SVGs that feel like GIFs(koaning.io) |
SVGs that feel like GIFs(koaning.io) |
And sure, you can convert GIF to MP4, but I would question the workflow of anyone using animated GIFs for screen capture in the first place.
And that wasn't my point. SVG supports animation primitives. No need to animate through JS.
https://github.com/marionebl/svg-term-cli/commits/master/
Last commit ~6 years ago. Does not appear to be any viable forks either.
Fortunately, I use nix to manage my system which sort of forces me to inspect the maintenance history of projects. Better than blindly installing `npm` packages in global namespace.
asciinema on the other hand is very interesting. Seems I can do without the svg aspect here, but something to keep in mind (svg animations).
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/SMIL_mis... missile command clone
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/London_U... tube map
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Rolling_... rolling shutter animation
This isn't (AFAICT) animated via JS. (It's animated by a CSS animation, inside the SVG. TFA is wrong about the <animate> tag being what is leveraged.)
You could pack so much into a single binary distributable media file. Games, videos, websites, infographics, tools, chat rooms.
SWF was brilliant and it should have thrived.
SVG support full javascript. It has networking support.
(In web browsers the <img> tag allows only restricted subset, butbyou get the full thing with iframe)
As for the first link, I immediately had to come up with a way to click on the warheads programmatically. I saved the world! :D
It would never even enter my mind that every single subway stop isn’t wheelchair accessible.
Bookmarked!
I was thinking that might be a useful thing for people to spot when a ToS, EULA, etc. changed since those are long documents that frequently get sneaky revisions.
That said, OP's SVG trick may be a smarter choice if the content is a terminal capture.
When I've personally animated SVGs for use in RevealJS presentations, I tend to use CSS animations that I could control with JS if I wanted.
The idea of committing a video to your repository for a PR seems silly. Every PR adds a new video to the codebase? Do you make a PR to prune them every once in a while?
https://jsbin.com/nohamuguze/edit?html,css,output
edit: sigh.... Works in Firefox and Chrome. Has issues in Safari - I'm sure I could futs with it more and get it to work everywhere but still, sadness
I think it's best for embedding a motion demo of a feature your software provides, no more than 5 seconds. Even then, a video option may be useful to some people.
It's quite a challenge for copy-paste to be useful when the terminal is scrolling.
asciinema2svg: https://github.com/thenets/asciinema2svg
termsvg: https://github.com/MrMarble/termsvg
/? terminal svg: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=terminal+svg
/? svg animation: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Here is an evil example SVG for demonstration.
DON'T CLICK THIS LINK UNLESS YOU WANT TO RISK CRASHING YOUR BROWSER!
Although if the affect area does escape the tab, the issue will have higher priority because that would be annoying to user.
Yes, by setting the repeatCount or repeatDur attribute of the <animate> tag to "indefinite". Notably, since <animation> tags effect individual attributes and not the image as a whole, different parts of the image can be on different animation cycles and don't have to add up to some small common multiple.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Reference/E...
<svg viewBox="0 0 10 10" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<rect width="10" height="10">
<animate
attributeName="rx"
values="0;5;0"
dur="10s"
repeatCount="indefinite" />
</rect>
</svg>So not only do you get all the animation support from the attributes, you can fill in anything you need from scripting.
Yes it does.
https://www.w3schools.com/graphics/svg_animation.asp - Has some examples, you may need to refresh to see some of them (ones that don't repeat) in action as you scroll down the page.
* pluggable execution engine/memory model (WASM, JVM, CLR, etc)
* SVG output (binary or text)
From there, the developer can choose whatever model he wants to display a "page", no longer be limited to the Document Object Model.
I think the world is _much_ better off today, with a common language and platform. I don't think those big third party runtimes could survive in the browser in today's threat environment.
How are apps like AutoCAD Web, Photopea, Figma, Google Docs, Google Earth Web, and Flutter for Web apps (CanvasKit) different than what you're asking for? AFAIK developers aren't forced to use the DOM for applications where it's not the best choice.
I’m wondering what other applications this could have
At least every CLI/terminal tool could use it to showcase their application
Example from the Mariner repo[1] after doing a quick google and finding a link to the site.
[1] https://gitlab.com/radek-sprta/mariner/blob/master/README.md
I thought people were just doing GIF color palette optimization with ffmpeg instead.
And even in software which don't support APNG, it'll render as the first frame of the animation, which is probably a fine fallback.
$ asciinema rec test.cast
<do stuff in the terminal then ctrl-d>
$ cat test.cast | svg-term --out=test.svg
edit: formatting
Gmail get it together!
(It observes that this feature raises certain security risks, but promises to figure out by the next draft how to fix them. This of course never happened.)
I recall Hixie had a funny rant about this, but I can't find it.
From curling the malicious page you can also see:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1000" height="1000">And, getting back to the original point, you wouldn’t be worrying that GitHub doesn’t “support” a URL that happens to point to a file of a particular subformat that the URL itself doesn’t disclose.
Also they were basically the founders of persistent fingerprinting via Flash cookies.
So no, thank you, I'm more than happy it didn't thrive more than it already did.
IMO the fact that it belonged to Adobe was the biggest problem, if SWF had been managed by a more capable software org it could have been maintained in a way that kept it from getting banned from the internet. And remember, that's how bad it was - it got banned from the internet because it was absolutely indefensible to leave it around. SWF getting cancelled magically stopped every single family member I have from calling me with weird viruses and corruption they managed to stumble into. I saw more malicious code execution through SWF than I saw from my dumb little cousins torrenting sus ROMs and photoshop crackers. I'd rather not have it than have those problems persist.
In the end, that's just not what happened. I also feel there's no reason an offline web-app shouldn't be able to be packaged/zipped similarly, instead of just a caching mechanism around separate http(s) delivered files.
This is 570k and runs in a webassembly runtime:
https://archive.org/details/flash_badger
SVG could do that too. Minimal javascript plus audio tags.
http://xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net/svg/audio/html5-audio-in-svg.svg
yes stuff like that & the IOSYS MVs. you technically can do stuff like that today theres nothing stopping you from doing it with svgs but i meant more the social part of it. its just interesting that if you want to do the same thing (put an animated video on the inernet) the usual way its now 10x bigger yet looks worse.
also i dont think theres anything like Flash (the authoring software) but for SVGs. i hope there is one but for now I wouldnt say inkscape + a text editor counts
Obviously the fact that it was that low-friction to install any non-sandboxed application code was a very naïve thing to allow, but I still have to hand it to the Macromedia developers for packing the whole player into such a tiny download and making it so frictionless. I'm pretty sure that had a HUGE impact on its adoption over say, Java applets. Java took a lot more time and effort to install, and while it had decent penetration (many "chat room" services and in-browser games like Yahoo Games used Java) it was never taken for granted that 'everyone has it' the way Flash was (until Steve Jobs singlehandedly burned that assumption to the ground with fire).
I bought Flash once. I found a crashing bug and jumped through hoops reporting it. A year or so later, they updated the ticket to suggest I drop $800 for the privilege of seeing whether it had been fixed. I did not make the mistake of giving them money ever again.
They had such an opportunity to take advantage of a platform with a pre-iPhone deployment in the high 90% range, and they just skimped it into oblivion. What a disgrace for everyone who actually cared.
Git commits only differences with the precedent commit, not the entire repository. Therefore the video is only committed once as long as that video doesn’t change.
