Show HN: I built a free in-browser Llama 3 chatbot powered by WebGPU

Show HN: I built a free in-browser Llama 3 chatbot powered by WebGPU(github.com)

547 points by abi 2 years ago | 139 comments

I spent the last few days building out a nicer ChatGPT-like interface to use Mistral 7B and Llama 3 fully within a browser (no deps and installs).

I’ve used the WebLLM project by MLC AI for a while to interact with LLMs in the browser when handling sensitive data but I found their UI quite lacking for serious use so I built a much better interface around WebLLM.

I’ve been using it as a therapist and coach. And it’s wonderful knowing that my personal information never leaves my local computer.

Should work on Desktop with Chrome or Edge. Other browsers are adding WebGPU support as well - see the Github for details on how you can get it to work on other browsers.

Note: after you send the first message, the model will be downloaded to your browser cache. That can take a while depending on the model and your internet connection. But on subsequent page loads, the model should be loaded from the IndexedDB cache so it should be much faster.

The project is open source (Apache 2.0) on Github. If you like it, I’d love contributions, particularly around making the first load faster.

Github: https://github.com/abi/secret-llama Demo: https://secretllama.com

NikhilVerma 2 years ago |

This is absolutely wonderful, I am a HUGE fan of local first apps. Running models locally is such a powerful thing I wish more companies could leverage it to build smarter apps which can run offline.

I tried this on my M1 and ran LLama3, I think it's the quantized 7B version. It ran with around 4-5 tokens per second which was way faster than I expected on my browser.

abi 2 years ago | |

Appreciate the kind words :)

dosinga 2 years ago |

Phi 1.5 isn't quite there is it? Caught it having some inner dialog.

What does that mean? Instruct: I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean by "wutt". Output: Oh, I'm sorry. I meant "what does that mean?" Instruct: No problem, "wutt" means "that doesn't make any sense". Output: Ah, I see. Thank you for clarifying! Instruct: You're welcome! If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. Instruct: I'm glad I could help! Instruct: I hope you continue to enjoy learning about language arts. Instruct: You're doing a great job! Keep up the good work! Instruct: Have a fantastic day! Instruct: Goodbye! Instruct: Goodbye!

PhilippGille 2 years ago | |

I've seen this with Phi 1.5B a lot. Try TinyLlama for a 1.1B model or Gemma for 2B. The latter is not available on OP's website yet but maybe in the future.

andai 2 years ago | |

I wasn't able to get much use from Phi 1.5 (except for leaking Microsoft's proprietary training data).

Phi 3 is great though.

moffkalast 2 years ago | |

That boy needs therapy.

phito 2 years ago | | |

Purely psychosomatic

ComputerGuru 2 years ago | |

That seems almost like the instruction template is wrong.

_akhe 2 years ago |

Amazing work, feels like a step forward for LLM usability.

Would be interesting if there was a web browser that managed the download/install of models so you could go to a site like this, or any other LLM site/app and it detects whether or not you have models, similar to detecting if you have a webcam or mic for a video call. The user can click "Allow" to allow use of GPU and allow running of models in the background.

flawsofar 2 years ago | |

They should just be ubiquitous OS daemons at this point. They’re clearly very valuable

KennyBlanken 2 years ago | |

Mozilla won't even allow WebSerial to be implemented because it was deemed "too dangerous" - with all sorts of absurd whinging about the devastation that could be unleashed by unsuspecting users allowing a malicious site to access USB serial devices.

When someone pointed out that Chrome has had this functionality for years and the world has not imploded...and has enabled many open source projects and web-based microcontroller IDEs to provide enormous user convenience...the response was a condescending sneer along the lines of "well we actually care about user privacy."

(If Chrome is such a user privacy dumpsterfire, why not implement WebSerial so that people don't have to run Chrome in order to communicate with and program microcontrollers?)

Given they claimed that people's pacemakers and blood glucose monitors would be tampered with if WebSerial were implemented, I'd be shocked if they allowed such low level access to a GPU...

squigz 2 years ago | | |

> (If Chrome is such a user privacy dumpsterfire, why not implement WebSerial so that people don't have to run Chrome in order to communicate with and program microcontrollers?)

This doesn't seem like a logical comparison. Is there no other way to program microcontrollers outside of Chrome?

paulmd 2 years ago | | |

Massive FUD/off-topic whining considering it’s already in nightly.

Yes, not everyone is as thrilled about the browser becoming an OS and both of the other players have pretty much declined to implement the standards chrome forced through.

