Sounds interesting and very plausible, but the piece is missing evidence. No timestamps, no dates, no names. It could have been written by anyone.

Why anonymous? If real, then there aren't that many people who fit the description (recent leaver with H1B visa who also participated in the mentioned activities), Twitter can easily pinpoint him, and send the Teletubbies to teach him a lesson. Otherwise, if he shared his name to be a real whistle blower, then that would change things.

But I have my doubts. About every statement in this article.

(Don't get me wrong, though my veins are not filled with Musk-hate, I believe that him entering politics is the one of the worst and stupidest things in this century so far)

Were there people that didn't know this was happening? I thought it was a forgone conclusion.