the cat is already out of the bag on this one.

panqueca 2 years ago | |

You can find some smaller versions like 7B, but the most powerful one, the 70B parameters, was never released.

According to this reddit discussion here:

- https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1c554ot/i_hope_...

Mathnerd314 2 years ago | | |

No, the 8x22 (~140B) is more powerful than the 70B, it had higher eval score according to the blog. But 70B was based on LLama whereas the 8x22 and 7B were mixtral/mistral-based.

Weryj 2 years ago |

What a great opportunity to see what affect the fine tuning will have and possibly infer what they mean by harm reduction

panqueca 2 years ago |

They also removed the github page too.

- https://wizardlm.github.io/WizardLM2

panqueca 2 years ago | |

Web Archive version:

- https://web.archive.org/web/20240415221214/https://wizardlm....

vldmrs 2 years ago |

Why have they been removed ?

calebrob6 2 years ago | |

It looks like it needs to go through toxicity testing -- https://twitter.com/WizardLM_AI/status/1780101465950105775

haolez 2 years ago | | |

I can't imagine how toxicity in a LLM can be harmful. Can't we write stories with toxic characters, for example?

It feels like the greatest minds of our era are creating an amazing piece of technology. And we are hindering it in the name of corporate cover ass and bullshit jobs.

mistrial9 2 years ago | | |

if you read the large theory papers on human-computer LLM interfaces, the people who build these are genuinely worried about "harm" . Impolitely, it appears from the outside that the kind of researchers that they have attracted over a decade to do this fantastically tedious and abstract work, are covered in emotional illness symptoms personally, and developed a culture of incessantly declaring "harm" in every shadow of every corner; at the same time, corporate black-hearts have money on the mind, and are genuinely worried about "harm" in the form of consumer retaliation in the marketplace, massive legal liability for civil rights blunders, and losing the sweet spot to a competitor; then government at the executive level, at the Nation-State, are obsessing about obtaining and implementing AI for competitive advantage against just about every other group of people you can name -- as long as no one can prove that they implemented "harm" while getting unprecedented competitive advantages at scale over populations of unwitting civilians, their geopolitical rivals, and probably other political types of a different stripe.

So no, it is not "bs jobs" at all .. but worse

haolez 2 years ago | | |

That's another point, but I agree. The government's incentives are to become bigger and more powerful. LLM control could be a fast lane to become a totalitarian state. Governments around the world might not do that by choice, but the incentive is true and is present.

95014_refugee 2 years ago | | |

If you think that you want to live in a world where your life is heavily influenced by machines that were trained on the idea that you don’t deserve to exist, then yes, “toxicity” isn’t a problem.

But you don’t think that. Even if you think you do.

haolez 2 years ago | | |

But instead, they are trained on what some corporation or government thinks is good for me. How's that any better? Do you trust them to be neutral and act in your best interest? Who defined toxicity?

A "neutral" policy here is probably a still unsolved philosophy problem.

qball 2 years ago | | |

I already live in this world. That is why I don't want my models censored; they're already spewing that toxicity.

(It's just your brand of toxicity, so naturally, you don't think it's a problem.)

spuzz 2 years ago | | |

You can't even define toxicity in an objective and verifiable way, because it's inherently subjective.

Trying to make rules for a machine to behave in a decidedly nontoxic way is a fool's errand, then.

You're also assuming that AI is going to be used to heavily influence people's lives, but there's a good chance that all it's good for is ripping off copyrighted material and generating clipart that's good enough for powerpoint presentations.

AI is probably going to change the world in the way that NFTs did. And self driving cars. And the Alexa.

latexr 2 years ago | | |

> It feels like the greatest minds of our era are

This is the new “we could put a man on the moon, yet…”. No, “the greatest minds of our era” are not working in adtech or building LLMs. It’s easy to forget, but there is a whole world outside of computers, and being good at it does not equate to being “a great mind”. It is absurd to believe the greatest minds are all working around the same problem spaces.

haolez 2 years ago | | |

Fair, but that's not central to my argument. My point still holds.

benterix 2 years ago | | |

So this is a good thing for people like me who don't care if some piece of software is "toxic" with me or not.

perrygeo 2 years ago | | |

It was trained on content from the internet. I'd be massively surprised if it somehow wasn't toxic. Humanity (or a small portion of it) is full of assholes. As much as that sucks, shouldn't the embeddings reflect the reality of the training content? If you want fluffy bunnies and flowers and happy people holding hands, shouldn't you just train it on that content?

null_point 2 years ago | | |

Toxicity testing? That a self-imposed requirement by Microsoft?

tmearnest 2 years ago | | |

I don’t think they forgot about Tay.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/in-2016-microsofts-racist-chatbot-...

clemyjontri 2 years ago | | |

I asked GPT-4 to rewrite the refrain from Eminem's "Forgot about Dre" but change it to "Forgot about Tay" and make it all about chatbots... this is the best one it came up with:

Nowadays, every bot wanna chat

Like they got something to say, but these LLMs

Are too toxic to use, just a waste of GPUs

And the programmers act like they forgot about Tay.

cies 2 years ago | | |

Marketing most likely. What if news headlines say: MS LLMs Make Racist Remarks

With lots of juicy examples.

Not that I care. But MS' marketing does.

omneity 2 years ago |

The team has commented that they skipped a step in the microsoft release process (toxicity check). This is a nothingburger.

https://twitter.com/WizardLM_AI/status/1780101465950105775