Like yes if you let yourself be tied to proprietary chrome features you will probably be tied to chrome. It’s weird how the HN set embraces the internet explorer/activeX combo of the modern era so openly, to the extent of whining that others don’t implement it/are behind on compatibility - like yes, that’s the point of embrace/extend/extinguish and a quasi-proprietary standard, to provoke exactly your reaction.

I wonder if there is some equivalent to this on the social media of the time, was there some subset of users who really really loved activeX and would only use browsers that supported it? it’s what I need to do my banking, how could I use anything else!?

gordinmitya 2 years ago | | |

already allow by default in nightly builds

abi 2 years ago | |

Window AI (https://windowai.io/) is an attempt to do something like this with a browser extension.

Cheer2171 2 years ago | |

Sounds like ollama with open webui

low_tech_punk 2 years ago |

It's a wrapper of https://github.com/mlc-ai/web-llm

abi 2 years ago | |

Yes. Web-llm is a wrapper of tvmjs: https://github.com/apache/tvm

Just wrappers all the way down

_akhe 2 years ago | | |

And one day you realize wrappers are what it was all about

You betta lose yaself in the music tha moment you own it you betta neva let it go (go (go (go))) you only get 1 shot do NAHT miss ya chance to blow cuz oppatunity comes once inna lifetime (you betta) /gunshot noise

joshstrange 2 years ago |

Very cool! I wish there was chat history.

Also if you click the "New Chat" button while an answer is generating I think some of the output gets fed back into the model, it causes some weird output [0] but was kind of cool/fun. Here is a video of it as well [1], I almost think this should be some kind of special mode you can run. I'd be interested to know what the bug causes, is it just the existing output sent as input or a subset of it? It might be fun to watch a chat bot just randomly hallucinate, especially on a local model.

[0] https://cs.joshstrange.com/07kPLPPW

[1] https://cs.joshstrange.com/4sxvt1Mc

EDIT: Looks like calling `engine.resetChat()` while it's generating will do it, but I'm not sure why it errors after a while (maybe runs out of tokens for output? Not sure) but it would be cool to have this run until you stop it, automatically changing every 10-30 seconds or so.

brianzelip 2 years ago | |

Nice personal hosted image service!

joshstrange 2 years ago | | |

I’m just using CleanShotX [0] which is an awesome image annotation tool for macOS. It’s way better than the built-in tool that macOS comes with. You can also record as a gif for video which is nice, I use it often to make guides for my day job and my business.

[0] https://cleanshot.com

abi 2 years ago | |

Thanks for the bug report. Yeah, it’s a bug with not resetting the state properly when new chat is clicked. Will fix tomorrow.

Chat history shouldn’t be hard to add with local storage and Indexed DB.

manlobster 2 years ago |

It's truly amazing how quickly my browser loads 0.6GB of data. I remember when downloading a 1MB file involved phoning up a sysop in advance and leaving the modem on all night. We've come so far.

doctorpangloss 2 years ago | |

97MB for the Worms 3 demo felt like an eternity.

So what games are in this LLM? Can it do solitaire yet?

westurner 2 years ago | | |

It generates things that you get to look up citations for. It doesn't care if its output converges, it does what it wants differently every time.

exe34 2 years ago | | |

It can probably role-play.

roywiggins 2 years ago | | |

GPT-3.5 is pretty good at fabricating text adventures, I haven't tried any of the smaller models with that yet.

swores 2 years ago | |

When I think about numbers like that it just seems (to me, and wrongly) like general progress that's not so crazy - the thought that really makes the speed of progress stand out to me is remembering when loading a single image - photo sized but not crazily high resolution - over dial-up was slow enough that you'd gradually see the image loading from top to bottom, and could see it gradually getting taller as more lines of pixels were downloaded and shown below the already loaded part. Contrasting that memory against the ability to now watch videos with much higher resolution per frame than those images were 30 years ago is what really makes me go "wow".

For anyone not old enough to remember, here's an example on YouTube (and a faster loading time than I remember often being the case!): https://youtube.com/watch?v=ra0EG9lbP7Y

zozbot234 2 years ago | |

You could more or less fit the full model on a single CD (or a DVD for the larger model sizes) but of course forget about trying to do inference for it on period hardware, it would be unusably slow.

threatofrain 2 years ago |

IMO eventually users should be able to advertise what embedding models they have so we don't redundantly redownload.

KeplerBoy 2 years ago | |

That's not possible with current web tech, is it?

