Ask HN: Do modern AI engines still need to do full re-trainings? I learned about ~AI algorithms in the 90s: backprocessing & clustering networks, and a little bit of genetic algos. I then focused & programmed & played for a while with the model of the "backpropagation" network, until the early 2000' => it was fun, but not usable in my context. I then stopped fiddling with it and became inactive in this context. An important property of a backpropagation network was (as much as I know) that it had to be fully re-trained whenever inputs changed (values of existing ones changed or inputs/outputs were removed/added). Question: Is it still like that for the currently fancy algos (the ones developed by Google/Facebook/OpenAI/Xsomething/...) or are they now better, so that they can now adapt without having to be fully retrained using the full set of (new/up-to-date) training data? Asking because I lost track of the progress in this area during the last 20 years and especially recently I understand nothing involving all new names (e.g. "llama", etc...). Thanks :) |