There Is No Website(thereisnoweb.site) |
There Is No Website(thereisnoweb.site) |
[1] https://mrdoob.com/projects/chromeexperiments/google-gravity...
Edit: added a PR (took just 12 mins to fix) https://github.com/AndreiBalan-dev/there-is-no-website/pull/...
If there are any other issues, I am here on a lookout :D
Not sure if I'm normal stuck or if something is supposed to happen past the "Seriously, you need to go."
EDIT: It's the three dots in the top right that are "unbreakable", I guess.
I argue that specifying where it doesn't work is pretty stupid. Just specify what you tested it on. It works on those and may or may not work on others. If you'd like it to work on other browsers you can see if you can contact the author to help them with financial support to get the other ones working.
This thing that is clearly NOT a website was initially done for a hackathon and I never expected it to get more than 5-6 users.
It's so amazing and a bit stressful, because I want to offer a great experience at the same time!! Today I tried to make it compatible on phone too mobile users. Hadn't too much time to test it out but I'm on the lookout for bugs.
I also found this post randomly, I was trying to find out why did Vercel sent me an email at 4 AM that I am using 100% of the free plan data LOL. I had to upgrade to pro.
Thanks to everyone for trying out this scuffed thing (which is NOT a website!!) haha. I had a deadline and only 26h left to create it, never knew it will get this many users!
Much love, Andrei.
Your connection is working correctly.
Vercel is working correctly.
402: PAYMENT_REQUIRED
Code: DEPLOYMENT_DISABLED
ID: iad1::wsp5p-1723935766368-682bf9ce559d
If you are a visitor, contact the website owner or try again later.If you are the owner, please read this documentation section.
Er... what does this mean? Firefox is not supported? If so, the author should just say that.
the author did say that, just in different wording
chrome and firefox are not the only browsers
Should be up now! Sorry for the inconvenience.
Bitdefender also popped up and warned me the site is risky, presumably due to what the code is doing. I scanned it on Virustotal & URLVoid and nothing was showing up there. It allowed me to proceed, however.
Web Protection by Bitdefender Untrusted page blocked for your protection http://thereisnoweb.site
Untrusted pages exhibit suspicious behavior or particularities we deem risky, therefore you should avoid accessing them to keep your data unharmed,.
< HTTP/2 308 < date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 00:13:45 GMT < content-type: text/plain < location: https://www.thereisnoweb.site/ < refresh: 0;url=https://www.thereisnoweb.site/
regardless of HTTP version
I'm not even disappointed, I'm impressed! That must have been a lot of work.
Also it looks like it expects a 16x9 aspect ratio or things can get stuck off screen.
But Lee saved me! He is working for Vercel and emailed me exactly when I needed him to assist me. I'll be grateful to him forever.
So yeah, this was the reason it was down. Not sure why Bitdefender deems the website risky. Maybe it's temporary..
Besides, it's not like this is a website anyway.
I would rather everything people make that runs in a browser work in every browser but I get that there have to be limits and that I'm not entitled to someone else's labor.
The only thing one can possibly blame on the developer is the wording.
I think the onus is on the developer to use standards that are well supported and to try to avoid standards like webUSB that are niche. To use semantic HTML and such so that the website fails in a more useful way to the end user when the standards aren't supported.
Given that one of those 3 requires sending thousands of dollars a year to Apple, I'd say "very".
Also, given that Google is a monopoly, I do place the onus on them to at minimum warn developers that they are deviating from well supported standards.
It's a little more nuanced than that.
Maybe the search money dont pay the bills but they definitely squandered their improvements