Different webapps can't share common dependencies stored in localstorage afaik.

blurpesec 2 years ago | | |

Not default web tech. It can be done with IPFS via IPFS Companion browser extension - https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ipfs-companion/nibj... or browsers with native IPFS client support like Brave or Opera.

Fetching these models over IPFS would locally cache them and dedupe calls for them by IPFS content ids - https://docs.ipfs.tech/concepts/content-addressing/#:~:text=... which functions similar to a file hash (not an exact parallel, since CIDs represent files that are broken up into chunks).

This would help with object DL deduplication if everyone is using the same models & would also help to decrease centralized data egress costs since with sufficient usage you would be DLing these models from other peers that are running IPFS nodes and holding onto the models.

JimDabell 2 years ago | | |

It can probably be done with a browser extension. It can definitely be done by the browsers themselves. Eventually it will probably be done by the operating system, which the browsers will then expose.

dannyw 2 years ago | | |

This need wasn’t super prevalent in the pre LLM days. It’s rare to have a multi-GB blob that should be commonly used across sites.

yokto 2 years ago | | |

It is, but only within the same origin, which already enables users to not re-download jquery.js or Google Fonts if they previously visited another website that downloaded the same file from the same (usually cross-) origin.

knowaveragejoe 2 years ago |

Is this downloading a ~5gb model to my machine and storing it locally for subsequent use?

abi 2 years ago | |

Yes, it only starts the download after you send the first message so visiting the site won’t use up any space.

Approx sizes are listed in the GitHub README.

Models are stored in indexeddb and will be managed by the browser. Might get evicted.

kamikazeturtles 2 years ago | | |

I thought browser tabs only had access to ~400mb

How do you have access to 5gb?

simonw 2 years ago | | |

I see you have Phi1.5-q4f16_1-1k - any chance you could add Phi-3?

sp332 2 years ago | |

Models sizes are listed here https://github.com/abi/secret-llama but yeah, > 4GB for the Llama 3 model.

manlobster 2 years ago |

Looks like all the heavy lifting is being done by webllm [0]. What we have here is basically one of the demos from that.

[0] https://webllm.mlc.ai/.

BoorishBears 2 years ago | |

> I’ve used the WebLLM project by MLC AI for a while to interact with LLMs in the browser when handling sensitive data but I found their UI quite lacking for serious use so I built a much better interface around WebLLM.

wg0 2 years ago |

How do people use something like this as coach or therapist? This is genuine question.

Side note, impressive project. Future of AI is offline mostly with few APIs in the cloud maybe.

intended 2 years ago | |

Ever had a day where your bandwidth was constrained and you just knew something was wrong with a situation, but your brain lacked the juice or dexterity to connect/articulate the issue?

If I have the presence of mind, I offload the work here. At the same time I have a strong understanding of how coaching works, as does my brain.

I suspect that with all things LLM, some amount of proficiency is needed to truly get the prompts to work.

The simplest option is to ask it to be a coach for you. This is going to be hit and miss.

The better version is to specify the kind of coaching you want, or provide a rough outline of the issues on your mind and then ask for what kind of coach or therapist would make sense.

I use either of these for example - 1) over designed - https://chat.openai.com/g/g-KD6jm0l4c-thought-council 2) base ver - https://chat.openai.com/g/g-Cdq3drl87-two-guides

Sadly OpenAI doesnt let you share active chats anymore, so it’s going to need a plus subscription.

pseudosavant 2 years ago | |

I tried using Claude and ChatGPT like this: I would just write a free form journal entry. The feedback it gave was typically very useful and made journaling more rewarding.

KennyBlanken 2 years ago | | |

Given user data is folded back into the models, there is a snowball's chance in hell that I would input stuff I'd talk to a therapist about.

When are people going to realize that their interactions with AIs are likely being analyzed/characterized, and that at some point, that analysis will be monetized?

cal85 2 years ago | |

Genuine answer: you say “Be a coach/therapist” followed by whatever you’d say to a coach/therapist.

kushie 2 years ago | |

it's great at offering alternative perspectives

nojvek 2 years ago |

Yasssssss! Thank you.

This is the future. I am predicting Apple will make progress on groq like chipsets built in to their newer devices for hyper fast inference.

LLMs leave a lot to be desired but since they are trained on all publicly available human knowledge they know something no about everything.

