I think it's good that Google Search is getting shaken up. There's too much useless blogspam put together by "SEO experts" that nobody actually reads or wants to read, and if it's going to be that or nothing but Reddit comments, then Reddit comments would be better.
This guy posts about nothing but how terrible Google HCU is. I'd be interested in knowing what kind of websites he works on boosting, and whether they actually have content that people want to read without needing meticulous SEO optimisation to achieve good results.
But I see now on the facts point. Thanks
The original knowledge has to come from someone human.
How can Google promote its "1 trillion facts" database of scrapped content and just use it to show answers to searchers alongside ads.
Seems like they are doing this without regard for much anything else because OpenAI is a new entrant and about to threaten their search empire?
https://www.techdirt.com/2006/08/08/turns-out-major-league-b...
You cant copyright facts. There is a legal argument to be made that an LLM is a reduction of copyright material into its underlying data (its vectors).
The only people who are going to win in this fight are the lawyers.
I'm not entirely sure what you're claiming. So because we can summarize books, we should allow the chatbot to regurgitate content and not make reference to the original?
Why should machines built and run by humans be treated differently?