JEP 519: Compact Object Headers

JEP 519: Compact Object Headers(openjdk.org)

73 points by Skinney 361 days ago | 10 comments

SerCe 361 days ago |

The previous JEP 450 [1] has a lot more implementation details for those who are interested.

> They have been tested at Oracle by running the full JDK test suite. They have also been tested at Amazon by hundreds of services in production, most of them using backports of the feature to JDK 21 and JDK 17.

One of the underappreciated perks of working on platform teams in large (and very large in the case of Amazon) companies is that you've got a playground to see and quantify the impact of your performance work that few others have.

[1]: https://openjdk.org/jeps/450

nicktelford 361 days ago |

I find it a bit bizarre that this JEP doesn't enable Compact Object Headers by default. Most users will not know to specifically enable it, so if they're that confident in its stability and performance, why not enable it for everyone?

The JVM used to have a reputation for requiring byzantine flags to properly optimise its performance (mostly GC configuration). We've mostly left that behind these days, but it feels like JEP 519 takes a step backwards here.

jeroenhd 361 days ago | |

The JVM world is slow and extremely careful. If there's a chance something that once works breaks, it'll take many years before the change is applied by default.

Many JVM users can make huge performance gains by switching the GC to a better once and by toggling all kinds of options.

zaphirplane 361 days ago | | |

That would be the LTS track. A change has no effect on the LTS version which is supported for a long time

pron 361 days ago | |

These things tend to be done gradually out of an abundance of caution. Assuming the experience remains positive, it will be made the default in some future release.

hmottestad 361 days ago |

This particular JEP is just: "Change compact object headers from an experimental feature to a product feature."

Very good performance results though. Particularly like the json parsing benchmark showing a 10% performance improvement.

kosolam 361 days ago |

I wonder if this also improves the efficiency of native image graal built executables?

xxs 361 days ago | |

'this', making the future non-experimental won't do anything. It was already available. With this change it still won't be the default setting.

So, you still need to run some perf. testing on your own to decide.

pron 361 days ago | |

This is a change to the OpenJDK JVM (HotSpot) only. I'm not sure, but I think that Graal Native Image (based on the Substrate VM) may already have small headers.

kosolam 361 days ago | |

I’m asking if this JEP will also improve the performance of native image graal built executables, or only when an app is ran using the jdk?