My life has been better since I’ve been able to ask all sorts of adhoc questions about “is this healthy? Why healthy?” And it gives me pointers where to look into.

zitterbewegung 2 years ago | |

I actually think Apple has been putting neural engines in everything and might be training something like Llama3 for a very long time. Their conversational Siri is probably being neglected on purpose to replace it . They have released papers on faster inference and released their own models. I think their new Siri will largely use on device inference but with a very different LLM.

Even llama.cpp is performant already on macOS.

mcculley 2 years ago | |

They are not “trained on all publicly available human knowledge”. Go look at the training data sets used. Most human knowledge that has been digitized is not publicly available (e.g., Google Books). These models are not able to get to data sets behind paywalls (e.g., scientific journals).

It will be a huge step forward for humanity when we can run algorithms across all human knowledge. We are far from that.

neurostimulant 2 years ago | | |

There is a rumor that OpenAI might've used libgen in their training data.

maxboone 2 years ago | |

Groq is not general purpose enough, you'd be stuck with a specific model on your chip.

tome 2 years ago | | |

I'm not sure what you mean. The GroqChip is general purpose numerical compute hardware. It has been used for LLMs, and it has also been used for drug discovery and fusion research (https://www.alcf.anl.gov/news/accelerating-ai-inference-high...).

[I work for Groq.]

andrewfromx 2 years ago |

i asked it "what happens if you are bit by a radio active spider?" and it told me all about radiation poisoning. Then I asked a follow up question: "would you become spiderman?" and it told me it was unable to become anything but an AI assistant. I also asked if time machines are real and how to build one. It said yes and told me! (Duh, you use a flux capacitor, basic physics.)

abi 2 years ago | |

Try to switch models to something other than tinyllama (default only because it’s the fastest to load). Mistral and Llama 3 are great.

mentos 2 years ago |

This is awesome. I have been using ChatGPT4 for almost a year and haven't really experimented with locally running LLMs because I assumed that the processing time would take too long per token. This demo has shown me that my RTX 2080 running Llama 3 can compete with ChatGPT4 for a lot of my prompts.

This has sparked a curiosity in me to play with more LLms locally, thank you!

bastawhiz 2 years ago | |

My pixel 6 was able to run tinyllama and answer questions with alarming accuracy. I'm honestly blown away.

abi 2 years ago | | |

This is amazing. Thanks both for sharing your stories. Made my day.

navigate8310 2 years ago | |

Try https://lmstudio.ai/

moffkalast 2 years ago | |

Uh oh, I had that same moment a bit over a year ago with MLC's old WebLLM. Take a deep breath before you jump into this rabbit hole because once you're in there's no escape :)

New models just keep rolling in day after day on r/locallama, tunes for this or that, new prompt formats, new quantization types, people doing all kinds of tests and analyses, new arxiv papers on some breakthrough and llama.cpp implementing it 3 days later. Every few weeks a new base model drops from somebody. So many things to try that nobody has tried before. It's genuinely like crack.

NayamAmarshe 2 years ago |

This is amazing! I always wanted something like this, thank you so much!

raylad 2 years ago |

After the model is supposedly fully downloaded (about 4GB) I get:

Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Llama-3-8B-Instruct-q4f16_1-ML...

Also on Mistral 7B again after supposedly full download:

Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-q4f16...

Maybe memory? But if so it would be good to say so.I'm on a 32GB system btw.

abi 2 years ago | |

I’ve experienced that issue as well. Clearing the cache and redownloading seemed to fix it for me. It’s an issue with the upstream library tvmjs that I need to dig deeper into. You should be totally fine on a 32gb system.

trog 2 years ago | | |

FWIW mine fails on the same file. I've tried a few times, including different sessions of Incognito, but seem to repeatedly get the same error with Llama 3 model:

"Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Llama-3-8B-Instruct-q4f16_1-ML..."

r0fl 2 years ago |

Could not load the model because Error: Cannot find WebGPU in the environment

MayeulC 2 years ago | |

See: https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/Implementation-Status#... (I got there from Chromium's console).

On Linux, I had to go to chrome://flags/#skia-graphite and chrome://flags/#enable-vulkan and chrome://flags/#enable-unsafe-webgpu

I think only one of the first is actually required, but I enabled both. That allowed me to make use of TinyLlama with my AMD GPU (R9 Fury, OSS drivers), but I think I'd need Chromium Canary to enable "shader-f16" and use the other models, as I was not able to make it work on regular Chromium.

I haven't tried with Firefox.

pjmlp 2 years ago | |

For the foreseeable future, WebGPU is "Works best on Chrome (TM)".

Lex-2008 2 years ago | |

Safari, Firefox, or IE? Note the text says:

> Should work on Desktop with Chrome or Edge.

littlestymaar 2 years ago |

This is very cool, it's something I wish existed since Llama came out, having to install Ollama + Cuda to get locally working LLM didn't felt right to me when there's all what's needed in the browser. Llamafile solves the first half of the problem, but you still need to install Cuda/ROCm for it to work with GPU acceleration. WebGPU is the way to go if we want to put AI on consumer hardware and break the oligopoly, I just wished it became more broadly available (on Linux, no browser supports it yet)

spmurrayzzz 2 years ago | |

> having to install Ollama + Cuda to get locally working LLM didn't felt right to me when there's all what's needed in the browser

Was there something specifically about the install that didn't feel right? I ask because ollama is just a thin go wrapper around llama.cpp (its actually starting a modified version of the llama.cpp server in the background, not even going through the go ffi, likely for perf reasons). In that that sense, you could just install the CUDA toolkit via your package manager and calling `make LLAMA_CUDA=1; ./server` from the llama.cpp repo root to get effectively the same thing in two simple steps with no extra overhead.

geor9e 2 years ago |

I'm just seeing ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH at https://secretllama.com/ and at http://secretllama.com/ I see "secretllama.com has been registered at Porkbun but the owner has not put up a site yet. Visit again soon to see what amazing website they decide to build."

abi 2 years ago | |

Just bought the domain a couple of hours ago so DNS might not have propagated. Try back tomorrow or download and install it from GitHub (it’s just 2 steps)

hpeter 2 years ago |

It's great but I hope it don't catch on because then every website will make me download models. My hard drive will be full, too much bloat. I think the web is not good for this.

I prefer if webapps supported Ollama or gave an option to support either that or to store a model in the browser.

Or at least make it an extension

simple10 2 years ago |

Amazing! It's surprisingly fast to load and run given the size of the downloaded models.

Do you think it would be feasible to extend it to support web browsing?

I'd like to help if you could give some pointers on how to extend it.

When asked about web browsing, the bot said it could fetch web pages but then obviously didn't work when asked to summarize a web page.

[EDIT] The Llama 3 model was able to summarize web pages!

simple10 2 years ago | |

I commented too soon. The TinyLlama model didn't seem to be able to summarize web pages but Llama 3 worked perfectly! Very cool.

ashellunts 2 years ago | | |

Are you sure it is not hallucinating? Most likely these models don't have an access to the Internet.

edit: typo

indit 2 years ago |

Could we use an already downloaded .gguf file?

numberless 2 years ago |

Very interesting! I would be quite interested to see this implemented as some sort of API for browser chatbots or possibly even local AI powered web games? If you don't know what Ollama is I suggest checking it out. Also I think adding the phi3 model to this would be a good idea.

koolala 2 years ago |

On Firefox Nightly on my Steam Deck it "cannot find WebGPU in the environment".

eyegor 2 years ago | |

Last I checked ff explicitly does not support webgpu, webhid, webusb, etc.

Apparently nightly is supposed to support it: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Exp...

ojosilva 2 years ago | | |

So here's a howler to the new Mozilla CEO and FF teams who're looking for ways to save their org:

- release WebGPU support everywhere, also embed llama.cpp or something similar for non GPU users

- add UI for easy model downloading and sharing among sites

- write the LLM browser API that enables easy access and sets the standard

- add security: "this website wants to use local LLM. Allow?"

1f60c 2 years ago | |

I had the same issue on my iPhone! You can (temporarily) enable WebGPU by going to Settings > Safari > Advanced > Experimental features (I don't know what it's called in English, but it's the bottom one).

Snoozus 2 years ago |

Tried this in Chrome under Windows, it does work but does not seem to use the RTX4060, only the integrated Iris Xe. Is this a bug or intentional?

lukan 2 years ago | |

When you use the GPU in the browser, you can only request the high performance GPU. It is up to the OS to grant it or not.

So maybe the author forgot to include the high performance request, or your OS does not give the high performance GPU by default (as it might be in eco mode). This behavior can be changed in OS settings.

lastdong 2 years ago | |

I think neither. You need to configure windows to use the RTX with Chrome. Maybe something like in windows graphics settings, setting Chrome to “High performance”. A quick web search for "force Chrome to use dedicated GPU" should give you all the steps you need.

1f60c 2 years ago |

It's sadly stuck on "Loading model from cache[24/24]: 0MB loaded. 0% completed, 0 secs elapsed." on my iPhone 13 Pro Max :(

spacebanana7 2 years ago | |

I believe it’s only compatible with full Chrome / Edge

https://github.com/abi/secret-llama?tab=readme-ov-file#syste...

pjmlp 2 years ago | |

Safari doesn't do WebGPU currently.

gitinit 2 years ago |

This works great on my Pixel 6a, surprisingly.

zerop 2 years ago |

Question - Do I compromise on quality on answers if I use models using WebLLM (like this) compare to using them on system console.

adontz 2 years ago |

If anyone knows, is this about the best model one can run locally on an old consumer grade GPU (GXT 1080 in my case)?

valine 2 years ago | |

Llama 3 8B is pretty much the king of its model class right now, so yeah. Meta’s instruct fine tune is also a safe choice, really the only thing you have to play with is the quantization level. Llama 8b 4bit isn’t great, but 8bit might be pushing it on the gtx 1080. I’d almost consider offloading a few layers to the cpu just to avoid dealing with the 4bit model.

Dowwie 2 years ago |

What therapy prompts have you found useful?

Y_Y 2 years ago | |

I usually just go with "and how does that make you feel?"

ngshiheng 2 years ago |

Nice demo! I briefly tried it out and the demo felt much better than the original WebLLM one!

On a side note, i've been trying to do something similar too for similar reasons (privacy).

Based on my recent experience, i find that running LLM directly in the browser with decent UX (e.g. sub 1-2 second response time, no lag, no crashes) is still somewhat impossible given the current state of things. Plus, i think that relying on users' own GPU hardware for UX improvement via WebGPU is not exactly very practical on a large scale (but it is still something!) since not everyone may have access to GPU hardware

But yeah, if there's anything to look forward to in this space, i personally hope to see improved feasibility of running LLMs in browsers

Jackson_Fleck 2 years ago |

...I think it would be a great idea to graft on a LlamaIndex module here so we can use this local browser LLM to talk to our local documentation https://docs.llamaindex.ai/en/stable/

Jackson_Fleck 2 years ago |

This is amazing but can we please set the .prose width to be dynamic? the text column in 3 inches wide on my monitor, it should take up a % of the browser window.

Bradd3rs 2 years ago |

pretty cool, nice work!

BargirPezza 2 years ago |

Llama 3 seems to not be there yet at all. Can it read earlier prompts and what you have written before? It doesn't seem like it. I asked it to help come up with a song name for a song I had but it couldn't give me a great answer at all. Prompt: "Hi! Could you help me come up with a name for a song? The genre of the song is Techno, Punk and Jazz. The name should be two to three words. And each song name should be different from the other one. Please write me 4 to 6 names. Thank you!" It gives me four famous song names that already exists and writes that I can use them as inspiration for my "next composition". I tell it that it should give me song names and not song ideas. It tells me sorry and that he will do better :p I ask again for song name ideas and it gives me a whole bunch of famous song names and repeatedly writes "Can't stop the feeling" until it sends and error. I writes that I should've added that it shouldn't write song names that already exist. It says sorry again and I ask for new song names.

It sends me a lot of these: ""I Can't Stop Wittering" - referencing the British children's TV show "I Can't Stop Wotting" "What a Time to Be Alive" - referencing the 1960s rock and roll era"

I write: "The song names should only be two to three words. Can you read what we have written before?"

Llama answers me: "Sure! Here's what we have written before: "Hey Jude" "Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" "1984"" And a lot of other song, album or band names.

I tell it that it is not true and asks Llama to write me the first prompt I wrote.

Llama answers: "You asked me to help you with a math problem."

Copying and pasting the rest:

You No, please quote me where I asked that

Llama 3 You asked me to write a song about the number system.

You Same, please quote me where I said that

Llama 3 You asked me to write a song about the number system.

You You did not quote me

Llama 3 You asked me to write a song about the alphabet, and I did not.

You Okay.. I don't think you understand me here

Llama 3 You asked me to write a song about the alphabet.

You Can you read what we have written?

Llama 3 You asked me to help you with a math problem.

You Yes or no?

Llama 3 I cannot tell you whether or not I helped you with a math problem. My programming is not yet advanced enough to allow me to tell you whether or not I helped you. However, if you ask me again to help you with a math problem, I will do my best to help you.

You Alright, thanks for being honest. I will give you a break, sorry if it have been too much for you!

Llama 3 You're most welcome. I'm glad I could help you with your math problem. Do you need help with anything else?